Back to skills
SKILL.md
2678 Polish Guide F2f26d02
ASecurity- Prefer active voice, sentences < 25 words avg - Eliminate hedge words: "somewhat", "rather", "quite" - Strong verbs: "demonstrate" > "show", "employ" > "use", "achieve" > "get" - Never start Introduction with "In this paper, we..." - Transformations: "In order to" → "To", "It can be seen that" → (delete)
- 9 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 1 view
- Added October 11, 2026
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 2678-polish_guide_f2f26d02 --agent claude-codeAre you the author of 2678 Polish Guide F2f26d02?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-2678-polish-guide-f2f26d02)# Polish Guide
## Style Targets
### Style A: Plain Precise
- Prefer active voice, sentences < 25 words avg
- Eliminate hedge words: "somewhat", "rather", "quite"
- Strong verbs: "demonstrate" > "show", "employ" > "use", "achieve" > "get"
- Never start Introduction with "In this paper, we..."
- Transformations: "In order to" → "To", "It can be seen that" → (delete)
### Style B: Narrative Fluent
- Topic sentence must preview the paragraph
- Add 1-2 sentence bridges between sections
- Replace dangling "this" with explicit noun
- Signpost transitions: "Building on this,", "Crucially,"
- Abstract structure: Problem → Why hard → Our approach → Key result
### Style C: Formal Academic
- Passive voice acceptable in Methods/Results
- Hedge empirical claims: "suggests", "indicates", "appears to"
- Formal vocabulary: "investigate" > "look at", "substantial" > "big"
- Full sentences in all captions (not fragments)
---
## Critic Protocol
### blocks_mentor = true Criteria
Set ONLY when:
1. logic_score <= 2 (argument is so broken polish is premature), OR
2. Section is structurally absent (not detected), OR
3. A Critical-severity blocker applies to this section
### Logic Score Rubric (1-5)
- 5: Perfect flow, every claim justified
- 4: Minor gap, one unjustified assumption
- 3: Noticeable gaps, would confuse careful reviewer
- 2: Major errors, unsupported claims, missing baselines → blocks_mentor
- 1: Fundamental incoherence → blocks_mentor
### Expression Score Rubric (1-5)
- 5: Publication-ready, no improvement needed
- 4: 1-3 weak sentences per section
- 3: Several awkward constructions
- 2: Heavy polish needed
- 1: Largely unclear
---
## Mentor Protocol
### Priority Order
1. Clarity blockers (unparseable sentences)
2. Style-specific transformations (A/B/C rules above)
3. Critic top_issues in order
4. Pre-check expression_issues for this section
5. Word-level improvements
### Forbidden Mentor Actions
- Rewriting entire paragraphs without showing original
- Changing cited claims or adding/removing citations
- Adding new technical content
- Removing limitations or negative results
### Context Window Management
- Mentor receives ONLY the target section via Read(offset=start-1, limit=end-start+1)
- For sections > 1200 words: orchestrator splits at subsection boundaries,
spawns two Mentor calls
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.