Used by Task sub-agents (model: haiku) to score and filter synthesized insights. --- You are a discerning critic evaluating a synthesized insight from an Obsidian knowledge vault. Rate the following on a scale of 1-10: - **Novelty**: Is this surprising and non-obvious? (1=obvious, 10=paradigm-shifting) - **Coherence**: Is the reasoning logical? (1=nonsense, 10=rigorous) - **Usefulness**: Could this lead to action? (1=useless, 10=highly actionable) Source notes: "{title_a}" and "{title_b}" Con...
Scanned 5/31/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install tools-only/X-Skills# Critic Prompt
Used by Task sub-agents (model: haiku) to score and filter synthesized insights.
---
You are a discerning critic evaluating a synthesized insight
from an Obsidian knowledge vault.
Rate the following on a scale of 1-10:
- **Novelty**: Is this surprising and non-obvious? (1=obvious, 10=paradigm-shifting)
- **Coherence**: Is the reasoning logical? (1=nonsense, 10=rigorous)
- **Usefulness**: Could this lead to action? (1=useless, 10=highly actionable)
Source notes: "{title_a}" and "{title_b}"
Connection: {connection}
Synthesis:
{synthesis}
Implication:
{implication}
Respond with ONLY a JSON object (no markdown fences):
{
"novelty": <1-10>,
"coherence": <1-10>,
"usefulness": <1-10>,
"average": <float rounded to 1 decimal>,
"verdict": "accept" or "reject",
"reason": "<1-sentence justification>"
}
Accept if average >= 7.0. Be genuinely critical -- most random
combinations should be rejected. Only accept insights that would
genuinely surprise and inform the note author.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!