Create/edit .docx files with styles, templates, comments, and extraction workflows. Use when asked to generate Word reports, contracts, proposals, or convert Word content.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public --skill document-docx --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Document Docx?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vasilyu1983-document-docx)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: document-docx
description: "Create/edit .docx files with styles, templates, comments, and extraction workflows. Use when asked to generate Word reports, contracts, proposals, or convert Word content."
allowed-tools: Bash, Read, Write, Glob, Grep
compatibility: Claude Code + Codex. Uses runtime-specific allowed-tools / argument-hint fields.
version: "1.1"
last_validated: 2026-07-11
---
# Document DOCX Skill - Quick Reference
This skill covers creation, editing, review, extraction, and release workflows for `.docx` documents.
Modern best practices (Jul 2026):
- Treat `.docx` as the editable source and PDF as a release artifact.
- Prefer templates and built-in styles over manual formatting.
- Use comments for review notes; use Word Compare for true redlines.
- For LLM/RAG extraction, optimize for structure, trust level, and sanitization rather than visual fidelity.
- Treat macro-enabled Office files (`.docm`, `.dotm`) as untrusted by default.
- Before promising a feature (comments, alt text, tracked changes), check the installed library version — several of these APIs are recent additions and silently absent on older pins. See "Version-Gate Before Promising A Feature" below.
## Core Decision Rules (2026)
- If non-developers need to own layout/design, prefer `docxtpl` with a Word-authored template.
- If the stack is Python and edits are structural, prefer `python-docx`.
- If the stack is TypeScript/Node and the output is generated server-side, prefer `docx`.
- If you need semantic HTML from a trusted document, prefer `mammoth`, then sanitize before rendering or storing the output.
- If you need Markdown/JSON for search, indexing, or RAG, prefer `MarkItDown` or `Docling`.
- If the user asks for tracked changes, do not promise high-level library support. Generate a revised `.docx` and use Word Compare, or switch to OOXML-specialized tooling.
- If the user asks for PDF output, prefer Word automation for highest fidelity and LibreOffice headless for cross-platform batch workflows.
- If the input is `.doc`, convert to `.docx` first. If it is `.docm` or `.dotm`, do not trust embedded macros.
## Quick Reference
| Task | Tool/Library | Language | When to Use |
|------|--------------|----------|-------------|
| Create/edit DOCX | `python-docx` | Python | Structural edits, reports, contracts, section/table/image work |
| Create/edit DOCX | `docx` | Node.js | Server-side generation in TypeScript-heavy stacks |
| Template fill | `docxtpl` | Python | Word-authored templates, mail merge, batch documents |
| Add/access comments | `python-docx` + Word review workflow | Python / Word | Review notes without tracked revisions |
| Convert DOCX to HTML | `mammoth` | Node.js | Semantic HTML from trusted documents |
| Convert DOCX to Markdown | `MarkItDown` | Python | LLM/RAG ingestion where Markdown is preferred |
| Convert DOCX to Markdown/HTML/JSON | `Docling` | Python / CLI | Multi-format ingestion, structured extraction, batch conversion |
| Parse text/tables/metadata | `python-docx` + OOXML inspection | Python | Extraction, audits, migration tooling |
| Parse tracked changes/comments | OOXML, Open XML SDK, docx4j, Aspose.Words | Python / .NET / Java | Revision-heavy workflows and interoperability edge cases |
| Convert DOCX to PDF | Word automation / LibreOffice headless | OS tooling | Release artifacts and cross-platform smoke checks |
## Selection Guide
- Prefer `docxtpl` when a legal, ops, or business user needs to maintain the template in Word.
- Prefer `python-docx` for moderate formatting complexity where you control the document structure in code.
- Prefer `docx` when the surrounding service and tests already live in Node.js.
- Prefer `mammoth` for trusted, text-first conversion to HTML; it is not a fidelity-preserving renderer.
- Prefer `MarkItDown` for simple DOCX-to-Markdown pipelines.
- Prefer `Docling` when DOCX is only one input among many formats or you need HTML/JSON/Markdown/text output from a unified pipeline.
## ASCII Flow
```text
DOCX request
|
v
Classify file + trust level
|-- .docx / .dotx -----> normal OOXML workflow
|-- .doc -------------> convert to .docx first
|-- .docm / .dotm ----> treat macros as untrusted
|
v
Choose lane
|-- Word-owned template ------> docxtpl
|-- Python structural edit ---> python-docx
|-- Node service generation --> docx
|-- trusted HTML conversion --> mammoth + sanitizer
|-- Markdown / JSON ingest ---> MarkItDown or Docling
|-- tracked-change review ----> revised DOCX + Word Compare
|
v
Generate, edit, or extract
|
v
Quality gate
|-- parseability + unresolved tags ---> scripts/docx_quality_gate.py
|-- comments / revisions / OOXML ----> scripts/docx_inspect_ooxml.py
|
v
Viewer, accessibility, and release checks
```
## Format And Safety Caveats
- `.docx` and `.dotx` are Office Open XML packages; `.doc` is legacy binary and needs conversion first.
- `.docm` and `.dotm` are macro-enabled; do not treat them as safe content inputs.
- `python-docx` can add and read comments in the main document body, but not threaded replies/resolved states, and not comment anchors in headers/footers.
- `python-docx` does not provide reliable tracked-change authoring.
- `mammoth` performs no sanitization of generated HTML or links from untrusted source documents.
- Tables of contents and many Word fields are placeholders until updated in Word.
## Version-Gate Before Promising A Feature
Do not assume the environment has a current library. This is the single most common way this skill causes a confident-but-wrong answer:
- `Document.add_comment()` only exists from `python-docx` 1.2.0 onward. On an older pinned version it raises `AttributeError`, not a graceful fallback. Check first: `python -c "import docx; print(docx.__version__)"`.
- python-docx still has no public high-level property for image alt text (no `.alt_text` on `InlineShape`) as of the current 1.x line — `InlineShape` only documents `height`, `width`, and `type`. The OOXML workaround in `references/accessibility-compliance.md` reaches into the private `_inline` attribute; treat that as an implementation detail that can move between releases, re-verify after any python-docx upgrade, and prefer `python-docx`'s own comment/style APIs wherever a public one exists instead of private attributes.
- If a user asks for a feature this skill flags as unsupported (tracked-change authoring, threaded comment replies, resolved-state comments), say so plainly rather than approximating it with formatting hacks — a document that merely *looks* right (e.g., colored/struck-through text standing in for `<w:ins>`/`<w:del>`) will fail any real redline/legal review because it carries no revision metadata.
## Default Workflow
1. Identify the file type and trust level: `.docx`/`.dotx` vs `.docm`/`.dotm` vs legacy `.doc`.
2. Pick the lane:
- Template generation -> `docxtpl`
- Programmatic structure edits -> `python-docx` or `docx`
- Review/comments -> comments or Word Compare
- LLM extraction -> `MarkItDown`, `Docling`, or `mammoth`
3. Generate or modify the document.
4. Run `scripts/docx_quality_gate.py` and, when needed, `scripts/docx_inspect_ooxml.py`.
5. If shipping externally, validate rendering in Word plus at least one secondary viewer and apply accessibility hygiene.
## Core Operations
### Create A Document (Python - `python-docx`)
```python
from docx import Document
from docx.enum.text import WD_ALIGN_PARAGRAPH
from docx.shared import Inches
doc = Document()
title = doc.add_heading("Quarterly Review", 0)
title.alignment = WD_ALIGN_PARAGRAPH.CENTER
doc.add_paragraph("Executive summary goes here.")
table = doc.add_table(rows=2, cols=2)
table.style = "Table Grid"
table.rows[0].cells[0].text = "Metric"
table.rows[0].cells[1].text = "Value"
table.rows[1].cells[0].text = "Revenue"
table.rows[1].cells[1].text = "$1.2M"
doc.add_picture("chart.png", width=Inches(4.5))
doc.save("quarterly-review.docx")
```
### Add A Review Comment (Python - `python-docx`)
```python
from docx import Document
doc = Document()
paragraph = doc.add_paragraph("This clause needs legal review.")
comment = doc.add_comment(
runs=paragraph.runs,
text="Clarify whether this applies to renewals as well.",
author="Legal",
initials="LG",
)
comment.paragraphs[0].add_run(" Add the renewal edge case explicitly.").bold = True
doc.save("reviewable.docx")
```
### Fill A Template (Python - `docxtpl`)
```python
from docxtpl import DocxTemplate
doc = DocxTemplate("template.docx")
context = {
"company_name": "Acme Corp",
"contract_date": "2026-03-13",
"items": [
{"name": "Widget A", "price": 100},
{"name": "Widget B", "price": 200},
],
}
doc.render(context)
doc.save("filled-template.docx")
```
### Convert Trusted DOCX To HTML (Script)
```bash
node scripts/docx_to_html.mjs input.docx output.html --style-map custom-style-map.txt --extract-images-dir output-assets/
```
### Extract Structure For Automation (Script)
```bash
python3 scripts/docx_extract.py input.docx --include headers footers hyperlinks comments images --out extracted.json
```
## Output Quality Checklist
- Structure: heading hierarchy, list styles, and tables are intentional and consistent.
- Reviewability: comments or Word Compare are used for feedback-heavy workflows instead of ad hoc formatting hacks.
- Safety: macro-enabled files are treated as untrusted; HTML generated from DOCX is sanitized before use.
- Portability: fonts, numbering, tables, and images are checked in at least one non-Word viewer when documents are distributed.
- Accessibility hygiene: headings, descriptive links, table headers, document language, and alt text are present where needed.
- Release quality: run `scripts/docx_quality_gate.py` before shipping or batch-publishing.
## Optional: AI / Automation
Use only when explicitly requested and policy-compliant.
- Convert trusted DOCX content into Markdown/HTML/JSON for search or RAG.
- Summarize meeting notes into a Word template, but keep humans accountable for factual accuracy.
- Generate first-pass reports/contracts from structured data, then route through human review.
## Navigation
**Resources**
- [references/docx-patterns.md](references/docx-patterns.md) - Styles, headers/footers, tables, sections, TOC
- [references/template-workflows.md](references/template-workflows.md) - Template authoring, mail merge, batch rendering
- [references/review-comments-workflows.md](references/review-comments-workflows.md) - Comments, review notes, Word Compare, comment limits
- [references/tracked-changes.md](references/tracked-changes.md) - What is and is not feasible for tracked revisions
- [references/llm-extraction-workflows.md](references/llm-extraction-workflows.md) - Mammoth, MarkItDown, Docling, HTML/Markdown/JSON extraction
- [references/accessibility-compliance.md](references/accessibility-compliance.md) - Word accessibility, EN 301 549 context, manual checks
- [references/cross-platform-compatibility.md](references/cross-platform-compatibility.md) - Word, Google Docs, LibreOffice, PDF conversion
- [references/document-automation-pipelines.md](references/document-automation-pipelines.md) - CI/CD, batch generation, quality gates
- [data/sources.json](data/sources.json) - Current external documentation links
**Scripts**
- `scripts/docx_inspect_ooxml.py` - Dependency-free OOXML inspection for tracked changes and comments
- `scripts/docx_extract.py` - Extract text, tables, metadata, and optional headers/footers/hyperlinks/comments/images to JSON
- `scripts/docx_render_template.py` - Render a `docxtpl` template from JSON
- `scripts/docx_to_html.mjs` - Convert trusted `.docx` to HTML with style maps and optional image extraction
- `scripts/docx_quality_gate.py` - Validate parseability, unresolved template tags, tracked-change/comment signals, and optional LibreOffice conversion
**Templates**
- [assets/report-template.md](assets/report-template.md) - Standard report structure
- [assets/contract-template.md](assets/contract-template.md) - Legal document structure
- [assets/doc-template-pack.md](assets/doc-template-pack.md) - Decision log, meeting notes, changelog templates
- [assets/docx-template-authoring-checklist.md](assets/docx-template-authoring-checklist.md) - Template authoring and handoff checklist
**Related Skills**
- [../document-pdf/SKILL.md](../document-pdf/SKILL.md) - PDF generation and release workflows
- [../document-xlsx/SKILL.md](../document-xlsx/SKILL.md) - Spreadsheet generation and exports
- [../document-pptx/SKILL.md](../document-pptx/SKILL.md) - Presentation generation
- [../docs-codebase/SKILL.md](../docs-codebase/SKILL.md) - Technical writing patterns
## Fact-Checking
- Use `data/sources.json` as the starting set of primary sources.
- Use web search/web fetch to verify current external facts, versions, release behavior, regulations, and platform quirks before final answers.
- Prefer primary documentation, package pages, release pages, and official standards pages.
- If web access is unavailable, state the limitation and mark volatile guidance as unverified.
## Learnings Loop
Before applying this skill on a non-trivial task, read `learnings.consolidated.md` in this directory (and `learnings.md` if present).
After applying it, if you encountered a pattern worth remembering, a mistake worth preventing, or a domain fact that surprised you, append one dated bullet to `learnings.md` via `agents-skills-feedback-loop/scripts/append_learning.py`. Do not modify `SKILL.md` itself.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!