Review a task decomposition for granularity, completeness, dependency clarity, and estimability.
Scanned 10/6/2026
npx -y skills add tomzx/agents --skill review-tasks-decomposition --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Review Tasks Decomposition?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tomzx-review-tasks-decomposition)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: review-tasks-decomposition
description: Review a task decomposition for granularity, completeness, dependency clarity, and estimability.
---
# Review Tasks Decomposition
Audits a task decomposition and reports findings across five categories: granularity, completeness, dependencies, acceptance criteria, and estimability.
## Prerequisites
- Apply the shared SDLC conventions in `skills/sdlc/references/shared.md`.
- If no argument is provided, locate the feature directory under `.sdlc/features/` whose frontmatter `issue` field references `$ISSUE_NUMBER`.
- `.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/tasks/` directory containing individual task files, or task files provided in context
- `.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/plan.md` (optional, improves completeness check)
## Steps
1. Read all `.md` files in `.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/tasks/`.
2. Evaluate each task against the checklist below.
3. Report findings by category. Omit categories with no findings.
4. Write the findings to `.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/review-tasks.md` with frontmatter `artifact: tasks`, `verdict` (`approved` if there are no blocking findings, `changes-requested` if the author must address findings, `rejected` for a fundamental flaw), and `reviewed_at: <ISO date>`, and the findings as the body, per `skills/sdlc/references/shared.md`. Record any unresolved open questions in the findings body. For any question that carries meaningful risk to the implementation, also invoke `/create-assumption` to record it formally. When the verdict is `approved`, set each task file's frontmatter `status` to `pending` (the task-lifecycle "ready to start" state, which `create-implementation` relies on).
5. Populate the Task Progress table in `.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/progress.md` with all tasks, their sizes, and `pending` status. Set `re_entry_point: "tests"` and `current_phase: "tasks-complete"` in the frontmatter.
## Review Checklist
### Granularity
- Are any tasks too large to complete in one session (> 2 days)?
- Are any tasks too small and should be merged with adjacent work?
- Is each task independently deliverable?
### Completeness
- Do the tasks collectively cover all plan phases and deliverables?
- Are setup, teardown, and operational tasks included (migrations, feature flags, monitoring)?
- Are documentation and testing tasks explicitly listed?
### Dependencies
- Are all dependencies explicitly declared?
- Are there implicit dependencies (shared state, ordering assumptions) not captured?
- Is the critical path identified?
- Are there dependency cycles?
### Acceptance Criteria
- Does every task have verifiable acceptance criteria?
- Are the criteria specific and measurable?
- Do criteria distinguish "done" from "done and tested"?
### Estimability
- Is a size or effort estimate given for each task?
- Are estimates consistent with the described scope?
- Are there tasks with high uncertainty that need a spike first?
## Output Format
```markdown
## Granularity
<Findings or "No issues found.">
## Completeness
<Findings or "No issues found.">
## Dependencies
<Findings or "No issues found.">
## Acceptance Criteria
<Findings or "No issues found.">
## Estimability
<Findings or "No issues found.">
```
## Outcome
If `$OUTCOME_YAML` is set, emit your verdict there per `skills/sdlc/references/shared.md`:
| Verdict | When |
|---|---|
| `approved` | No blocking findings; the subject passes review |
| `changes-requested` | Findings the author must address before it passes |
| `rejected` | Fundamental flaw requiring rework or stopping |
In the same emission, list the findings file under `artifacts:` (`.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/review-tasks.md`).
## Example Usage
**Scenario 1: Missing test tasks**
Every feature task has a corresponding code task, but no testing tasks appear anywhere in the decomposition.
Report under Completeness.
**Scenario 2: Dependency cycle**
T-05 depends on T-08, and T-08 depends on T-05.
Report under Dependencies.
**Scenario 3: XL task left unbroken**
T-03 "Implement the payment module" is marked `[L]` but its description spans 6 distinct features.
Report under Granularity.
## Next Step
Once the findings verdict is `approved`, continue with `/create-tests`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!