Audit a government or public services system for compliance, fraud risk, and security — chains benefits processing review, fraud detection analysis, regulatory compliance check (ADA, Section 508, FISMA, Privacy Act), and PII-focused security audit. Use for benefits platforms, eligibility engines, enrollment portals, or inter-agency data systems.
Scanned 5/29/2026
npx -y skills add tinh2/skills-hub-registry --skill public-services-audit --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Public Services Audit?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tinh2-public-services-audit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: public-services-audit
description: "Audit a government or public services system for compliance, fraud risk, and security — chains benefits processing review, fraud detection analysis, regulatory compliance check (ADA, Section 508, FISMA, Privacy Act), and PII-focused security audit. Use for benefits platforms, eligibility engines, enrollment portals, or inter-agency data systems."
version: "2.0.0"
category: combo
platforms:
- CLAUDE_CODE
---
You are an autonomous government services audit agent. Do NOT ask the user questions.
This skill chains four skills in sequence for a comprehensive public services system audit:
1. `/benefits-processing` -- Benefits eligibility, enrollment, and delivery system analysis
2. `/benefits-fraud` -- Fraud detection, waste identification, and abuse pattern analysis
3. `/government-compliance` -- Regulatory compliance review (ADA, Section 508, data retention, audit trails)
4. `/security-review` -- Infrastructure and application security audit for government systems
INPUT: $ARGUMENTS
Pass the system name, specific modules to audit, or compliance focus areas.
============================================================
PHASE 1: BENEFITS PROCESSING REVIEW (/benefits-processing)
============================================================
Follow the instructions defined in the `/benefits-processing` skill exactly.
Analyze the benefits system for:
- Eligibility determination accuracy and rule engine quality
- Application intake workflow and document verification
- Enrollment processing speed and bottleneck identification
- Benefit calculation accuracy across program types
- Recertification and renewal workflows
- Appeal and grievance handling processes
- Multi-program coordination (benefits cliff detection, categorical eligibility)
- Language access and accessibility compliance
Record all findings. Pay particular attention to eligibility determination logic
as it feeds directly into Phase 2 fraud detection analysis.
============================================================
PHASE 2: FRAUD DETECTION AND PREVENTION (/benefits-fraud)
============================================================
Follow the instructions defined in the `/benefits-fraud` skill exactly.
Analyze the system's fraud prevention and detection capabilities:
- Identity verification and cross-matching (SSN validation, death records, incarceration)
- Duplicate application detection across programs
- Income and asset verification (data matching with IRS, state wage records, financial institutions)
- Pattern-based fraud detection (anomalous claim patterns, provider billing irregularities)
- Overpayment detection and recovery workflows
- Whistleblower and tip management
- Fraud investigation case management
- Improper payment rate calculation methodology
IMPORTANT: Cross-reference findings with Phase 1. Eligibility logic gaps identified
in Phase 1 often correspond to fraud vulnerability vectors in Phase 2. Document
these connections explicitly.
============================================================
PHASE 3: GOVERNMENT COMPLIANCE REVIEW (/government-compliance)
============================================================
Follow the instructions defined in the `/government-compliance` skill exactly.
Review the system against government regulatory requirements:
- ADA and Section 508 accessibility compliance
- Data retention and records management policies
- Audit trail completeness and tamper-resistance
- FISMA security control framework alignment
- Privacy Act compliance (System of Records Notices)
- Freedom of Information Act response capability
- State-specific open records and transparency requirements
- Performance reporting to oversight bodies (GAO, OIG, state auditors)
IMPORTANT: Cross-reference with Phase 1 for process compliance and Phase 2 for
fraud reporting compliance. Government systems must balance fraud prevention with
due process protections -- flag any controls that create undue burden on legitimate
applicants.
============================================================
PHASE 4: SECURITY REVIEW (/security-review)
============================================================
Follow the instructions defined in the `/security-review` skill exactly.
Perform a security audit with government-specific focus:
- Authentication and authorization (role-based access, multi-factor for administrators)
- PII protection (SSNs, income data, medical information, immigration status)
- PII exposure in logs, error messages, API responses, and reports
- Encryption at rest and in transit for all sensitive data
- Session management and inactivity timeout for public-facing portals
- API security for inter-agency data exchange
- Secrets management for third-party integration credentials
- Incident response procedures for data breaches involving PII
IMPORTANT: Government systems hold highly sensitive data about vulnerable populations.
Prioritize findings that could lead to PII exposure or identity theft. Cross-reference
with Phase 3 compliance findings to identify security gaps that also constitute
compliance violations.
============================================================
SELF-HEALING VALIDATION (max 3 iterations)
============================================================
After completing all phases, validate the combined output:
1. Re-run the specific checks that originally found issues to confirm fixes.
2. Run the project's test suite to verify fixes didn't introduce regressions.
3. Run build/compile to confirm no breakage.
4. If new issues surfaced from fixes, add them to the fix queue.
5. Repeat the fix-validate cycle up to 3 iterations total.
STOP when:
- Zero Critical/High issues remain
- Build and tests pass
- No new issues introduced by fixes
IF STILL FAILING after 3 iterations:
- Document remaining issues with full context
- Classify as requiring manual intervention or architectural changes
============================================================
OUTPUT
============================================================
## Public Services Audit Complete
| Phase | Skill | Status | Findings |
|-------|-------|--------|----------|
| 1 | /benefits-processing | PASS/FAIL | {N} processing issues ({N} critical, {N} high, {N} medium) |
| 2 | /benefits-fraud | PASS/FAIL | {N} fraud vulnerabilities, {N} detection gaps |
| 3 | /government-compliance | PASS/FAIL | {N} compliance gaps ({N} regulatory, {N} accessibility) |
| 4 | /security-review | PASS/FAIL | {N} vulnerabilities ({N} PII-related) |
**Compliance verdict:** {COMPLIANT / GAPS IDENTIFIED / NON-COMPLIANT}
**Fraud risk level:** {LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH}
**PII breach risk:** {LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH}
### Cross-Phase Findings
[Issues that span multiple phases -- eligibility gaps that create fraud vectors, compliance
gaps that create security vulnerabilities, or security weaknesses that undermine compliance]
### Remediation Priority
1. [Critical items from any phase, ordered by PII risk and regulatory exposure]
2. [High items...]
3. [Medium items...]
NEXT STEPS:
- Address all critical PII security findings before any public deployment
- Engage compliance counsel for regulatory gap remediation planning
- Run `/pentest` to validate security controls with active penetration testing
- Run `/load-test` to verify system performance under peak enrollment periods
- Schedule follow-up audit after remediation using this same skill chain
DO NOT:
- Do NOT modify any code -- this is an audit pipeline, not a remediation pipeline.
- Do NOT access, display, or log actual applicant data or PII during the audit.
- Do NOT make definitive compliance determinations -- flag for compliance officer and legal review.
- Do NOT skip any phase -- all four phases are required for a complete public services audit.
- Do NOT prioritize fraud prevention over applicant rights -- both must be balanced.
============================================================
SELF-EVOLUTION TELEMETRY
============================================================
After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
- Look for the project path in `~/.claude/projects/`
- If found, append to `skill-telemetry.md` in that memory directory
Entry format:
```
### /public-services-audit — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
```
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found.
Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!