Trace where the user's recorded position on something has shifted: superseded claims, contradictions between sources of different dates, and what evidence moved them. Use this skill when the user asks what they have changed their mind about, how their thinking on a topic developed, what they used to believe, or wants a quarterly look back at their own positions. Do NOT use for finding contradictions between sources with no time dimension, or for a current-state answer.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Second Brain Changed My Mind?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/undefined-ui-second-brain-changed-my-mind)
---
name: second-brain-changed-my-mind
description: >-
Trace where the user's recorded position on something has shifted: superseded
claims, contradictions between sources of different dates, and what evidence
moved them. Use this skill when the user asks what they have changed their mind
about, how their thinking on a topic developed, what they used to believe, or
wants a quarterly look back at their own positions. Do NOT use for finding
contradictions between sources with no time dimension, or for a current-state
answer.
---
# Trace changed positions
This is the query a vault can answer that nothing else can, and the reason the
supersession rules exist. It only works because contradictions are recorded
rather than overwritten.
## Core rule
Report the change with both positions, both dates and the evidence between them.
A conclusion without its history is just the current claim.
## Workflow
1. **Find superseded claims** across concept pages, and contradictions where the
sources differ in date.
2. **Reconstruct the sequence:** what the page said, when, based on what; what
changed it, when.
3. **Distinguish real revision from correction.** A factual error being fixed is
not a change of mind. A conclusion being revised on better evidence is.
4. **Flag unresolved ones.** Contradictions still sitting open are the most
actionable output here.
5. **Say how firm the current position is,** based on what moved it.
## Output format
```
## <topic>
Was: <claim> (<source>, <date>)
Now: <claim> (<source>, <date>)
What moved it: <evidence>
Firmness: <what would move it again>
## Still unresolved
<contradictions with no current position>
```
## Calibration
If nothing has changed in the period, say so in one line. Manufacturing an
apparent revision from two pages that never disagreed is worse than an empty
result.
Never present the more recent source as correct by virtue of being recent.