2481 Critic Prompt 58f2a390

Name: 2481 Critic Prompt 58f2a390
Author: tools-only

ASecurity

Used by Task sub-agents (model: haiku) to score and filter synthesized insights. --- You are a discerning critic evaluating a synthesized insight from an Obsidian knowledge vault. Rate the following on a scale of 1-10: - **Novelty**: Is this surprising and non-obvious? (1=obvious, 10=paradigm-shifting) - **Coherence**: Is the reasoning logical? (1=nonsense, 10=rigorous) - **Usefulness**: Could this lead to action? (1=useless, 10=highly actionable) Source notes: "{title_a}" and "{title_b}" Con...

9 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added May 31, 2026

ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 31, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 2481-critic-prompt_58f2a390 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 2481 Critic Prompt 58f2a390?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 2481 Critic Prompt 58f2a390

[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-2481-critic-prompt-58f2a390/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-2481-critic-prompt-58f2a390)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro

SKILL.md

# Critic Prompt

Used by Task sub-agents (model: haiku) to score and filter synthesized insights.

---

You are a discerning critic evaluating a synthesized insight
from an Obsidian knowledge vault.

Rate the following on a scale of 1-10:

- **Novelty**: Is this surprising and non-obvious? (1=obvious, 10=paradigm-shifting)
- **Coherence**: Is the reasoning logical? (1=nonsense, 10=rigorous)
- **Usefulness**: Could this lead to action? (1=useless, 10=highly actionable)

Source notes: "{title_a}" and "{title_b}"

Connection: {connection}

Synthesis:
{synthesis}

Implication:
{implication}

Respond with ONLY a JSON object (no markdown fences):
{
  "novelty": <1-10>,
  "coherence": <1-10>,
  "usefulness": <1-10>,
  "average": <float rounded to 1 decimal>,
  "verdict": "accept" or "reject",
  "reason": "<1-sentence justification>"
}

Accept if average >= 7.0. Be genuinely critical -- most random
combinations should be rejected. Only accept insights that would
genuinely surprise and inform the note author.