Prevent adversarial review dispatch failures caused by relative prompt paths, superseded background sessions, and stale completion notices when launching Codex/Gemini review jobs.
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Absolute Path Review Prompt Dispatch?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vamseeachanta-absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch
description: Prevent adversarial review dispatch failures caused by relative prompt paths, superseded background sessions, and stale completion notices when launching Codex/Gemini review jobs.
version: 1.0.0
author: Hermes Agent
category: software-development
tags: [review, codex, gemini, background-processes, prompt-packaging, governance]
---
# Absolute-Path Review Prompt Dispatch
Use when launching adversarial plan/code reviews through background `codex exec` or `gemini exec` jobs.
## When this skill applies
- You write a review prompt to `.planning/quick/*.md`
- You launch Codex/Gemini in background mode with `terminal(background=true, pty=true)`
- You need review artifacts to remain trustworthy even if an earlier dispatch attempt fails
## Core problem
A review prompt file can exist in the repo, but a background shell may still fail to resolve a relative path like:
`codex exec "$(cat .planning/quick/review-342-prompt.md)"`
Observed failure:
- `cat: .planning/quick/review-342-prompt.md: No such file or directory`
This can happen even when the file exists under the intended workdir. Once you recover and relaunch successfully, Hermes may still deliver stale completion notices for the earlier failed session.
## Reliable pattern
### 1. Write the prompt into the real workspace
Use `terminal()` or another real-filesystem write path so the shell can read it.
### 2. Verify existence before dispatch
Run a real-shell check such as:
- `pwd`
- `find . -maxdepth 3 -type f | grep 'review-342'`
- `ls -la .planning .planning/quick`
### 3. Launch with absolute paths
Prefer absolute prompt and output paths:
```bash
codex exec "$(cat /abs/path/to/review-342-prompt.md)" \
2>&1 | tee /abs/path/to/review-342-codex.out
gemini exec "$(cat /abs/path/to/review-342-prompt.md)" \
2>&1 | tee /abs/path/to/review-342-gemini.out
```
This avoids cwd drift and ambiguous shell context in background runs.
### 4. Treat the first successful recovered run as canonical
If the original run fails and you relaunch:
- kill the failed process if still running
- save artifacts only from the recovered canonical run
- ignore later stale completion notices from superseded sessions
### 5. Record unavailable providers explicitly
If Gemini/Codex never yields a substantive review, save a canonical artifact with:
- verdict: `UNAVAILABLE`
- concrete failure reason
- raw log path
- operational decision taken
## Minimal recovery workflow
1. Background run fails with relative-path `cat` error
2. Confirm prompt file actually exists on disk
3. Kill the failed background session
4. Relaunch with absolute prompt path + absolute tee path
5. Wait/poll the new session only
6. Save the canonical review artifact(s)
7. Ignore stale system completion messages for the abandoned session
## Pitfalls
- Relative prompt paths can fail in background shells even when the repo workdir looks correct
- A stale completion notification can arrive after you already saved the real review result
- Raw background logs are not the durable artifact; always write the final canonical review file under `scripts/review/results/`
## Good signs
- `find`/`ls` show the prompt file before launch
- background command uses absolute paths for both `cat` and `tee`
- later system notifications do not change the already-saved canonical outcome
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!