Skip to content
Back to skills

Ppi Workflows

ASecurity

"Operate the DeepGCNs PPI node-classification workflow with exact

  • 247 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 8, 2026
testingnodetestinggitapibackend

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 8, 2026

npx -y skills add VectorSpaceLab/AREX-Skill --skill ppi-workflows --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ppi Workflows?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ppi Workflows
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vectorspacelab-ppi-workflows/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vectorspacelab-ppi-workflows)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ppi-workflows
description: "Operate the DeepGCNs PPI node-classification workflow with exact
  train/test flags, residual/plain/dense architecture choices, PyG loader and
  DataParallel boundaries, micro/macro F1 semantics, and checkpoint alignment
  without downloading data or running full training."
disable-model-invocation: true
metadata:
  disco-role: operating
license: MIT
---

# PPI workflows

Use this skill for the source-evidenced protein-protein interaction (PPI) node
classification workflow, including its residual/plain/dense backbones and
F1-based evaluation. This is a reference-only operating skill. The original
source example is evidence only, not a runtime dependency: use only a
caller-supplied PPI entry point and staged local inputs. Do not copy or launch
the full training program, download PPI data, fetch external-drive checkpoints,
or claim that a CPU smoke reproduces the published GPU result.

## Route first

- **PPI node classification**: read [workflows.md](references/workflows.md),
  then validate the data and metric contract in
  [data-and-metrics.md](references/data-and-metrics.md).
- **Generic GraphConv, EdgeConv, MRConv, GAT/GIN/GCN/SAGE construction, KNN,
  GENConv, or block API questions**: route to the sibling
  [graph-layers](../graph-layers/SKILL.md) skill. Keep this skill's architecture
  choices at the task level.
- **OGB proteins or another OGB benchmark**: route to
  [ogb-workflows](../ogb-workflows/SKILL.md). OGB proteins is not the PyG PPI
  dataset and does not share its split, feature, label, or checkpoint
  conventions.
- **ModelNet40, S3DIS, PartNet, or point-cloud layouts**: route to the sibling
  point-cloud workflow skill.

## Safe operating sequence

1. Establish the requested phase (`train` or `test`), prepared local data root,
   feature and label dimensions, device/backend, loader mode, architecture
   tuple (`block`, `conv`, `n_filters`, `n_blocks`, and `n_heads`), and checkpoint
   path if any.
2. Verify that the data and checkpoint were staged by the caller. The upstream
   PyG dataset can auto-download when files are absent, but this skill never
   permits that side effect. Do not run a download or embed a downloader.
3. Check the exact flags and source-observed defaults in
   [workflows.md](references/workflows.md). In particular, do not rely on the
   README's prose default for filter width: the parser's default is authoritative
   for the source workflow.
4. Align the checkpoint basename and tensor shapes with the requested model
   before loading. A checkpoint is not interchangeable merely because it is
   labelled `ppi`.
5. Prefer a tiny, local, synthetic forward/parser check when validating an
   environment. Treat full PPI training, validation, and benchmark numbers as
   GPU/data/checkpoint-dependent prerequisites, not as bundled actions.
6. Report micro F1 separately from macro F1. The source path computes micro F1
   only; it does not produce macro F1.

## Operating invariants

- PPI examples use static sparse graph convolutions over PyG `edge_index`.
  Node features have shape `[num_nodes, num_features]`; output logits have
  shape `[num_nodes, num_classes]`. The model obtains `data.batch`, but the
  static PPI forward path does not use it to construct a graph.
- The standard PyG PPI contract is 50 floating-point node features and 121
  binary gene-ontology labels. `n_classes` is inferred from the test dataset;
  it is not a CLI flag.
- The loss is `BCEWithLogitsLoss`. A positive prediction is formed by testing
  the raw logit with `out > 0`, equivalent to a sigmoid threshold of 0.5.
- The documented score is micro F1 (`average="micro"`) over multilabel node
  predictions. Macro F1 (`average="macro"`) is a different statistic and must
  not be inferred from the source's `mF1`/`m-F1` log label.
- Checkpoint architecture identity is
  `ppi-{block}-{conv}-{n_blocks}-{n_filters}`, optionally followed by
  `-{postname}`. The phase suffix is `_val_best` or `_test_best`; see the
  checkpoint section in the references for the save-directory date component.
- `--multi_gpus` selects PyG `DataListLoader` for training and wraps the model
  with PyG `DataParallel`. The source constructs ordinary `DataLoader` objects
  for validation/test, so multi-GPU evaluation is a compatibility boundary and
  must be checked rather than assumed.

## Scope boundary

The references preserve exact source-observed commands, flags, data fields,
metric behavior, checkpoint naming, and failure modes without bundling the
training implementation. No PPI configuration checker is included: the
parser has source-era boolean and path behavior, while a safe checker that
faithfully validates data/checkpoint contents would either duplicate the
training stack or invite data access. This explicit reference-only choice keeps
the runtime tree offline-safe and makes the unsupported parts visible.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • references/data-and-metrics.md5.7 KB
  • references/troubleshooting.md8.4 KB
  • references/workflows.md10.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.