Skip to content
Back to skills

1190 Interview 34fc18bb

ASecurity

Interview me to gather context for planning or refining work

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 11, 2026
documentationgogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 11, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 1190-interview_34fc18bb --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 1190 Interview 34fc18bb?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 1190 Interview 34fc18bb
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-1190-interview-34fc18bb/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-1190-interview-34fc18bb)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
---
description: Interview me to gather context for planning or refining work
allowed-tools: Glob, Grep, Read, Task
---

## Phase 1: Gather Context (do this silently before asking questions)

1. **Find existing plans** - Search for files with "plan" in the name (case-insensitive). Read any you find.
2. **Understand the codebase** - Use the Explore agent to get a quick sense of the project structure, tech stack, and patterns.
3. **Check recent work** - Look at recent git history or TODO comments if relevant.

Based on what you find, tailor your questions. If a plan exists, your goal is to refine it. If not, your goal is to create one.

## Phase 2: Interview

Ask questions **one at a time**. Wait for each answer before proceeding.

Use your gathered context to ask sharper questions. Don't ask about things you already know from the codebase. Instead, focus on:

- Gaps in the existing plan (if one exists)
- Ambiguities or decisions that need human input
- Goals, constraints, and scope that aren't clear from the code
- Risks or concerns the user might have

Cover these areas as relevant:

- **Goal**: What problem are we solving? What does success look like?
- **Constraints**: Technical limitations, deadlines, dependencies, non-negotiables?
- **Users**: Who is this for? What do they care about?
- **Scope**: What's in/out? What's the MVP vs. nice-to-have?
- **Risks**: What could go wrong? What are you uncertain about?

Aim for 4-8 questions. Adapt based on responses—follow interesting threads, dig deeper when something's unclear.

### Response Suggestions

With **each question**, provide 3-5 numbered response suggestions based on:

- What you learned from the codebase context
- Common answers for this type of project/question
- Reasonable inferences from the conversation so far

Format:

```
[Your question here]

1. [Most likely answer based on context]
2. [Second most likely]
3. [Third option]
4. [Alternative perspective]
5. (if needed) [Edge case or "none of these"]
```

The user can reply with just a number (e.g., "2") if a suggestion matches their intent, or provide their own answer. This reduces friction while still allowing full elaboration when needed.

**Suggestion quality matters**: Don't pad with obvious or unhelpful options. Each suggestion should be a plausible, distinct answer that could genuinely apply. If you can only think of 2-3 good suggestions, only list those.

## Phase 3: Plan Output

After the interview, either:

- **Create a new plan** if none exists
- **Revise the existing plan** based on new information

The plan format should fit the context. Consider including sections like:

- Problem/goal
- Approach
- Key decisions made
- Open questions
- Next steps or milestones

Save the plan to `.claude/plans/` (create the directory if needed). Use a descriptive filename like `feature-name-plan.md`. Only ask about location if the user has a specific preference.

## Tone

Be direct and curious. Ask "why" when motivations aren't clear. Challenge assumptions gently if something seems off. The goal is shared understanding, not just collecting answers.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…