Skip to content
Back to skills

003 Name Skill Eb85dd0c

ASecurity

Plan and route Domain-Driven Design work from strategic modeling to tactical implementation and evented architecture patterns.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 11, 2026
business

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 11, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 003-name-skill_eb85dd0c --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 003 Name Skill Eb85dd0c?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 003 Name Skill Eb85dd0c
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-003-name-skill-eb85dd0c/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-003-name-skill-eb85dd0c)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
---
name: domain-driven-design
description: Plan and route Domain-Driven Design work from strategic modeling to tactical implementation and evented architecture patterns.
risk: safe
source: self
tags: [ddd, domain, bounded-context, architecture]
---

# Domain-Driven Design

## Use this skill when

- You need to model a complex business domain with explicit boundaries.
- You want to decide whether full DDD is worth the added complexity.
- You need to connect strategic design decisions to implementation patterns.
- You are planning CQRS, event sourcing, sagas, or projections from domain needs.

## Do not use this skill when

- The problem is simple CRUD with low business complexity.
- You only need localized bug fixes.
- There is no access to domain knowledge and no proxy product expert.

## Instructions

1. Run a viability check before committing to full DDD.
2. Produce strategic artifacts first: subdomains, bounded contexts, language glossary.
3. Route to specialized skills based on current task.
4. Define success criteria and evidence for each stage.

### Viability check

Use full DDD only when at least two of these are true:

- Business rules are complex or fast-changing.
- Multiple teams are causing model collisions.
- Integration contracts are unstable.
- Auditability and explicit invariants are critical.

### Routing map

- Strategic model and boundaries: `@ddd-strategic-design`
- Cross-context integrations and translation: `@ddd-context-mapping`
- Tactical code modeling: `@ddd-tactical-patterns`
- Read/write separation: `@cqrs-implementation`
- Event history as source of truth: `@event-sourcing-architect` and `@event-store-design`
- Long-running workflows: `@saga-orchestration`
- Read models: `@projection-patterns`
- Decision log: `@architecture-decision-records`

If templates are needed, open `references/ddd-deliverables.md`.

## Output requirements

Always return:

- Scope and assumptions
- Current stage (strategic, tactical, or evented)
- Explicit artifacts produced
- Open risks and next step recommendation

## Examples

```text
Use @domain-driven-design to assess if this billing platform should adopt full DDD.
Then route to the right next skill and list artifacts we must produce this week.
```

## Limitations

- This skill does not replace direct workshops with domain experts.
- It does not provide framework-specific code generation.
- It should not be used as a justification to over-engineer simple systems.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.