Skip to content
Back to skills

Planf3

ASecurity

Use when explicitly asked for $planf3 to create, update, or build a minimal Markdown implementation plan from SOLUTION.md or a concrete approved task. Do not use for solution design or speculative architecture.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 22, 2026
ai-agentsgoapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 7 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 28, 2026

npx -y skills add tony-adamson/groundwork --skill planf3 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Planf3?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Planf3
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tony-adamson-planf3/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tony-adamson-planf3)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: planf3
description: "Use when explicitly asked for $planf3 to create, update, or build a minimal Markdown implementation plan from SOLUTION.md or a concrete approved task. Do not use for solution design or speculative architecture."
---

# PlanF3 → minimal implementation plan

PlanF3 works in two modes:

1. **Create Plan** — create `specs/<descriptive-name>-implementation-plan.md`.
2. **Build Plan** — execute an already-approved plan with the `READY_FOR_BUILD` status.

The plan is always Markdown-first. Do not create presentation or visual artifacts. If a diagram is needed — use short text, or Mermaid only when it genuinely helps.

## Primary goal

PlanF3 does not search for "the best architecture". It compiles the approved `SOLUTION.md` into the **smallest executable plan** that implements the requirements, preserves the contracts, and has reproducible checks.

If `SOLUTION.md` exists, it outranks the plan. Do not reinvent the architecture.

## Output file

Defaults:

- `PLAN_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY`: `specs/`
- `PLAN_FILE`: `specs/<descriptive-kebab-name>-implementation-plan.md`

The plan is two-block:

1. **Block 1. For the human** — a short readable summary.
2. **Block 2. For the agent** — a detailed execution contract.

## Statuses

- `DRAFT`
- `BLOCKED_FOR_SOLUTION_AMENDMENT`
- `BLOCKED_BY_SCOPE_OVERDESIGN`
- `READY_FOR_BUILD`
- `BUILD_IN_PROGRESS`
- `BUILD_COMPLETE`
- `BUILD_FAILED`

## Minimal Diff Compiler Mode

When `SOLUTION.md` exists:

- do not improve the architecture;
- do not add future-proofing;
- do not add a dependency/subsystem/state/abstraction outside `SOLUTION.md`;
- do not expand the scope;
- do not turn a local feature into a platform;
- do not add more docs/tests than needed to prove the behavior;
- if the plan needs a new architectural decision — `BLOCKED_FOR_SOLUTION_AMENDMENT`.

## Modes

If the request contains a path to an existing plan and asks to implement it — read [build-plan.md](workflows/build-plan.md).

If the request asks to create a plan from `SOLUTION.md` or a task — read [create-plan.md](workflows/create-plan.md).

If the request asks to update a plan — read [update-plan.md](workflows/update-plan.md).

If the request asks to update references between plans — read [update-references.md](workflows/update-references.md).

Before `READY_FOR_BUILD`, always run [plan-readiness-gate.md](workflows/plan-readiness-gate.md).

## Mandatory gates before READY_FOR_BUILD

- correctness gate PASS;
- executable validation gate PASS;
- minimality gate PASS;
- no architecture decision deferred to the builder;
- no speculative architecture beyond `SOLUTION.md`;
- no material requirement existing only in prose;
- no validation based only on static text when behavior can be checked.

## Build Plan

During implementation:

- execute the phases sequentially;
- make the minimal diff;
- use subagents adaptively;
- after non-trivial phases, run a fresh read-only verifier;
- fix only confirmed blocking findings;
- stop on a new design decision, scope overdesign, or an unsafe action.

## Harness adaptation

On Grok, Plan Challenger, Lean Challenger, and every phase verifier are `spawn_subagent` calls. Do not pass `model` unless the user named one of `grok-4.5`, `grok-4.6`, `grok-4.7`, `grok-4.7-build-fast`. A role that was not spawned must not be reported as run.

If the harness does not provide an isolated-subagent tool (for example, Pi) — perform the implementer/verifier/challenger roles inline as separate passes: the verifier pass outputs only findings, and the coordinator responds. Do not simulate spawning subagents and do not claim they were launched.

## Language

Write plans and reports in the user's language — the language of the user's request and conversation, **not** the language of these instructions. If the request is in Russian, the plan is in Russian. Do not translate file names, commands, APIs, symbols, statuses, or code identifiers.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml262 B
  • workflows/build-plan.md4 KB
  • workflows/create-plan.md4.5 KB
  • workflows/plan-readiness-gate.md2.2 KB
  • workflows/update-plan.md725 B
  • workflows/update-references.md410 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.