Mandatory decision protocol ("Alpha Protocol") for any new STRATEGIC work — never jump to implementation on local recall alone. Run RECALL over the knowledge vault → GAP analysis → emit a DEEP RESEARCH PROMPT to run in external deep-research tools → SYNTHESIS + Decision Memo when results come back. Trigger on "/alfa-search-recall-deepresearch", "alpha protocol", "R+DR", or automatically when starting a strategic decision (new product/feature, tokenomics, GTM, market, investment hypothesis, ar...
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit --skill alfa-search-recall-deepresearch --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Alfa Search Recall Deepresearch?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tonydzi-alfa-search-recall-deepresearch)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: alfa-search-recall-deepresearch
description: >
Mandatory decision protocol ("Alpha Protocol") for any new STRATEGIC work — never jump to
implementation on local recall alone. Run RECALL over the knowledge vault → GAP analysis →
emit a DEEP RESEARCH PROMPT to run in external deep-research tools → SYNTHESIS + Decision Memo
when results come back. Trigger on "/alfa-search-recall-deepresearch", "alpha protocol",
"R+DR", or automatically when starting a strategic decision (new product/feature, tokenomics,
GTM, market, investment hypothesis, architecture). Recall is necessary but NOT sufficient for
strategic work.
license: MIT
---
# 🅰️ Alpha Protocol — Recall + Deep Research before deciding
> 🧒 **When reporting to the operator:** end with a child-simple "In plain words" recap (his standing request; reports TO the operator only).
**Binding rule (must):** For ANY new strategic function, product, business model, tokenomics, AI-functionality, GTM, market, investment hypothesis, or architecture decision — it is **FORBIDDEN to go to implementation on recall alone**. Do `Recall → Gap → Deep Research → Synthesis → Decision Memo` first. Recall is necessary but NOT sufficient for strategic work. Canon: vault note `protocol-alpha-protocol-recall-plus-deep-research`.
## When this fires
- The operator writes the trigger: **`R+DR`** (= **`RDR`** — `+`/space & case don't matter), **`alpha protocol`** (or `/alpha`).
- OR you are about to start a **Level-2** task (below) — invoke this protocol proactively, don't wait for the trigger.
## Levels (size the response to the task)
- **L0 — Quick** (answer a question, fix a bug, tiny tweak): plain recall is enough. No DR.
- **L1 — Recall** (new module / hypothesis / feature / market): recall memory + internal docs + past research + form hypotheses. **Do NOT decide immediately.** Usually no external DR unless it turns strategic.
- **L2 — Recall + DR** (strategic — see binding rule): run the full flow below.
## ★ Proactive multi-agent reflex (EVERY task, not just strategic) — set 2026-06-25
The user FORGETS whether they need agents — so YOU remember and propose, reflexively, after RECALL on **any** task. Canon: vault `reglament-proaktivno-predlagay-agentov` + memory `multi-agent-offer-reflex`; tool-choice canon = `decision-adopt-agent-teams-scoped`.
1. **Cheap-first:** did SQL/grep/RAG already answer it? → done, no agents.
2. **Type = Decision · Comparison · Analysis · Research-synthesis** where several INDEPENDENT lenses materially improve the answer (inclusion test: *will one lens's finding redirect another before both finish?*)? NO (import/fix/ops/mechanical/trivial) → single agent, stay silent about agents. YES → multi-agent fits → fork:
- **AUTO-RUN (announce, don't ask):** read-only · no vault write · no outbound · ~2 Sonnet agents · not huge → spawn advocate↔skeptic (or champion-X↔champion-Y, or N orthogonal lenses) then synthesize. First line: `🤝 Spawning 2 Sonnet agents (read-only)…`.
- **OFFER + ASK (`+`):** vault-write/outbound · ≥3 agents or long/expensive · strategic-irreversible (→ full R+DR L2 below) · money/secrets/Tier-2. One line: `🤝 Agents: I recommend (…); shall I spawn them? (+)`.
3. Teammates on **Sonnet**; don't auto-keep an Opus lead; never ask for "consensus" — preserve dissent. Mechanism = Agent-tool subagents (cheap, ~80% of the value) or native Agent Teams when enabled.
This is **L1.5** — broader than the L2 strategic flow: it fires on everyday comparisons/analysis, not only big decisions. The advocate/skeptic/frontier panel below is the same machinery.
## The flow (what YOU, Claude Code, do)
**Step 1 — RECALL.** Pull EVERYTHING we already have on the topic (per the RECALL-before-activity rule):
- memory: `MEMORY.md` + grep the memory dir
- vault meaning: `python "$IMPORTS_ROOT/brain_ask.py" "<topic>"` (or `/ask`)
- vault exact: grep concepts/insights/protocols/people/leads
- SQLite facts where relevant (Platinum CRM, browser_history, etc.)
Report concisely: what we know · what we already researched · prior conclusions · prior mistakes.
**Step 2 — GAP ANALYSIS.** State plainly: what we do NOT know, which questions stay open. This sharpens the DR prompt so the external tool digs where we're blind, not where we're already strong.
**Step 3-pre — DR-DEDUP: first check whether this DR already exists (operator's order, 2026-07-14).** Plenty of sessions ordered a DR and never carried it to an external LLM; meanwhile the exporters (ChatGPT/Claude/Downloads) may have ALREADY pulled the report into the vault, the nightly `dr_collect.py` (hub, 05:05) flips the registry `issued→collected` on its own and `dr_synthesize` writes the digest — the registry status can be fresher than your memory. Before minting a NEW number, two cheap checks (0 tokens):
1. **The registry:** `grep -i "<topic keywords>" "$OBSIDIAN_VAULT/_DR-Registry.md"` (and/or `dr_registry.py list`) — is there already a DR on this topic, and in what state.
2. **The vault:** digests `03-Insights\insight-DR-*.md` + originals `_originals\deep-research\*<DR-ID>*` (grep by topic/ID).
The fork: **synthesized/collected** → do NOT re-order — read the finished report/digest and go straight to Step 4 (Synthesis); **issued** on the same topic → reuse THAT SAME ID (don't mint a new one) and emit the outbound prompt with it; **nothing** → mint a new one below. Canon: `reglament-numeratsiya-dr-i-reestr`, memory `dr-pipeline-endtoend`.
**Step 3 — DEEP RESEARCH PROMPT (hand-off).** ⭐ FIRST allocate the DR number (operator's order, 2026-07-03): `python $IMPORTS_ROOT/dr_registry.py new "<topic>" --tool <chatgpt|gemini|grok>` → prints `DRYY-MM-DD-MACHINE-NN` (machine code auto-detected — per-machine sequences, no sync collisions) and registers it in `_DR-Registry.md`. Put the ID as the FIRST line of the emitted prompt (`# DR26-07-03-ZB-01 — <topic>`) so the external chat inherits it as its title and exports match the registry. Counter unsure → `--gap` (+10). When the report comes back: `dr_registry.py update <ID> --status collected --file "<path>"` — OR do nothing: the nightly `dr_collect.py` will find the DR-ID in the imported chats/Downloads and flip the status itself (the ownership loop closes automatically; a manual update is only needed if you want the report RIGHT NOW). Canon: the house rule `reglament-numeratsiya-dr-i-reestr`. You do NOT run the deep research yourself. **Hybrid mode:** you MAY do a light in-session web pass (WebSearch/WebFetch) to sharpen the prompt and catch the obvious — but the deep, exhaustive DR is done in an EXTERNAL tool (ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity Deep Research). Emit the prompt for the operator to copy:
- Read the canonical template: `$OBSIDIAN_VAULT/08-Templates/deep-research-prompt-template.md` and emit it **filling `{topic}`**, prepending a `CONTEXT:` block with the recall findings + open questions from Step 2 (so the external DR doesn't redo what we know).
- ⭐ **Always append the `§1 UNIVERSAL ADD-ON` from `08-Templates\dr-platform-playbook.md`** (mandatory citations w/ URLs, confidence tiers, epistemic neutrality, decision-oriented ending). If the operator names the target vendor, or you know it, also append that vendor's block (§2 Grok / §3 Gemini / §4 ChatGPT) so the platform does DR better. Playbook = tuning layer over the universal template.
- Present it as one clean, clearly-marked copy-paste block. ⭐ **Standing mandate (operator, 2026-07-14): don't wait for him to carry the prompt anywhere — fan it out YOURSELF right away via `/dr-fanout` (ChatGPT+Gemini+Grok), any number of DRs, without asking** (we don't ration quotas; degradation is soft; duplicates are caught by Step 3-pre). The copy-paste block stays in the chat as a fallback in case he wants to run it himself.
- ⭐ **Two things into the chat, always (operator, 2026-07-17):** ① the full prompt text in a ```text``` block (paste-ready) + ② **a link to the actual research chat, the moment it exists**, without waiting for the report: `🔗 <vendor>: <url>` for every fan-out chat that started. The link = the private URL (`chatgpt.com/c/…` · `gemini.google.com/app/…` · `grok.com/chat/…`); a public share link is ⛔ by default (that is publishing outward). Couldn't capture the URL → say so honestly with the reason. Broader than DR: if you couldn't pull something out of the browser, give the operator the address to pull it from and he will. Canon: `reglament-vneshniy-resech-vsegda-promt-i-ssylka-v-chat`, memory [[dr-prompt-paste-in-chat]].
**Step 4 — SYNTHESIS + DECISION MEMO** (after the DR results come back). Merge memory + DR into a **Decision Memo**:
`the problem · what we already know · DR findings · options · risks · recommendation`.
Only AFTER the Decision Memo do we start implementation.
⭐ **Close the DR in the same pass (operator's "+", 2026-07-28):** the Decision Memo cites a DR-ID → in THAT SAME pass run `dr_registry.py update <ID> --status applied --note "<what closed it>"` (not adopting it → `--status parked --note "<why>"`). A memo that leaves the registry open = a half-built bridge. When ordering a DR in Step 3, name its consumer: `new --for "<the decision this report feeds>"` — with no consumer the report auto-parks after 30 days. Canon: the house rule `reglament-numeratsiya-dr-i-reestr` §amendment 2026-07-28, memory [[dr-finish-applied-or-parked]].
## Notes
- If a `/schedule`-style recurring research cadence emerges for a topic, evaluate per `evaluate-recurring-into-routine`.
- The DR prompt template is the single source — if it changes, edit the vault template file, not a copy.
- This skill is SEARCH+STRUCTURE; the deep-research harness skill (`deep-research`) is the in-session web variant the operator can opt into, but his default flow is the external hand-off above.
---
<!-- CONTACT-FOOTER -->
## About & contact
Built and battle-tested at **Palo Alto AI Research Lab** — a fleet of Claude Code machines
running 24/7 as a second brain and synthetic cofounder. Every skill here survived real
production use before publication.
- 📦 All 101 skills: https://github.com/tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit
- 👤 Author: **Anton Dziatkovskii** — Telegram [@tonydzi](https://t.me/tonydzi) · WhatsApp [+1 341 222 9178](https://wa.me/13412229178) · X [@Tony_Stef_](https://x.com/Tony_Stef_)
- 🧪 **Engineers: want to test-drive this setup?** Message me — I hand out free starter seeds to engineers who test and report back. Custom skill requests welcome.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!