Analyze complexity and smells, draft a safe refactor plan, and execute step-by-step with tests. Use when refactoring code or invoking /refactor.
Scanned 9/25/2026
npx -y skills add tibursocampos/agent-dev-toolkit --skill refactor --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Refactor?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tibursocampos-refactor-e24b71a2)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: refactor
description: Analyze complexity and smells, draft a safe refactor plan, and execute step-by-step with tests. Use when refactoring code or invoking /refactor.
---
## STOP - Read before ANY tool call
1. Read `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/rules/guardrails.mdc`
2. Read `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/sdd-artifacts/SESSION.md`; load session-state for `$Cwd`
3. If the relevant gate is not approved: **STOP** - ask user **(pt-BR)** - do **NOT** Write/Shell
4. SDD/develop skills: after **ONE** step/task, **STOP** session - handoff only
5. This skill body is **English**; user-facing prompts may be **(pt-BR)**
### Step -1 - Gate check (report in chat before continuing)
```
Gate check:
[ ] guardrails.mdc read
[ ] SESSION.md read; session-state loaded
[ ] PIPELINE.md read (SDD skills only)
[ ] User confirmed current action (sim)
-> If any unchecked: STOP
```
---
# Skill: refactor
## Trigger
Invoke when the user requests: `/refactor`, `refactor code`, `/refactor`, or when code reviews indicate high complexity.
**Arguments (optional):**
| Input | Meaning |
|-------|---------|
| File path | Target file to analyze and refactor |
| Method name | Target specific routine or component within a file |
## Outcome
Safely refactored code with lower cognitive complexity, improved testability, and adherence to language-specific clean code guidelines, without breaking existing test suites.
## Lazy-load
| When | Path (after `scripts/sync-cursor.ps1`) |
|------|----------------------------------------|
| C# projects | `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/dotnet-guidelines/csharp-patterns.md`, `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/dotnet-guidelines/csharp-formatting.md` |
| Python projects | `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/python-guidelines/principles.md`, `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/python-guidelines/google-style.md` |
| JavaScript / TypeScript | `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/javascript-guidelines/clean-code-js.md`, `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/javascript-guidelines/clean-code-ts.md`, `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/javascript-guidelines/google-ts-style.md` |
| React components | `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/react-guidelines/components-and-state.md`, `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/react-guidelines/hooks-and-effects.md` |
| Angular directives / templates | `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/angular-guidelines/standalone-and-templates.md`, `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/angular-guidelines/style-and-structure.md`, `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/angular-guidelines/signals-and-state.md` |
| Caveman Mode (if active) | `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/caveman/CAVEMAN.md` - **Full cap** |
## Process
### Step -1b - Caveman Mode (Full cap)
1. Read `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/sdd/preferences.json` (create `{ "caveman_mode": false, "caveman_level": "full" }` if missing).
2. If `caveman_mode` is false: continue without compression.
3. If true: load `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/caveman/CAVEMAN.md`; apply **Full** participation cap + prefs `caveman_level` (Lite skills never escalate); show once: `[Caveman] Modo ativo (respostas compactas, level={effective}). Digite caveman off para desativar.`
4. Honor `caveman on|off|status|lite|full|ultra` (and `stop caveman` / `normal mode`) during the session.
5. Auto-Clarity + never-compress gates/drafts/paths per `CAVEMAN.md`.
### -1. Re-check guardrails and session
Confirm `guardrails.mdc` and `SESSION.md` are loaded before continuing.
If missing, ask user (pt-BR):
```text
Antes do refactor, confirme:
- guardrails.mdc lido
- SESSION.md carregado
Posso seguir? (sim / ajustar / cancelar)
```
### 0. Detect Tech Stack and Load Guidelines
* Check the current workspace files (look for `.csproj`, `package.json`, `requirements.txt`, etc.).
* Lazy-load the corresponding language guidelines from `E:/Source/Repos/agent-dev-toolkit/scripts/validation/fixtures/cursor-install-root/skills/_shared/`.
### 1. Code Smells Analysis
* Read the target file. Identify code smells:
* Methods or functions exceeding 30 lines.
* Deep nesting (more than 3 levels of indentation).
* Magic strings or hardcoded parameters.
* Duplicate blocks of code within the file.
* Violation of SOLID principles (e.g., class doing too many things).
* Present a summary of identified smells.
### 2. Workflow Decision & Path Selection
* Present the summary of identified code smells and debt.
* Stop and ask the user to choose the workflow execution path based on the scope:
* **Option A - Direct Developer Skill (`/developer`):** For straightforward local refactoring edits.
* **Option B - Classic SDD (`/sdd-spec` -> `sdd-plan` -> `sdd-develop`):** For complex structural refactorings requiring a formal specification (PRD) and a step-by-step checklist (PLAN) in Portuguese.
* **Option D - Plain Chat Plan:** Establish a simple task list directly in the chat, executing steps one by one without extra file creations.
* **Wait for explicit user choice** before writing code or initializing another workflow.
### 3. Step-by-Step Execution & Validation
* For each accepted refactoring step:
* Apply the minimum diff modification.
* Run compiler checks (e.g. `dotnet build`, `npm run build`, `mypy` or build/typecheck commands).
* Run the unit test suite (e.g. `dotnet test`, `npm test`, `pytest`).
* If validation fails:
* Revert the current step immediately.
* Explain the failure and discuss alternative approaches.
* If validation passes, proceed to the next step.
### 4. Code Formatting
* Once all steps are complete, run the target formatter on the refactored files (e.g. CSharpier, Prettier, Black, Ruff) to align with style rules.
### 5. Handoff
* Ask the user if they want to review the final diff and handoff to the commit skill:
```
/commit
```
## Must not
* Perform functional changes (adding features, fixing bugs) at the same time as refactoring.
* Commit or push changes automatically without explicit user confirmation.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!