Skip to content
Back to skills

Hotfix

ASecurity

Executes a hotfix workflow: creates a hotfix branch, applies the targeted fix, runs verification, and prepares release artifacts. Use when a critical production bug needs immediate patching or when the user mentions hotfix or emergency fix.

  • 71 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aibashtestingrefactoringgitsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add tranhieutt/software_development_department --skill hotfix --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Hotfix?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Hotfix
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tranhieutt-hotfix/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tranhieutt-hotfix)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: hotfix
type: workflow
description: "Executes a hotfix workflow: creates a hotfix branch, applies the targeted fix, runs verification, and prepares release artifacts. Use when a critical production bug needs immediate patching or when the user mentions hotfix or emergency fix."
argument-hint: "[bug-id or description]"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash
effort: 2
when_to_use: "When an emergency production bug requires immediate fix bypassing normal sprint processes"
---
When this skill is invoked:

> **Explicit invocation only**: This skill should only run when the user explicitly requests it with `/hotfix`. Do not auto-invoke based on context matching.

1. **Assess the emergency** — Read the bug description or ID. Determine severity:
   - **S1 (Critical)**: Product unplayable, data loss, security vulnerability — hotfix immediately
   - **S2 (Major)**: Significant feature broken, workaround exists — hotfix within 24 hours
   - If severity is S3 or lower, recommend using the normal bug fix workflow instead

2. **Create the hotfix record** at `production/hotfixes/hotfix-[date]-[short-name].md`:

   ```markdown
   ## Hotfix: [Short Description]
   Date: [Date]
   Severity: [S1/S2]
   Reporter: [Who found it]
   Status: IN PROGRESS

   ### Problem
   [Clear description of what is broken and the user impact]

   ### Root Cause
   [To be filled during investigation]

   ### Fix
   [To be filled during implementation]

   ### Testing
   [What was tested and how]

   ### Approvals
   - [ ] Fix reviewed by lead-programmer
   - [ ] Regression test passed (qa-engineer)
   - [ ] Release approved (producer)

   ### Rollback Plan
   [How to revert if the fix causes new issues]
   ```

3. **Create the hotfix branch** (if git is initialized):
   ```
   git checkout -b hotfix/[short-name] [release-tag-or-main]
   ```

4. **Investigate and implement the fix** — Focus on the minimal change that resolves the issue. Do NOT refactor, clean up, or add features alongside the hotfix.

5. **Validate the fix** — Run targeted tests for the affected system. Check for regressions in adjacent systems.

6. **Update the hotfix record** with root cause, fix details, and test results.

6b. **Collect approvals** — Use the Task tool to request sign-off:
   - `subagent_type: lead-programmer` — Review the fix for correctness and side effects
   - `subagent_type: qa-engineer` — Run targeted regression tests on the affected system
   - `subagent_type: producer` — Approve deployment timing and communication plan

7. **Output a summary** with: severity, root cause, fix applied, testing status, and what approvals are still needed before deployment.

### Rules
- Hotfixes must be the MINIMUM change to fix the issue — no cleanup, no refactoring, no "while we're here" changes
- Every hotfix must have a rollback plan documented before deployment
- Hotfix branches merge to BOTH the release branch AND the development branch
- All hotfixes require a post-incident review within 48 hours
- If the fix is complex enough to need more than 4 hours, escalate to technical-director for a scope decision

## Protocol

- **Question**: Confirms severity (S1/S2 = proceed; S3+ = defer to normal workflow)
- **Options**: Skip — severity drives path
- **Decision**: User approves fix approach before implementation begins
- **Draft**: Hotfix summary shown before committing fix
- **Approval**: "May I write to `production/hotfixes/hotfix-[date]-[name].md`?"

## Output

Deliver exactly:

- **Hotfix summary**: severity, root cause (1 sentence), fix applied, files changed
- **Rollback plan**: documented steps to revert if the fix causes regressions
- **Approvals needed**: list of sign-offs still outstanding before deployment
- **Post-incident review**: scheduled within 48 hours (link to `/postmortem-writing`)

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.