Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Pentest Methodology

ASecurity

Ethical security testing methodology - 5-phase pipeline, OWASP checklist, proof levels, structured findings

530 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 5/29/2026
ai-agentsgosqlawstestingcode-reviewapici/cdsecurity

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 5/29/2026

$npx -y skills add vibeeval/vibecosystem --skill pentest-methodology --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pentest Methodology?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pentest Methodology
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vibeeval-pentest-methodology/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vibeeval-pentest-methodology)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: pentest-methodology
description: Ethical security testing methodology - 5-phase pipeline, OWASP checklist, proof levels, structured findings
---

# Pentest Methodology

Etik guvenlik testi metodolojisi. Shannon framework'unden adapte.

**ONEMLI**: Bu skill sadece YETKILI guvenlik testleri icin kullanilir. Bug bounty, pentest anlasmasi, veya kendi sisteminiz olmali.

## 5-Faz Pipeline

```
Phase 1: Recon ──▶ Phase 2: Vuln Analysis ──▶ Phase 3: Exploitation
                                                        │
Phase 5: Report ◀── Phase 4: Verification ◀────────────┘
```

### Phase 1: Reconnaissance (Kesfetme)

| Adim | Arac/Yontem | Cikti |
|------|-------------|-------|
| Subdomain enum | DNS brute, certificate transparency | Subdomain listesi |
| Port scan | nmap, masscan | Acik portlar |
| Tech stack | Wappalyzer, HTTP headers | Teknoloji listesi |
| Directory enum | ffuf, gobuster | Endpoint listesi |
| API discovery | Swagger/OpenAPI, sitemap | API endpoint'leri |
| Source review | JS dosyalari, comments | Hardcoded info |

### Phase 2: Vulnerability Analysis

OWASP Top 10 kontrol matrisi:

| # | Vuln | Test Yontemi |
|---|------|-------------|
| A01 | Broken Access Control | IDOR, privilege escalation, path traversal |
| A02 | Cryptographic Failures | SSL config, weak ciphers, plaintext storage |
| A03 | Injection | SQLi, XSS, command injection, template injection |
| A04 | Insecure Design | Business logic flaws, race conditions |
| A05 | Security Misconfiguration | Default creds, verbose errors, CORS |
| A06 | Vulnerable Components | CVE scan, outdated dependencies |
| A07 | Auth Failures | Brute force, session fixation, JWT attacks |
| A08 | Data Integrity | Deserialization, CI/CD pipeline attacks |
| A09 | Logging Failures | Log injection, insufficient audit trail |
| A10 | SSRF | Internal service access, cloud metadata |

### Phase 3: Exploitation (Dogrulama)

Her bulgu icin:
1. **Reproduce**: Tekrarlanabilir adimlar yaz
2. **Proof**: Etkiyi goster (ekran goruntusu, response)
3. **Impact**: Gercek etki ne? (Data leak, RCE, account takeover)
4. **Scope**: Etki alani ne kadar genis?

### Phase 4: Verification

Bulgunun gercek oldugunu dogrula:
- False positive degil mi? Farkli kosullarda tekrarla
- Scope dogru mu? Sadece bir endpoint mi, yoksa sistemik mi?
- Severity dogru mu? Etkiyi abartma, kucumseme

### Phase 5: Report

Yapilandirilmis bulgu formati (asagida)

## Proof Levels

| Level | Tanim | Ornek |
|-------|-------|-------|
| L1 - Theoretical | Potansiyel risk, exploit edilmemis | "Bu endpoint input validate etmiyor" |
| L2 - Demonstrated | Bypass/leak gosterildi | "SQL injection ile hata mesaji leak etti" |
| L3 - Exploited | Tam exploit, veri erisimi | "Admin panel'e yetkisiz erisim saglandi" |
| L4 - Chained | Birden fazla vuln zincirlendi | "XSS + CSRF = Account takeover" |

## Structured Finding Format

```markdown
## [SEVERITY] Finding Title

**ID**: FINDING-001
**Severity**: Critical / High / Medium / Low / Informational
**Proof Level**: L1 / L2 / L3 / L4
**CVSS**: X.X (hesapla: cvss.org)
**CWE**: CWE-XXX

### Description
Ne bulundu, tek paragraf.

### Impact
Exploit edilirse ne olur?

### Steps to Reproduce
1. [Adim 1]
2. [Adim 2]
3. [Adim 3]

### Proof
[Screenshot, HTTP request/response, veya kod]

### Remediation
Nasil duzeltilir?

### References
- [OWASP link]
- [CWE link]
```

## Source-to-Sink Taint Tracing

Kullanici input'unun tehlikeli bir fonksiyona ulasip ulasamadigini kontrol et:

```
Source (Input)        ──▶  Transform/Sanitize?  ──▶  Sink (Tehlikeli fonksiyon)
req.body.username     ──▶  Validation var mi?    ──▶  db.query(...)
req.query.redirect    ──▶  URL whitelist var mi?  ──▶  res.redirect(...)
req.headers.host      ──▶  Sanitize var mi?      ──▶  fetch(...)
```

**Source'lar**: req.body, req.query, req.params, req.headers, cookies, file uploads
**Sink'ler**: SQL query, eval(), exec(), redirect(), innerHTML, dangerouslySetInnerHTML

## Agent Entegrasyonu

- **security-analyst**: Bu pipeline'i kullanarak tam guvenlik auditi yapar
- **security-reviewer**: Code review sirasinda vuln pattern'lerini kontrol eder
- **code-reviewer**: Security-relevant code degisikliklerinde flag kaldirir

## Kurallar

- Yetki olmadan test YAPMA
- Rate limiting'e uy, sistemi cokertme
- Buldugun seyi raporla, exploit etme (beyond PoC)
- Hassas verileri rapordan cikar (maskeleme)
- Remediation onerisi ZORUNLU

Attribution

vibeevalvibeeval
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from vibeeval →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →