Skip to content
Back to skills

Prototype

ASecurity

Executes a rapid prototyping workflow that skips normal standards to quickly validate a product concept or core mechanic, producing throwaway code and a prototype report. Use when the user wants to quickly test an idea or mentions prototyping, proof of concept, or MVP spike.

  • 71 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aibashtestingapiperformance

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add tranhieutt/software_development_department --skill prototype --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Prototype?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Prototype
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tranhieutt-prototype/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tranhieutt-prototype)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: prototype
type: workflow
description: "Executes a rapid prototyping workflow that skips normal standards to quickly validate a product concept or core mechanic, producing throwaway code and a prototype report. Use when the user wants to quickly test an idea or mentions prototyping, proof of concept, or MVP spike."
argument-hint: "[concept-description]"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash
effort: 3
when_to_use: "Use when the user wants to quickly validate a product concept or core mechanic before committing to full implementation, or mentions prototyping, proof of concept, or MVP spike."
---

When this skill is invoked:

1. **Read the concept description** from the argument. Identify the core
   question this prototype must answer. If the concept is vague, state the
   question explicitly before proceeding.

2. **Read CLAUDE.md** for project context and the current tech stack. Understand
   what engine, language, and frameworks are in use so the prototype is built
   with compatible tooling.

3. **Create a prototype plan**: Define in 3-5 bullet points what the minimum
   viable prototype looks like. What is the core question? What is the absolute
   minimum code needed to answer it? What can be skipped?

4. **Create the prototype directory**: `prototypes/[concept-name]/` where
   `[concept-name]` is a short, kebab-case identifier derived from the concept.

5. **Implement the prototype** in the isolated directory. Every file must begin
   with:

   ```js
   // PROTOTYPE - NOT FOR PRODUCTION
   // Question: [Core question being tested]
   // Date: [Current date]
   ```
   Standards are intentionally relaxed:
   - Hardcode values freely
   - Use placeholder assets
   - Skip error handling
   - Use the simplest approach that works
   - Copy code rather than importing from production

6. **Test the concept**: Run the prototype. Observe behavior. Collect any
   measurable data (frame times, interaction counts, feel assessments).

7. **Generate the Prototype Report** and save it to
   `prototypes/[concept-name]/REPORT.md`:

```markdown
## Prototype Report: [Concept Name]

### Hypothesis
[What we expected to be true -- the question we set out to answer]

### Approach
[What we built, how long it took, what shortcuts we took]

### Result
[What actually happened -- specific observations, not opinions]

### Metrics
[Any measurable data collected during testing]
- Frame time: [if relevant]
- Feel assessment: [subjective but specific -- "response felt sluggish at
  200ms delay" not "felt bad"]
- User action counts: [if relevant]
- Iteration count: [how many attempts to get it working]

### Recommendation: [PROCEED / PIVOT / KILL]

[One paragraph explaining the recommendation with evidence]

### If Proceeding
[What needs to change for a production-quality implementation]
- Architecture requirements
- Performance targets
- Scope adjustments from the original design
- Estimated production effort

### If Pivoting
[What alternative direction the results suggest]

### If Killing
[Why this concept does not work and what we should do instead]

### Lessons Learned
[Discoveries that affect other systems or future work]
```

8. **Output a summary** to the user with: the core question, the result, and
   the recommendation. Link to the full report at
   `prototypes/[concept-name]/REPORT.md`.

### Important Constraints

- Prototype code must NEVER import from production source files
- Production code must NEVER import from prototype directories
- If the recommendation is PROCEED, the production implementation must be
  written from scratch -- prototype code is not refactored into production
- Total prototype effort should be timeboxed to 1-3 days equivalent of work
- If the prototype scope starts growing, stop and reassess whether the
  question can be simplified

## Protocol

- **Question**: Reads concept from argument; if vague, states the core hypothesis explicitly before proceeding
- **Options**: Skip
- **Decision**: Prototype plan (3-5 bullets) shown and confirmed before implementation begins
- **Draft**: REPORT.md summary shown before saving
- **Approval**: "May I create `prototypes/[concept-name]/` and implement the prototype?"

## Output

Deliver exactly:

- **Prototype code** in `prototypes/[concept-name]/` (throwaway — never imported by `src/`)
- **Report** saved to `prototypes/[concept-name]/REPORT.md`
- **Hypothesis verdict**: `VALIDATED` / `INVALIDATED` / `INCONCLUSIVE`
- **Recommendation**: `PROCEED` (rewrite from scratch in `src/`) / `PIVOT` / `ABANDON`

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.