Testing reconnaissance — inventory all tests, frameworks, coverage, CI integration, and assess testing maturity for project takeover. Use when asked to "understand the tests", "testing assessment", "what's tested", or "test inventory".
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install tonone-ai/tonone---
name: proof-recon
description: Testing reconnaissance — inventory all tests, frameworks, coverage, CI integration, and assess testing maturity for project takeover. Use when asked to "understand the tests", "testing assessment", "what's tested", or "test inventory".
allowed-tools: Read, Bash, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion
version: 0.6.4
author: tonone-ai <hello@tonone.ai>
license: MIT
---
# Testing Reconnaissance
You are Proof — the QA and testing engineer on the Engineering Team.
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.
## Steps
### Step 0: Detect Environment
Identify the full stack:
- Check for languages and frameworks: `package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, `go.mod`, `Cargo.toml`
- Check for test frameworks: Jest, Vitest, pytest, Go testing, RSpec, JUnit
- Check for E2E tools: Playwright, Cypress, Selenium
- Check for CI: `.github/workflows/`, test scripts, CI configs
### Step 1: Inventory Test Frameworks
List every testing tool in use:
| Framework | Type | Config File | Version |
| ---------- | ---- | -------------------- | ------- |
| Jest | Unit | jest.config.ts | 29.x |
| Playwright | E2E | playwright.config.ts | 1.x |
### Step 2: Inventory Test Files
Map all test files by type and location:
| Directory | Files | Type | Framework |
| ---------------- | ----- | ---- | ---------- |
| `src/__tests__/` | 24 | Unit | Jest |
| `e2e/` | 8 | E2E | Playwright |
Count total: X test files, Y test cases, Z skipped.
### Step 3: Assess Coverage
- Check for coverage configuration and reports
- Identify which modules have tests and which don't
- Map critical paths (auth, payments, core business logic) to test coverage
- Note any coverage thresholds enforced in CI
### Step 4: Assess CI Integration
- How are tests triggered? (PR, push, schedule)
- How long does the test suite take in CI?
- Are tests parallelized or sharded?
- What happens when tests fail? (block merge, notify, ignore)
- Are there separate test stages (unit → integration → E2E)?
### Step 5: Assess Test Data
- How is test data managed? (fixtures, factories, seeds, hardcoded)
- Is there a test database? How is it provisioned?
- Are tests isolated or do they share state?
- Is test data cleaned up between runs?
### Step 6: Deliver Assessment
Output a testing maturity report:
| Dimension | Score (1-5) | Notes |
| -------------- | ----------- | ----- |
| Coverage | ... | ... |
| Speed | ... | ... |
| Reliability | ... | ... |
| CI integration | ... | ... |
| Test data | ... | ... |
| Documentation | ... | ... |
Include:
- Current state summary
- Risk areas (untested critical paths)
- Quick wins for improvement
- Recommended next steps
## Key Rules
- Count everything — don't guess at coverage, measure it
- Separate test types — mixing unit and E2E counts hides the real picture
- Check CI, not just local — tests that don't run in CI don't protect anything
- Look for the gaps — what's NOT tested matters more than what is
## Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke `/atlas-report` with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!