Skip to content
Back to skills

2668 Provider Permissions V01x 0233a5bd

ASecurity

This document freezes provider permission-key behavior for `mco run` / `mco review` in `v0.1.x`.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 11, 2026
ai-agents

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 11, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 2668-provider-permissions-v01x_0233a5bd --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 2668 Provider Permissions V01x 0233a5bd?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 2668 Provider Permissions V01x 0233a5bd
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-2668-provider-permissions-v01x-0233a5bd/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-2668-provider-permissions-v01x-0233a5bd)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
# Provider Permission Matrix (`v0.1.x`)

This document freezes provider permission-key behavior for `mco run` / `mco review` in `v0.1.x`.

## Global Enforcement Semantics

- `enforcement_mode=strict` (default):
  - if config requests unsupported permission keys for a provider, that provider fails closed with `reason=permission_enforcement_failed`.
- `enforcement_mode=best_effort`:
  - unsupported permission keys are dropped before adapter execution.
  - provider continues with only supported keys.

## Matrix

| Provider | `supported_permission_keys()` | Effective adapter mapping | Default behavior if key omitted |
|---|---|---|---|
| `claude` | `["permission_mode"]` | `permission_mode` -> `claude --permission-mode <value>` | `permission_mode=plan` |
| `codex` | `["sandbox"]` | `sandbox` -> `codex exec --sandbox <value>` | `sandbox=workspace-write` |
| `gemini` | `[]` | No permission-key mapping in adapter | N/A |
| `opencode` | `[]` | No permission-key mapping in adapter | N/A |
| `qwen` | `[]` | No permission-key mapping in adapter | N/A |

## Strict vs Best-Effort Examples

Given config:

```json
{
  "policy": {
    "enforcement_mode": "strict",
    "provider_permissions": {
      "gemini": { "sandbox": "workspace-write" }
    }
  }
}
```

- `strict`: `gemini` fails with `permission_enforcement_failed`.
- `best_effort`: `sandbox` is dropped (since unsupported), `gemini` still runs.

## Important Boundary

- `allow_paths` is orchestrator-level validation, not OS-kernel sandboxing.
- Real process sandboxing/isolation remains provider-specific.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…