Skip to content
Back to skills

097 Index 9a8b6735

ASecurity

Automated multi-mode paper auditing for LaTeX, Typst, and PDF documents.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 11, 2026
researchpythongobashapidatabase

Works with

  • claude code
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 11, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 097-index_9a8b6735 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 097 Index 9a8b6735?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 097 Index 9a8b6735
[![Security: A β€” Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-097-index-9a8b6735/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-097-index-9a8b6735)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
# Paper Audit (paper-audit)

Automated multi-mode paper auditing for LaTeX, Typst, and PDF documents.

## Overview

The `paper-audit` skill provides comprehensive automated auditing for academic papers in multiple formats (`.tex`, `.typ`, `.pdf`). It orchestrates multiple specialized checkers and generates structured reports with severity-rated issues and quality scores.

### Key Features

- **Multi-format Support**: LaTeX (`.tex`), Typst (`.typ`), and PDF (`.pdf`) inputs
- **Three Audit Modes**: self-check (comprehensive), review (peer-review focused), gate (submission readiness)
- **PDF Visual Layout Check**: Detects margin overflow, block overlaps, font inconsistency, low-resolution images, blank pages
- **Reference Integrity Check**: Undefined references, unreferenced labels, missing captions, forward references, numbering gaps
- **ScholarEval Assessment**: 8-dimension quality scoring (1–10 scale) with publication readiness label
- **Online Bibliography Verification**: CrossRef + Semantic Scholar API validation (no API key required)
- **NeurIPS-aligned Scoring**: Quality/Clarity/Significance/Originality dimensions (1–6 scale)

## Audit Modes

| Mode | Description | Checks Included |
|------|-------------|-----------------|
| `self-check` | Comprehensive pre-revision audit | All modules |
| `review` | Peer-review simulation | grammar, logic, figures, references, visual |
| `gate` | Submission readiness gate | format, bib, references, visual |

## Using the Skill in Claude Code

Simply mention relevant trigger words in your conversation:

```
Run a full audit on my paper before submission
```

```
Check paper quality with ScholarEval assessment
```

```
Audit my PDF for layout issues
```

### Argument Conventions

- **File path** (required): `.tex`, `.typ`, or `.pdf`
- **Mode** (optional): `self-check` (default), `review`, `gate`
- **Flags** (optional): `--online` for bibliography verification, `--scholar-eval` for ScholarEval

### Script CLI

```bash
# Basic audit (auto-detects mode)
python scripts/audit.py paper.tex --mode self-check

# With online bibliography verification
python scripts/audit.py paper.tex --mode review --online

# With ScholarEval 8-dimension assessment
python scripts/audit.py paper.tex --mode self-check --scholar-eval

# PDF audit (visual + extracted text checks)
python scripts/audit.py paper.pdf --mode gate

# Full audit with all options
python scripts/audit.py paper.tex --mode self-check --online --scholar-eval --email you@example.com
```

## Check Modules

| Module | Trigger | Formats | Description |
|--------|---------|---------|-------------|
| `grammar` | grammar, proofread | tex, typ, pdf | Grammar analysis |
| `sentences` | long sentence | tex, typ, pdf | Long sentence detection |
| `logic` | logic, coherence | tex, typ, pdf | Paragraph coherence (AXES model) |
| `format` | format, lint | tex, typ | Format checking |
| `figures` | figures, images | tex, typ | Figure quality check |
| `references` | ref, label | tex, typ | Reference integrity πŸ†• |
| `visual` | visual, layout | **pdf only** | PDF visual layout πŸ†• |
| `bib` | bib, bibliography | tex, typ | Bibliography verification |
| `deai` | deai, humanize | tex, typ, pdf | De-AI trace detection |

## Reference Integrity Module

Checks figure and table references for completeness.

### Checks Performed

| Check | Description | Severity |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Undefined references | `\ref{fig:x}` with no `\label{fig:x}` | Critical |
| Unreferenced labels | `\label{fig:x}` never cited | Minor |
| Missing captions | Figure/table environment without `\caption` | Major |
| Forward references | First `\ref` appears before `\label` | Minor |
| Numbering gaps | `fig:1`, `fig:3` without `fig:2` | Minor |

### Script CLI

```bash
# LaTeX files
python scripts/check_references.py main.tex

# Typst files
python scripts/check_references.py main.typ

# JSON output
python scripts/check_references.py main.tex --json
```

## PDF Visual Layout Module

Analyzes camera-ready PDF for typesetting issues.

### Checks Performed

| Check | Method | Severity |
|-------|--------|----------|
| Margin overflow | Text bbox vs page margin (default 72pt) | Major |
| Block overlaps | Bounding box intersection area > 100 sq pt | Critical |
| Font inconsistency | >2 distinct body fonts (9–13pt) | Minor |
| Low-resolution images | Effective DPI < 150 | Major |
| Blank pages | Pages with no text or images | Minor |

### Script CLI

```bash
python scripts/visual_check.py paper.pdf
python scripts/visual_check.py paper.pdf --margin 72 --min-dpi 150
python scripts/visual_check.py paper.pdf --json
```

## ScholarEval Assessment Module

8-dimension academic quality scoring based on ScholarEval (arXiv:2510.16234).

### Dimensions

| Dimension | Weight | Source | Description |
|-----------|--------|--------|-------------|
| Soundness | 20% | script | Logical rigor, claim-evidence alignment |
| Clarity | 15% | script | Grammar, sentence quality, formatting |
| Presentation | 10% | script | Figures, visual layout, references |
| Novelty | 15% | llm | Originality and contribution |
| Significance | 15% | llm | Impact on the field |
| Reproducibility | 10% | mixed | Experiment description completeness |
| Ethics | 5% | llm | Ethical considerations |
| Overall | 10% | computed | Weighted aggregate |

### Publication Readiness Labels

| Score | Label |
|-------|-------|
| 9.0+ | Strong Accept β€” Ready for top venue |
| 8.0+ | Accept β€” Publication ready |
| 7.0+ | Ready with minor revisions |
| 6.0+ | Major revisions needed |
| 5.0+ | Significant rework required |
| <5.0 | Not ready for submission |

### Script CLI

```bash
# From audit JSON output
python scripts/scholar_eval.py --audit-json audit_result.json

# Merge with LLM evaluation
python scripts/scholar_eval.py --audit-json result.json --llm-json llm_scores.json

# JSON output
python scripts/scholar_eval.py --audit-json result.json --json
```

### LLM Assessment Prompt

After running the script-based audit, provide this prompt to Claude with the full paper text:

```
Please read the paper and provide 1-10 scores for these dimensions in JSON format:

{
  "novelty": {
    "score": <1-10>,
    "evidence": "<specific innovations and differences from prior work>"
  },
  "significance": {
    "score": <1-10>,
    "evidence": "<potential impact on the field>"
  },
  "reproducibility_llm": {
    "score": <1-10>,
    "evidence": "<completeness of experimental description, code/data availability>"
  },
  "ethics": {
    "score": <1-10>,
    "evidence": "<ethical considerations, conflicts of interest, data privacy>"
  }
}
```

## Online Bibliography Verification

Verify citation metadata against CrossRef and Semantic Scholar databases.

### Features

- **DOI Verification**: Validates DOI existence and cross-checks year/journal fields
- **Title Search**: Finds papers by title when no DOI is available
- **DOI Suggestions**: Recommends DOIs for entries missing them
- **Rate Limiting**: Built-in polite rate limiting (0.5s between requests)
- **No API Key Required**: Uses public CrossRef and Semantic Scholar APIs

### Usage

Add `--online` flag to the audit command:

```bash
# With online verification
python scripts/audit.py paper.tex --mode self-check --online

# With polite email for faster CrossRef rate limits
python scripts/audit.py paper.tex --online --email you@example.com
```

Or run standalone:

```bash
# Verify bibliography file
python scripts/verify_bib.py references.bib --online --email you@example.com
```

## Output Protocol

All issues use the standard protocol:

```
% REFERENCES (Line 45) [Severity: Critical] [Priority: P0]: Undefined reference: \ref{fig:arch}
% VISUAL (Page 3) [Severity: Major] [Priority: P1]: Content overflows left margin (x=28.3pt, margin=72pt)
% BIB (Line 12) [Severity: Major] [Priority: P1]: Online mismatch for 'smith2020': year: bib=2019 vs api=2020
```

## Report Format

The audit generates a structured Markdown report with:
- Issue list by severity (Critical β†’ Major β†’ Minor)
- NeurIPS-aligned score (Quality/Clarity/Significance/Originality, 1-6 scale)
- ScholarEval 8-dimension table with readiness label (when `--scholar-eval`)
- Online verification summary (when `--online`)

## Recommended Workflows

### Pre-Submission Check

```bash
python scripts/audit.py paper.tex --mode gate --online --email you@example.com
```

### Comprehensive Self-Review

```bash
python scripts/audit.py paper.tex --mode self-check --scholar-eval
```

### PDF Camera-Ready Check

```bash
python scripts/audit.py paper.pdf --mode gate
```

### Full Quality Assessment

```bash
python scripts/audit.py paper.tex --mode self-check --online --scholar-eval --email you@example.com
```

## Reference Files

- `resources/references/SCHOLAR_EVAL_GUIDE.md`: Detailed ScholarEval scoring rubrics

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.