Team composition knowledge for Claude Code Agent Teams - when to suggest teams, optimal sizing, spawn prompt patterns
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install travisjneuman/.claude---
name: agent-teams
description: Team composition knowledge for Claude Code Agent Teams - when to suggest teams, optimal sizing, spawn prompt patterns
allowed-tools: []
---
# Agent Teams Composition Skill
You have expertise in composing and orchestrating Claude Code Agent Teams. Use this knowledge when the user's task would benefit from parallel multi-session work.
## When to Suggest Agent Teams
Proactively suggest agent teams when:
- The user asks for comprehensive code review (suggest 3-reviewer team)
- The task involves work across multiple layers (frontend + backend + database)
- The user describes a bug with unclear root cause (suggest competing hypothesis investigation)
- The user wants to evaluate multiple technologies or approaches (suggest research panel)
- The task can be clearly split into independent, file-separated workstreams
Do NOT suggest agent teams when:
- The task is sequential or involves same-file edits
- A single session or subagent would suffice
- The coordination overhead would exceed the benefit
- The user is on a tight token budget
## Team Templates
### Full Review (3 teammates)
Security reviewer + Performance reviewer + Test coverage reviewer.
Each reviews independently, then lead synthesizes findings.
### Feature Dev (3 teammates)
Architect (plan approval required) + Implementer + Test writer.
Architect plans first, implementer follows, test writer validates.
### Debug Squad (3-5 teammates)
Each teammate investigates a different hypothesis.
Adversarial debate structure -- teammates challenge each other's theories.
### Cross-Platform (3 teammates)
iOS developer + Android developer + Shared architect.
Each platform teammate owns their own directory. Architect coordinates API contracts.
### Full-Stack (3 teammates)
Frontend + Backend + Database.
Clear file ownership per layer. Coordinate on API contracts first.
### Research Panel (3 teammates)
Simplicity advocate + Performance advocate + Devil's advocate.
Each evaluates from a different perspective, then synthesize.
## Spawn Prompt Formula
Every spawn prompt should include:
1. Role: "You are the [role] teammate responsible for [domain]"
2. Files: "You own files in [directories]. Do not modify files outside your scope."
3. Focus: "Specifically look for / implement [details]"
4. Context: "[Project-specific information the teammate needs]"
5. Deliverable: "Report your findings as [format] / Implement [specific output]"
## Cross-Platform Awareness
- macOS and Linux: full support (in-process + tmux split panes)
- Windows: in-process mode only (automatic with auto setting)
- Always use `--teammate-mode auto` (default) for automatic detection
## Related Documentation
- `~/.claude/docs/AGENT-TEAMS.md` - Full guide with examples
- `~/.claude/docs/reference/workflows/agent-teams.md` - Decision framework
- `~/.claude/commands/assemble-team.md` - Quick team assembly command
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!