Skip to content
Back to skills

200 Fn 21 Rqz Dd4a0126

ASecurity

PR #73 migrated from RP's `--response-type review` back to manual prompt building because the two-step approach was too brittle.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 11, 2026
testing

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 11, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 200-fn-21-rqz_dd4a0126 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 200 Fn 21 Rqz Dd4a0126?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 200 Fn 21 Rqz Dd4a0126
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-200-fn-21-rqz-dd4a0126/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-200-fn-21-rqz-dd4a0126)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
# Revisit RP context_builder + chat_send for reviews

## Background

PR #73 migrated from RP's `--response-type review` back to manual prompt building because the two-step approach was too brittle.

## Current approach (manual prompt building)
1. `setup-review` → context building
2. `prompt-get` → get builder's handoff
3. Build custom prompt with explicit verdict tag requirement
4. `chat-send` → single message with our prompt

## Alternative tested (2026-01-26)

Tested `context_builder` (no response_type) → `chat_send` with verdict in message:
- Discovery worked: builder selected relevant files
- Verdict came back when included in chat message
- BUT: Previously tried and found brittle

## Why it was brittle (from PR #73)
- RP's `--response-type review` returns its own verdict format (request-changes, approve)
- Required follow-up message to get `<verdict>...</verdict>` tags
- Timing/reliability issues

## Eric's suggestion (pvncher)
- "You can edit the review prompt" in RP settings
- "Prompt your way there" - add XML tags in instructions
- Problem: Can't require all users to change RP settings

## Tasks when revisited
1. Test `context_builder` (no response_type) → `chat_send --mode review` with verdict in message
2. Verify reliability over multiple runs
3. Compare token usage vs manual approach
4. Check if RP has programmatic way to set review prompt defaults

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.