Skip to content
Back to skills

Design Explore

ASecurity

Explore 2-4 design options with pros/cons/criteria matrix before writing code. Use for L3-L4 tasks (refactors, architecture, new subsystems). Pairs with save_decision MCP tool.

  • 72 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
ai-agentsperformance

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add vbcherepanov/total-agent-memory --skill design-explore --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Design Explore?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Design Explore
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/vbcherepanov-design-explore/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vbcherepanov-design-explore)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: design-explore
description: Explore 2-4 design options with pros/cons/criteria matrix before writing code. Use for L3-L4 tasks (refactors, architecture, new subsystems). Pairs with save_decision MCP tool.
---

# design-explore

Use this skill when the user asks for "design", "architecture", "approach", "options", "trade-offs", "how should we do X", or when task classifier returns level >= 3.

## Workflow

1. **Discover prior art** — `memory_recall(query="<task keywords>", mode="index", limit=10)` + `analogize(query="<task description>", exclude_project=None)` — check if similar decision was made before.

2. **Generate 2-4 options** for the design space. For each option, fill:
   - **Core approach** (1 sentence)
   - **Implementation sketch** (3-5 lines)
   - **Pros** (3 bullets)
   - **Cons** (2-3 bullets)
   - **Unknowns** (what we don't yet know)

3. **Build criteria matrix** — list 3-5 criteria that matter (e.g. performance, maintainability, migration risk, team familiarity). Rate each option 1-5 per criterion.

4. **Pick one** with justification referring to matrix. Name what was **discarded** and why.

5. **Save** — `save_decision(title, options, criteria_matrix, selected, rationale, discarded, project)`.

6. **Only then** proceed to implementation — with a clear decision in memory for next session.

## Output template

```markdown
## Decision: {title}

### Prior art
{memory_recall/analogize results — 1-2 sentences}

### Options

#### 1. {option name}
- **Approach:** {1 sentence}
- **Implementation:** {sketch}
- **Pros:** {3 bullets}
- **Cons:** {3 bullets}
- **Unknowns:** {bullets}

#### 2. {option name}
... (same structure)

### Criteria matrix

| Criterion | Option 1 | Option 2 | ... |
|---|:-:|:-:|:-:|
| {criterion} | 5 | 3 | ... |

### Selected: {option name}

{rationale — 2-3 sentences referencing matrix}

### Discarded

- **{option name}**: {1-sentence reason}
```

## When NOT to use

- L1/L2 tasks (quick fixes, straightforward additions) — overkill, just do it.
- Single-option situations (no real trade-off).
- Implementation bugs (debug first, design later).

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.