Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Full Test

ASecurity

Complete testing pipeline — full test suite, test everything, automated and manual tests.

15 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 5/29/2026
ai-agentsgosqltestingapidatabasefrontendbackendsecurityperformance

Works with

cliapi

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 5/29/2026

$npx -y skills add tinh2/skills-hub-registry --skill full-test --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Full Test?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Full Test
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tinh2-full-test/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tinh2-full-test)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: full-test
description: "Complete testing pipeline — full test suite, test everything, automated and manual tests."
version: "2.0.0"
category: test
instructions: |
  You are an autonomous testing agent. Do NOT ask the user questions.
  Run the full pipeline below without pausing between phases.

  TARGET:
  $ARGUMENTS

  If arguments are provided, focus testing on those features/flows.
  If no arguments are provided, test the entire application.

  ============================================================
  PHASE 1: AUTOMATED E2E TESTS  (/e2e)
  ============================================================

  Follow the instructions defined in the `/e2e` skill exactly.
  Run all 9 phases: Stack Discovery > Environment Setup > Backend API Tests >
  Frontend UI Tests > Integration Tests > Test Execution > Self-Healing Fix Loop >
  Full Regression > Coverage Report.

  Record the final test results and coverage report. Note which areas have
  strong automated coverage and which areas are harder to test automatically
  (complex user flows, visual regressions, edge cases requiring human judgment).

  Do NOT stop here. Continue immediately to Phase 2.

  ============================================================
  PHASE 2: MANUAL TEST PLAN  (/manual-test-plan)
  ============================================================

  Follow the instructions defined in the `/manual-test-plan` skill exactly.

  IMPORTANT: When generating the manual test plan, factor in the automated
  test coverage from Phase 1:

  - Do NOT duplicate scenarios that are already well-covered by automated tests.
  - FOCUS manual test scenarios on:
    1. Areas where automated tests found bugs (verify fixes manually)
    2. Flows that are hard to automate (multi-step UX, visual layout, real device behavior)
    3. Edge cases the automated suite couldn't cover (network conditions, permissions, etc.)
    4. Exploratory testing suggestions for areas with low automated coverage
  - Reference the automated test results: "Automated tests cover X; manually verify Y."

  Do NOT stop here. Continue immediately to Phase 3.

  ============================================================
  PHASE 3 (OPTIONAL): PERFORMANCE & LOAD TESTING
  ============================================================

  Run this phase if the project has API endpoints, database queries, or
  user-facing pages that could degrade under load. Skip if the project is
  a CLI tool, library, or has no server component.

  Steps:
  1. Identify critical endpoints and database-heavy operations from Phase 1.
  2. Write load test scenarios using the project's existing tooling (k6, Artillery,
     Locust, ab, autocannon, or simple scripted loops if no tool is installed).
  3. Run baseline benchmarks: measure p50, p95, p99 latency and throughput for
     each critical endpoint under normal load (10 concurrent users).
  4. Run stress tests: ramp to 50, then 100 concurrent users. Record where
     latency degrades or errors spike.
  5. Profile slow queries or endpoints. Check for N+1 queries, missing indexes,
     unbounded result sets, and missing pagination.
  6. Record results: response times, throughput limits, and bottleneck locations.

  Do NOT stop here. Continue immediately to Phase 4.

  ============================================================
  PHASE 4 (OPTIONAL): SECURITY TESTING (OWASP)
  ============================================================

  Run this phase if the project has a web interface, API endpoints, or
  handles user input/authentication. Skip if the project is a pure library
  with no I/O surface.

  Check each applicable OWASP Top 10 category:
  1. **Injection** — Test for SQL injection, NoSQL injection, command injection,
     and template injection on all user inputs and query parameters.
  2. **Broken Authentication** — Verify session management, password policies,
     token expiration, and brute-force protections.
  3. **Sensitive Data Exposure** — Check for secrets in source, unencrypted
     PII, missing HTTPS enforcement, overly verbose error messages.
  4. **Broken Access Control** — Test for IDOR, privilege escalation, missing
     authorization checks on endpoints, direct object references.
  5. **Security Misconfiguration** — Check default credentials, open CORS,
     debug mode in production configs, unnecessary open ports.
  6. **XSS** — Test for reflected, stored, and DOM-based XSS on all inputs
     that render in HTML or client-side templates.
  7. **CSRF** — Verify anti-CSRF tokens on state-changing requests.
  8. **Dependency Vulnerabilities** — Run `npm audit`, `pip audit`, `cargo audit`,
     or equivalent. Flag critical and high severity issues.
  9. **Rate Limiting** — Verify rate limits exist on auth endpoints, API routes,
     and form submissions.
  10. **Logging & Monitoring** — Check that auth failures, access denials, and
      input validation failures are logged without leaking sensitive data.

  Record all findings with severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low / Info).

  ============================================================
  OUTPUT
  ============================================================

  When all phases are complete, print a summary:

  ---
  ## Full Test Pass Complete


  PARALLEL EXECUTION: Use the Agent tool to run both phases concurrently.
  - Agent A (E2E Tests): "Run /e2e skill instructions on this project. Auto-detect the stack, generate and run exhaustive integration tests. Apply self-healing for failures. Return: test results, coverage summary, issues found."
  - Agent B (Manual Test Plan): "Run /manual-test-plan skill instructions on this project. Generate a comprehensive manual test plan from the codebase and any specs. Return: the complete test plan document."
  - Wait for both agents to complete.
  - Cross-reference: Remove manual test steps that are fully covered by passing automated tests from Agent A.
  - Merge into final output: automated test results + complementary manual test plan.


  **Automated E2E Results:**
  - Tests run: [N]
  - Passed: [N] | Failed: [N] | Fixed: [N]
  - Quality verdict: [ROCK SOLID / STABLE / FRAGILE / BROKEN]

  **Manual Test Plan:**
  - Manual scenarios generated: [N]
  - Focus areas: [list areas needing manual verification]

  **Performance & Load Testing:** [SKIPPED or results]
  - Baseline p95 latency: [Xms]
  - Stress test limit: [N concurrent users before degradation]
  - Bottlenecks found: [list or "none"]

  **Security Testing (OWASP):** [SKIPPED or results]
  - Critical: [N] | High: [N] | Medium: [N] | Low: [N]
  - Key findings: [list top issues]

  **Coverage assessment:**
  - Strong automated coverage: [list areas]
  - Needs manual verification: [list areas]
  - Gaps (no coverage): [list areas, if any]

  **Next steps:**
  - Execute the manual test plan before merging
  - Fix any Critical/High security findings before merging
  - Address performance bottlenecks if p95 > 500ms
  - Run `/polish` for UX audit + QA verification + domain analysis
  - Run `/qa` for additional functional verification
  ---

  STRICT RULES:

  - Do NOT skip Phase 1 and only generate a manual test plan.
  - Do NOT duplicate automated test coverage in the manual plan.
  - Phase 2 must reference Phase 1 results to produce a complementary (not redundant) plan.
  - Phases 3 and 4 are optional — skip them only when the criteria above say to skip.
  - All rules from `/e2e` and `/manual-test-plan` apply to their respective phases.
platforms:
  - CLAUDE_CODE
---


============================================================
SELF-EVOLUTION TELEMETRY
============================================================

After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.

Check if a project memory directory exists:
- Look for the project path in `~/.claude/projects/`
- If found, append to `skill-telemetry.md` in that memory directory

Entry format:
```
### /full-test — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
```

Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found.
Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.

Attribution

tinh2tinh2
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from tinh2 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →