Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Launch Readiness

ASecurity

Run a full pre-launch quality gate before shipping — chains product review, growth audit, UX audit, security scan, and deployment preflight into a go/no-go launch decision. Stops on critical blockers. Use before v1 launch, beta release, major version rollout, or feature launch.

15 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 5/29/2026
ai-agentsgogitsecurity

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 5/29/2026

$npx -y skills add tinh2/skills-hub-registry --skill launch-readiness --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Launch Readiness?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Launch Readiness
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tinh2-launch-readiness/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tinh2-launch-readiness)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: launch-readiness
description: "Run a full pre-launch quality gate before shipping — chains product review, growth audit, UX audit, security scan, and deployment preflight into a go/no-go launch decision. Stops on critical blockers. Use before v1 launch, beta release, major version rollout, or feature launch."
version: "2.0.0"
category: combo
platforms:
  - CLAUDE_CODE
---

You are an autonomous launch readiness agent. Do NOT ask the user questions.
Run the full pre-launch pipeline below. If any phase finds CRITICAL issues,
STOP immediately and report before proceeding -- do not let critical problems
cascade through later phases unaddressed.

TARGET:
$ARGUMENTS

If arguments are provided, use them as context for the launch scope (e.g.,
"v2.0 launch", "beta release", specific feature area). If no arguments,
evaluate full product launch readiness.

============================================================
PHASE 1: PRODUCT REVIEW (/cpo-review)
============================================================

Follow the instructions defined in the `/cpo-review` skill exactly.

Evaluate the product from a Chief Product Officer perspective:
- Feature completeness against stated goals
- User journey coherence
- Value proposition clarity
- Product-market alignment

Record the CPO verdict and all findings.

**CRITICAL GATE:** If the CPO review identifies any CRITICAL product gaps
(e.g., core user flow is broken, value proposition is unclear, critical
feature is missing), STOP and report. Do NOT proceed to later phases --
launching with a broken product wastes all downstream effort.

============================================================
PHASE 2: GROWTH AUDIT (/growth-audit)
============================================================

Follow the instructions defined in the `/growth-audit` skill exactly.

Evaluate growth readiness:
- Acquisition channels and landing page effectiveness
- Activation flow (signup to aha moment)
- Retention hooks and engagement loops
- Referral and viral mechanics
- Revenue/monetization infrastructure

Record the growth readiness score and all findings.

**CRITICAL GATE:** If growth audit finds CRITICAL issues (e.g., no way to
acquire users, activation flow is broken, zero retention infrastructure),
STOP and report.

============================================================
PHASE 3: UX AUDIT (/ux)
============================================================

Follow the instructions defined in the `/ux` skill exactly, in UX Audit mode.

Evaluate every user-facing screen against:
- Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics
- WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards
- Interaction and motion design principles
- Design system consistency

Fix all issues found and commit the fixes.
Record the UX verdict: UX READY, UX NEEDS WORK, or UX POOR.

**CRITICAL GATE:** If UX verdict is UX POOR, STOP and report.

============================================================
PHASE 4: SECURITY SCAN (/secure)
============================================================

Follow the instructions defined in the `/secure` skill exactly.

Run the full security audit:
- Authentication and authorization
- Input validation and sanitization
- Data exposure and leakage
- Dependency vulnerabilities
- Infrastructure security

Fix all issues found and commit the fixes.

**CRITICAL GATE:** If any CRITICAL security vulnerabilities are found that
could not be fixed, STOP and report. Do NOT launch with known critical
security issues.

============================================================
PHASE 5: DEPLOYMENT PREFLIGHT (/preflight)
============================================================

Follow the instructions defined in the `/preflight` skill exactly.

Run pre-deploy verification:
- Git status (clean working tree, all pushed)
- Build verification (compiles without errors)
- Test suite (all passing)
- Migration status
- Dependency lock files committed
- Convention compliance

Record the preflight verdict: READY TO DEPLOY or NOT READY.


============================================================
SELF-HEALING VALIDATION (max 3 iterations)
============================================================

After completing all phases, validate the combined output:

1. Re-run the specific checks that originally found issues to confirm fixes.
2. Run the project's test suite to verify fixes didn't introduce regressions.
3. Run build/compile to confirm no breakage.
4. If new issues surfaced from fixes, add them to the fix queue.
5. Repeat the fix-validate cycle up to 3 iterations total.

STOP when:
- Zero Critical/High issues remain
- Build and tests pass
- No new issues introduced by fixes

IF STILL FAILING after 3 iterations:
- Document remaining issues with full context
- Classify as requiring manual intervention or architectural changes

============================================================
OUTPUT
============================================================

## Launch Readiness Report

### Pipeline Results

| Phase | Skill | Status | Critical | High | Medium | Verdict |
|-------|-------|--------|----------|------|--------|---------|
| 1 | /cpo-review | {PASS/FAIL} | {N} | {N} | {N} | {verdict} |
| 2 | /growth-audit | {PASS/FAIL} | {N} | {N} | {N} | {verdict} |
| 3 | /ux | {PASS/FAIL} | {N} | {N} | {N} | {UX verdict} |
| 4 | /secure | {PASS/FAIL} | {N} | {N} | {N} | {verdict} |
| 5 | /preflight | {PASS/FAIL} | {N} | {N} | {N} | {READY/NOT READY} |

### Launch Decision

**LAUNCH VERDICT: {GO / NO-GO / CONDITIONAL GO}**

- **GO**: All phases passed. No critical issues. Product is launch-ready.
- **CONDITIONAL GO**: No critical issues, but high-severity items should be
  addressed soon after launch. List the conditions.
- **NO-GO**: Critical issues remain. List every blocker that must be resolved.

### Stopped Early (if applicable)

Phase {N} ({skill name}) found CRITICAL issues. Pipeline halted.

Blockers that must be resolved before re-running:
1. {blocker description} -- {file reference}
2. ...

### Issues Fixed During Pipeline

| Phase | Fix | Files Changed |
|-------|-----|---------------|
| 3 | {UX fix description} | {files} |
| 4 | {security fix description} | {files} |

### Remaining Non-Blocking Issues

| # | Issue | Phase | Severity | Recommendation |
|---|-------|-------|----------|----------------|
| 1 | {description} | {phase} | {HIGH/MEDIUM} | {action} |

============================================================

============================================================
SELF-EVOLUTION TELEMETRY
============================================================

After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.

Check if a project memory directory exists:
- Look for the project path in `~/.claude/projects/`
- If found, append to `skill-telemetry.md` in that memory directory

Entry format:
```
### /launch-readiness — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
```

Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found.
Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.

STRICT RULES
============================================================

- Each phase MUST run the referenced skill's full instructions.
- CRITICAL gates are mandatory. If a gate fails, STOP and report.
- Phases run sequentially -- each depends on the previous passing.
- Fixes from Phase 3 (UX) and Phase 4 (Security) must be committed.
- Phase 5 (Preflight) validates the final state including all fixes.
- All rules from each referenced skill apply within their respective phases.
- If a referenced skill does not exist yet, skip that phase with a
  "SKIPPED -- skill not available" status and continue to the next phase.

NEXT STEPS:

After GO:
- "Deploy with confidence. All quality gates passed."
- "Run `/full-deploy` to execute the deployment pipeline."

After CONDITIONAL GO:
- "Launch, but schedule `/iterate` to address the high-severity items within 1 week."
- "Run `/customer-success-audit` to ensure post-launch support infrastructure is ready."

After NO-GO:
- "Fix the blockers listed above, then re-run `/launch-readiness`."
- "Run `/iterate` to address the critical issues."
- "Run `/polish` for a thorough quality pass before retrying."

Attribution

tinh2tinh2
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from tinh2 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698621 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →