Guide for hyperparameter selection — learning rate formulas, LoRA rank, batch size, group size, schedules, and model-specific tuning. Use when the user asks about learning rate, batch size, hyperparameter tuning, or how to configure training parameters.
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add uiuc-kang-lab/rlvr_generalization_bounds --skill hyperparams --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Hyperparams?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/uiuc-kang-lab-hyperparams)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: hyperparams
description: Guide for hyperparameter selection — learning rate formulas, LoRA rank, batch size, group size, schedules, and model-specific tuning. Use when the user asks about learning rate, batch size, hyperparameter tuning, or how to configure training parameters.
---
# Hyperparameter Selection
Guide for choosing training hyperparameters across SL, RL, DPO, and distillation.
## Reference
- `docs/supervised-learning/sl-hyperparams.mdx` — SL hyperparameter guide with LR formula
- `docs/rl/rl-hyperparams.mdx` — RL hyperparameters (batch_size, group_size, num_substeps, async)
- `tinker_cookbook/hyperparam_utils.py` — LR formulas and model-specific calculations
## Learning rate
### The formula
The recommended LR for a model `m` with LoRA:
```
LR(m) = lr_base × M_LoRA × (2000 / H_m) ^ P_m
```
Where:
- `lr_base = 5e-5`
- `M_LoRA = 10` (1 for full fine-tuning)
- `H_m` = hidden size of the model
- `P_m` = model-specific exponent (0.0775 for Qwen, 0.781 for Llama)
### Use the helper function
```python
from tinker_cookbook.hyperparam_utils import get_lr
lr = get_lr("meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B", is_lora=True)
# Returns model-specific recommended LR
```
This formula gives <0.5% regret vs exhaustive sweeps across diverse SFT experiments.
### Rules of thumb
| Training type | Typical LR range | Notes |
|---------------|------------------|-------|
| SL (LoRA) | 1e-4 to 5e-4 | Use `get_lr()` |
| SL (full FT) | 1e-5 to 5e-5 | LoRA LR / 10 |
| RL | 1e-5 to 4e-5 | Lower than SL |
| DPO | ~1e-5 | Much lower than SL |
| RLHF (RL stage) | ~1e-5 | Same as RL |
| Distillation | ~1e-4 | Similar to SL |
## LoRA rank
- **Default**: 32 for most tasks
- **Higher rank** (64–128): More capacity, needed for complex tasks or large models
- **Lower rank** (8–16): Faster, sufficient for simple adaptations
- LR is **independent** of LoRA rank (validated empirically)
```python
from tinker_cookbook.hyperparam_utils import get_lora_param_count
# Check parameter count for a given rank
params = get_lora_param_count("meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B", lora_rank=32)
```
## Batch size
### SL batch size
- Measured in **tokens**, not examples
- **Recommended**: Start with 128
- Smaller batch sizes often give better final performance at cost of longer training
- Scale LR proportionally: `LR ∝ √batch_size`
- Aim for at least 100 training steps (best results with 1000+)
### RL batch size and group size
Two parameters control RL batch composition:
- **`batch_size`** (or `groups_per_batch`): Number of unique problems/environments per batch
- **`group_size`**: Number of rollouts per problem (advantages centered within group)
```
total_rollouts = batch_size × group_size
```
Guidelines:
- If limited problems: increase `group_size` for more training signal
- Scale LR with batch_size: `LR ∝ √batch_size`
- Start small for debugging (`groups_per_batch=4, group_size=2`)
## Learning rate schedule
Available schedules:
- `"linear"` — Linear decay to 0 (most common)
- `"cosine"` — Cosine annealing
- `"constant"` — No decay
Set via `lr_schedule` parameter in config.
## `num_substeps` (RL)
Controls how many optimizer updates per sampling iteration:
- `num_substeps=1` (default): One update per batch — simplest, usually sufficient
- `num_substeps>1`: Splits batch into mini-batches, one update each. Requires PPO objective.
- Start with 2–4 if experimenting; decrease LR with higher values
## DPO-specific
- **`dpo_beta=0.1`** — Well-tested default. Controls deviation from reference model.
- Lower beta = more aggressive optimization
- Higher beta = stays closer to reference
## Distillation-specific
- **`kl_penalty_coef=1.0`** — Weight of KL penalty from teacher
- **`kl_discount_factor=0.0`** — No discounting (increase for long sequences)
## Quick-start recommendations
| Scenario | Model | LR | Batch | LoRA Rank |
|----------|-------|-----|-------|-----------|
| SFT on chat data | Llama-3.1-8B | `get_lr(model)` | 128 | 32 |
| Math GRPO | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 4e-5 | 128×16 | 32 |
| DPO | Llama-3.2-1B | 1e-5 | 256 | 32 |
| Distillation | Qwen3-8B-Base | 1e-4 | 1024×4 | 128 |
| Multi-turn RL | Kimi-K2-Thinking | 1e-5 | 8×4 | 32 |
## Common pitfalls
- LoRA needs ~10x higher LR than full fine-tuning — use `get_lr()` to get it right
- `get_lr()` currently only supports Llama and Qwen families — other models need manual tuning
- DPO LR should be much lower than SFT (1e-5 vs 2e-4)
- RL LR should be lower than SFT — too aggressive updates destabilize the policy
- Batch size too small = noisy gradients; too large = diminishing returns
- Monitor KL divergence in RL — training is stable when KL < 0.01
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!