Manages skill-creator integration with GSD workflows including skill loading, session observation, bounded learning guardrails, and pattern detection. Use this skill whenever: executing any GSD phase (to ensure relevant skills are loaded first), starting or resuming a work session (to check for pending suggestions), the user asks about skills, patterns, or skill-creator status, performing code changes that might represent repeating patterns, the user corrects Claude's output (highest-signal o...
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator --skill skill-integration --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Skill Integration?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tibsfox-skill-integration-gsd-skill-creator)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: skill-integration
description: >
Manages skill-creator integration with GSD workflows including skill
loading, session observation, bounded learning guardrails, and pattern
detection. Use this skill whenever: executing any GSD phase (to ensure
relevant skills are loaded first), starting or resuming a work session
(to check for pending suggestions), the user asks about skills, patterns,
or skill-creator status, performing code changes that might represent
repeating patterns, the user corrects Claude's output (highest-signal
observation), or when skill refinement, creation, or suggestion review
is discussed. Critical for maintaining the adaptive learning layer.
user-invocable: true
version: 1.0.0
format: 2025-10-02
triggers:
- "Manages skill-creator integration with GSD workflows including skill loading, session observation, bounded learning guardrails, and pattern detection"
updated: 2026-04-25
status: ACTIVE
---
# Skill-Creator Integration
Manages skill loading, observation, and bounded learning for the GSD ecosystem. Ensures learned knowledge persists across sessions and subagent contexts.
## Skill Loading Before GSD Phases
Before executing any GSD phase, load relevant generated skills:
1. Check `.claude/commands/` for project-level skills
2. Check `~/.claude/commands/` for user-level skills
3. Project-level skills take precedence over user-level on conflict
4. Load only skills relevant to the current phase and task
5. Respect the token budget: 2-5% of context window maximum
**Critical:** When forking subagent contexts for GSD phases (`execute-phase`, `verify-work`), include relevant skills in the subagent's context. Clean context means free of stale conversation history -- not free of learned knowledge. A subagent that can't access learned skills is throwing away everything skill-creator has captured.
For full 6-stage pipeline details, see `references/loading-protocol.md`.
## Token Budget Management
The 6-stage skill loading pipeline (Score, Resolve, ModelFilter, CacheOrder, Budget, Load) manages what gets loaded. When multiple skills compete for budget:
1. Phase-relevant skills get priority (e.g., testing skills during `verify-work`)
2. Recently activated skills rank higher than dormant ones
3. Project-level skills override user-level duplicates
4. If budget is exceeded, queue overflow skills and note what was deferred
## Session Observation Protocol
During all work sessions, maintain awareness of patterns worth capturing:
- Tool sequences that repeat across sessions (e.g., `git log -> read file -> edit -> test -> commit`)
- File patterns consistently touched during specific GSD phases
- Commands run after test failures or verification issues
- Corrections the user makes to agent output -- these are the highest-signal observations
- Phase outcomes: success, failure, partial, and what was different
If `.planning/patterns/` exists, record observations to `sessions.jsonl` in that directory. This data feeds skill-creator's pattern detection pipeline.
For observation taxonomy, signal strength ranking, and JSONL schema, see `references/observation-patterns.md`.
## Bounded Learning Guardrails
**These constraints are NON-NEGOTIABLE:**
- Maximum 20% content change per skill refinement
- Minimum 3 corrections before a refinement is proposed
- 7-day cooldown between refinements of the same skill
- All refinements require user confirmation
- Skill generation never skips permission checks
- Agent composition requires 5+ co-activations over 7+ days
For rationale and enforcement details, see `references/bounded-guardrails.md`.
## Phase Transition Hooks
After completing any GSD phase transition, check for skills that should trigger:
| GSD Event | Check For |
|-----------|-----------|
| `plan-phase` completes | Skills triggered by planning completion, docs regeneration |
| `execute-phase` completes | Skills triggered by execution progress, state updates |
| `verify-work` completes | Skills triggered by verification results, test patterns |
| `complete-milestone` completes | Skills triggered by milestone completion, docs finalization |
| Any `.planning/` file write | Dashboard regeneration if gsd-planning-docs skill is installed |
Run matching skills **after** the phase completes, not during -- avoid adding overhead to the critical path.
## Skill Suggestions
At the start of each new session, check skill-creator for pending suggestions. If suggestions exist with high confidence (3+ pattern occurrences), briefly notify the user:
> "skill-creator detected a repeating pattern: [brief description]. Run `skill-creator suggest` to review."
**Never auto-apply suggestions. Always require explicit user confirmation.** This is a core safety principle of the bounded learning system.
## When to Suggest skill-creator
**Suggest skill-creator when:**
- You notice the same sequence of steps has occurred 3+ times
- The user corrects the same kind of output repeatedly
- A workflow is complex enough to benefit from codification
- The user asks "why do I keep having to tell you this?"
**Suggest naturally:**
```
I've noticed we run the same lint -> test -> fix cycle after every code change.
Want me to capture this as a skill so it happens automatically?
```
## Auditing a Skill (counterfactual)
Pass-rate is blind to most skill effects — a skill can change behavior in hundreds of ways while pass-rate barely moves. **When a skill is created, modified, or proposed for retirement, run the `skill-counterfactual-audit` skill** before finalizing. It runs a paired probe (the same task once with the skill loaded and once without), segments and aligns both traces into goal-directed phases, and emits a SIP report (surface anchoring, template copy, excess planning, task recovery, off-task artifact). Treat its findings as the behavioral-impact signal pass-rate cannot give you: a low-impact skill is a retirement candidate; a high-negative-impact skill needs revision, not just a green test. This is the audit gate for the skill lifecycle this skill manages.
## Anti-Patterns
- Do not execute GSD phases without checking for relevant learned skills first
- Do not auto-apply skill suggestions -- always require user confirmation
- Do not load skills that exceed the token budget -- defer and note what was skipped
- Do not ignore user corrections -- they are the primary signal for skill refinement
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!