Skip to content
Back to skills

204 Synthesize 1ba4b73e

ASecurity

Synthesize discovery findings into a consolidated analysis document with proposed tickets

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 31, 2026
researchgoapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 31, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 204-synthesize_1ba4b73e --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 204 Synthesize 1ba4b73e?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 204 Synthesize 1ba4b73e
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-204-synthesize-1ba4b73e/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-204-synthesize-1ba4b73e)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
description: Synthesize discovery findings into a consolidated analysis document with proposed tickets
argument-hint: <source-url> [source-url...] [--target=<epic-key>]
---

# Synthesize Discovery Findings

**Arguments:** $ARGUMENTS

---

## Argument Parsing

Parse the arguments to extract:
- `{Source_URLs}` - One or more Confluence document URLs (space-separated)
- `{Target_Epic}` - Optional target implementation epic (via `--target=CC-XX`)

**Examples:**
- `/synthesize-discovery https://confluence/doc1` → Single source, auto-detect target epics
- `/synthesize-discovery https://confluence/doc1 https://confluence/doc2` → Multiple sources
- `/synthesize-discovery https://confluence/doc1 --target=CC-62` → Single source, specific target epic
- `/synthesize-discovery doc1-url doc2-url doc3-url --target=CC-62` → Multiple sources, specific target

**Supported Source Types:**
- Discovery Documents (from `/create-epic-discovery`)
- Research findings documents
- Interview summaries
- Technical spike reports
- Competitive analysis documents
- Any Confluence page with structured findings

---

## Workflow Chain

```
/create-epic-discovery <epic-key>  → Discovery Document
         ↓
[Manual research, interviews, experiments]
         ↓
/synthesize-discovery <doc-urls...>  → Synthesis Document (YOU ARE HERE)
         ↓
/approve-synthesis <synthesis-url>  → Creates Jira Tickets
         ↓
/create-implementation-plan <overview-doc>  → Implementation planning continues
```

---

## Phase 0: Source Retrieval

1. **Fetch all source documents** from the provided URLs

2. **Extract from each source:**
   - Document type (discovery doc, research findings, spike report, etc.)
   - Key findings and insights
   - Validated/invalidated hypotheses
   - Answered research questions
   - Remaining unknowns
   - Recommendations

3. **Identify target implementation epics:**
   - If `--target` specified, use that epic
   - Otherwise, extract from "Target Implementation Epics" sections
   - If none found, ask user to specify

4. **FAILURE CONDITION - Missing Information:**

   If sources cannot be fetched or no target epics identified:

   **STOP and prompt the user:**
   ```
   I was unable to retrieve required information.

   Sources Retrieved: [count]/[total]
   Failed Sources: [list URLs that failed]
   Target Epics Found: [list or "None"]

   Please provide:
   1. Confirm source URLs are accessible
   2. Target implementation epic(s): [e.g., CC-62, CC-60]
   ```

   **DO NOT PROCEED** until confirmed.

5. **MANDATORY CHECKPOINT - Sources Confirmation:**

   ```
   Please confirm before I proceed:

   Sources to Synthesize:
   1. [URL] - [Document Title] ([type])
   2. [URL] - [Document Title] ([type])
   ...

   Target Implementation Epic(s): [list]

   Is this correct? (Yes / No / Correct)
   ```

   **DO NOT PROCEED** without explicit user confirmation.

---

## Phase 1: Cross-Source Analysis

1. **Consolidate findings across all sources:**
   - Merge hypothesis validation results
   - Combine research question answers
   - Identify consistent themes
   - Note contradictions or conflicts

2. **Create findings inventory:**

   | Finding ID | Source(s) | Category | Finding | Confidence | Actionable |
   |------------|-----------|----------|---------|------------|------------|
   | F1 | Doc1, Doc2 | User Need | Users want X | High | Yes |
   | F2 | Doc1 | Technical | API supports Y | Med | Yes |
   | F3 | Doc3 | Business | ROI is Z | Low | Needs validation |

3. **Identify patterns:**
   - Recurring themes across sources
   - Convergent conclusions
   - Divergent opinions requiring resolution

4. **Catalog remaining unknowns:**
   - Questions still unanswered
   - New questions that emerged
   - Areas needing further research

---

## Phase 2: Recommendation Generation

1. **Generate feature recommendations:**
   For each actionable finding, determine:
   - Should this become a ticket?
   - What type of work is it? (Feature, Enhancement, Spike, Research)
   - Which implementation epic does it belong to?
   - What's the priority based on findings?
   - Are there dependencies on other recommendations?

2. **Create recommendation matrix:**

   | Rec ID | Based On | Title | Type | Target Epic | Priority | Dependencies |
   |--------|----------|-------|------|-------------|----------|--------------|
   | R1 | F1, F2 | Implement X feature | Story | CC-62 | High | None |
   | R2 | F3 | Validate ROI assumption | Spike | CC-60 | Med | R1 |
   | R3 | F1 | Design user flow for X | Task | CC-62 | High | None |

3. **Identify scope decisions needed:**
   - Features that could go multiple directions
   - Trade-offs requiring stakeholder input
   - MVP vs future phase decisions

---

## Phase 3: Synthesis Document Creation

Create a comprehensive synthesis document:

### 1. Synthesis Overview
- **Discovery Epic:** Link to original discovery epic
- **Sources Analyzed:** List all source documents with links
- **Synthesis Date:** When this synthesis was created
- **Target Implementation Epics:** Links to target epics

### 2. Executive Summary
- **Key Insight:** One-paragraph summary of most important discovery
- **Recommendation:** High-level direction based on findings
- **Confidence Level:** Overall confidence in recommendations
- **Major Decisions Needed:** List any blocking decisions

### 3. Consolidated Findings

#### Validated Hypotheses
| ID | Original Hypothesis | Validation Status | Evidence | Implications |
|----|---------------------|-------------------|----------|--------------|
| H1 | [statement] | Validated | [sources] | [what this means] |
| H2 | [statement] | Partially Validated | [sources] | [caveats] |
| H3 | [statement] | Invalidated | [sources] | [pivot needed] |

#### Research Questions Answered
| ID | Question | Answer | Confidence | Source(s) |
|----|----------|--------|------------|-----------|
| Q1 | [question] | [answer] | High/Med/Low | [docs] |

#### Key Insights
Narrative summary of the most important learnings, organized by theme:

**User/Customer Insights:**
- [Insight with supporting evidence]

**Technical Insights:**
- [Insight with supporting evidence]

**Business Insights:**
- [Insight with supporting evidence]

### 4. Remaining Unknowns

| ID | Unknown | Impact | Recommendation | Priority |
|----|---------|--------|----------------|----------|
| U1 | [what we don't know] | [why it matters] | [next step] | High/Med/Low |

### 5. Recommendations by Epic

For each target implementation epic:

#### {Epic_Key}: {Epic_Title}

**Recommended Tickets:**

| # | Title | Type | Priority | Story Points | Dependencies | Based On |
|---|-------|------|----------|--------------|--------------|----------|
| 1 | [title] | Story | High | 5 | None | F1, F2 |
| 2 | [title] | Task | Med | 3 | #1 | F3 |

**Scope Recommendations:**
- What should be included in MVP
- What should be deferred to future phases
- What should NOT be built based on findings

**Risk Adjustments:**
- New risks identified from discovery
- Updated risk levels based on findings
- Mitigation strategies learned

### 6. Decision Log

Decisions that need to be made before implementation:

| Decision | Options | Recommendation | Rationale | Owner | Deadline |
|----------|---------|----------------|-----------|-------|----------|
| [decision] | A, B, C | B | [why] | [who] | [when] |

### 6a. Blocking Decisions

**Status:** [Pending Resolution / All Resolved]

Decisions that MUST be resolved before tickets can be created:

| ID | Decision | Options | Status | Resolution | Resolved By | Date |
|----|----------|---------|--------|------------|-------------|------|
| D1 | [decision question] | A, B, C | Pending | - | - | - |

**Impact:** Tickets [T1, T3, T5] are blocked until all decisions are resolved.

*Note: Use `/approve-synthesis` to resolve these decisions and create tickets.*

### 7. Source Cross-Reference

Map findings back to sources:

| Source | Key Contributions | Findings Referenced |
|--------|-------------------|---------------------|
| [Doc1 URL] | [what this doc contributed] | F1, F2, F5 |
| [Doc2 URL] | [what this doc contributed] | F3, F4 |

### 8. Appendix: Full Findings Inventory

Complete list of all findings extracted from sources with full detail.

### 9. Proposed Tickets Data

**Status:** Pending Approval
**Last Updated:** [timestamp]

<!-- PROPOSED_TICKETS_START -->
```json
{
  "version": "1.0",
  "synthesis_url": "[this document URL]",
  "discovery_epic": "[Discovery Epic Key]",
  "blocking_decisions": [
    {
      "id": "D1",
      "question": "[decision question]",
      "options": ["A", "B", "C"],
      "status": "pending",
      "resolution": null,
      "blocks_tickets": ["T1", "T3"]
    }
  ],
  "proposed_tickets": [
    {
      "id": "T1",
      "title": "[Ticket title]",
      "type": "Story",
      "target_epic": "CC-62",
      "priority": "High",
      "story_points": 5,
      "dependencies": [],
      "blocked_by_decisions": ["D1"],
      "based_on_findings": ["F1", "F2"],
      "description": "[Full ticket description]",
      "acceptance_criteria": [
        "Criterion 1",
        "Criterion 2"
      ],
      "notes_from_discovery": "[Relevant insights]"
    }
  ],
  "approval_status": "pending",
  "approved_by": null,
  "approved_date": null
}
```
<!-- PROPOSED_TICKETS_END -->

*This section is machine-readable and used by `/approve-synthesis` command.*

---

## Phase 4: Review & Approval

**MANDATORY CHECKPOINT - Synthesis Review:**

```
## Synthesis Document Preview

[Full synthesis document content]

---

Summary:
- Sources Analyzed: [count]
- Findings Extracted: [count]
- Hypotheses Validated: [count] / Invalidated: [count]
- Proposed Tickets: [count]
- Blocking Decisions: [count] pending
- Target Epics: [list]

Ready to publish synthesis document? (Yes / No / Modify)
```

- **Yes** → Publish synthesis document to Confluence
- **No** → Ask what changes are needed
- **Modify** → User provides feedback, regenerate

**DO NOT PROCEED** without explicit approval.

---

## Phase 5: Publish & Output

1. **Publish synthesis document** to Confluence:
   - Location: `/epics/Discovery/{Discovery_Epic_Key}/Synthesis/`
   - Title: "{Discovery_Epic_Key} Synthesis - [Date]"

2. **Update discovery document** with link to synthesis

3. **Update target epic(s)** with:
   - Link to synthesis document
   - Summary of proposed tickets (not created yet)

---

## Output

**When complete, you MUST provide:**

```
## Discovery Synthesis Complete!

**Synthesis Document:** {Synthesis_Document_URL}

### Sources Analyzed
1. [Doc1 Title]({url})
2. [Doc2 Title]({url})
...

### Summary
- Total Findings: [count]
- Validated Hypotheses: [count]
- Invalidated Hypotheses: [count]
- Remaining Unknowns: [count]

### Proposed Tickets Summary

**Total Proposed:** [count] tickets, [sum] story points
**Blocking Decisions:** [count] pending

#### By Epic:
- {Epic_Key_1}: [count] tickets ([sum] points)
- {Epic_Key_2}: [count] tickets ([sum] points)

### Blocking Decisions
1. [D1: Decision needing resolution]
2. [D2: Decision needing resolution]

### Next Steps
1. Review the synthesis document
2. Resolve blocking decisions
3. Run ticket approval:

/approve-synthesis {Synthesis_Document_URL}
```

---

## Failure Conditions

| Condition | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Source URL not accessible | List failed URLs, ask for alternatives |
| No target epic specified or found | Ask user to specify target epic(s) |
| Conflicting findings across sources | Document conflicts, ask user to resolve |
| Confluence publish fails | Provide document content for manual publishing |

---

## Agent Delegation

**Before synthesis:**

- **Document Analysis:** Use Explore agents to analyze each source document in parallel
- **Pattern Recognition:** Identify themes and patterns across sources
- **Cross-Reference:** Map findings to their sources

**During document creation:**

- **Validation:** Verify target epics exist and are accessible
- **Decision Identification:** Flag decisions that will block ticket creation

Files in this skill

  • README.md855 B
  • skill.md11.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.