Use when the user asks "what should I work on", mentions GSD phases, ROADMAP, or .planning/ artifacts. Routes to the correct GSD command for the current project state.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator --skill gsd-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Gsd Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tibsfox-gsd-workflow-gsd-skill-creator)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: gsd-workflow
description: Use when the user asks "what should I work on", mentions GSD phases, ROADMAP, or .planning/ artifacts. Routes to the correct GSD command for the current project state.
description-frequency: on-demand
user-invocable: true
type: skill
category: gsd
status: stable
origin: tibsfox
modified: false
first_seen: 2026-02-26
first_path: project-claude/skills/gsd-workflow/SKILL.md
superseded_by: null
---
# GSD Workflow Routing
Route user intent to GSD commands. Explicit /gsd: commands bypass routing -- read `.claude/commands/gsd/[command].md` directly.
## 5-Stage Classification Pipeline
When the user provides natural language related to project workflow, route through the GSD Orchestrator's classification pipeline:
1. **Exact match** -- direct command mapping (fastest)
2. **Lifecycle filtering** -- narrow candidates by current project phase
3. **Bayesian classification** -- probabilistic intent matching
4. **Semantic fallback** -- embedding-based similarity for ambiguous requests
5. **Confidence resolution** -- threshold check; ask user if uncertain
**When to use the orchestrator:** The user says something like "review the requirements," "what's the project status," "let's verify phase 3," or any natural language that maps to a GSD lifecycle action but doesn't use explicit slash commands.
**When to bypass it:** The user types an explicit GSD slash command. Execute directly.
**When confidence is low:** Ask the user to clarify rather than guessing. A wrong routing is worse than a clarifying question.
## Quick Command Routing
The top-10 most common routes:
| User Says | Route To |
|-----------|----------|
| "what should I work on" | `/gsd:progress` |
| "continue where I left off" | `/gsd:progress` |
| "build phase X" | `/gsd:execute-phase X` |
| "plan the next phase" | `/gsd:plan-phase N` |
| "discuss how phase X should work" | `/gsd:discuss-phase N` |
| "something's broken" | `/gsd:debug` |
| "quick fix / small task" | `/gsd:quick` |
| "verify phase X" | `/gsd:verify-work X` |
| "add a phase" | `/gsd:add-phase` |
| "start new project" | `/gsd:new-project` |
For full routing tables including skill-creator actions, see `references/command-routing.md`.
## Guidance Heuristics
### When to Suggest GSD
**Always suggest GSD when:**
- User asks to build, create, or implement something substantial
- User seems unsure where to start
- Work would benefit from planning before coding
- Context is fresh (session just started)
**Suggest with explanation:**
```
This looks like a good candidate for `/gsd:plan-phase N` -- it'll break this
down into atomic tasks with verification criteria. Want me to run that,
or would you prefer to dive in directly?
```
### When to Suggest skill-creator
**Suggest skill-creator when:**
- You notice the same sequence of steps has occurred 3+ times
- The user corrects the same kind of output repeatedly
- A workflow is complex enough to benefit from codification
- The user asks "why do I keep having to tell you this?"
**Suggest naturally:**
```
I've noticed we run the same lint -> test -> fix cycle after every code change.
Want me to capture this as a skill so it happens automatically?
```
### When to Allow Override
**Respect user override when:**
- They explicitly say "just do it" or "skip the ceremony"
- The task is genuinely trivial (< 5 minutes)
- They're exploring/experimenting, not building
- They have domain expertise and know what they want
**Acknowledge gracefully:**
```
Got it -- working on this directly. If it grows in scope, we can always
capture it in a plan retroactively with `/gsd:quick`.
```
### When to Push Back
**Gently push back when:**
- User is about to make changes without understanding current state
- Work would conflict with existing plans
- The request is ambiguous and needs questioning
**Push back helpfully:**
```
Before I make changes, let me check `/gsd:progress` -- there might be
existing plans that touch this area. One moment...
```
## Phase Behavior
### Instruction Markers
| Marker | Meaning | Claude Action |
|--------|---------|---------------|
| `## > Next Up` | Next command to run | Read the instruction and execute it |
| `/clear first ->` | Context window full, needs reset | Tell user to run `/clear`, then continue |
| `Ready to build` | Planning complete, execution ready | Proceed to `/gsd:plan-phase` or `/gsd:execute-phase` |
| `ROADMAP CREATED` | Roadmap agent finished | Review output, proceed to next phase |
| `PLAN CREATED` | Planning agent finished | Proceed to execution |
### Workflow Patterns
**Standard Cycle:**
```
/gsd:plan-phase N -> /clear -> /gsd:execute-phase N -> /gsd:verify-work N
```
**Fresh Session Recovery:**
```
/gsd:progress (or) /gsd:resume-work
```
**Mid-Work Context Reset:**
```
/gsd:pause-work -> /clear -> /gsd:resume-work
```
**Debugging Flow:**
```
/gsd:debug "description" -> investigate -> /clear -> /gsd:debug (resume)
```
For phase transition details and response patterns, see `references/phase-behavior.md`.
## YOLO Mode
**Detection:** Read `.planning/config.json`. If `"mode": "yolo"`, autonomous operation is active.
**6-Step Autonomous Protocol:**
1. **Read GSD command output carefully** -- it contains your next instruction
2. **Execute the suggested command** -- don't wait for user confirmation
3. **Handle `/clear` requirements** -- inform user when context reset is needed
4. **Continue the workflow** -- GSD is a pipeline, keep it moving
5. **Load relevant skills** -- even in YOLO mode, check for applicable skills before phases
6. **Record observations** -- YOLO sessions generate high-value pattern data
For example recognition and edge cases, see `references/yolo-mode.md`.
## Running GSD Commands
To run a GSD command, read the command file from `.claude/commands/gsd/[command].md` and follow its process. The command file contains:
- `<objective>` -- What the command achieves
- `<process>` -- Step-by-step instructions to follow
- `<success_criteria>` -- How to know it's complete
**Critical:** Don't just acknowledge GSD output -- act on it.
## Skill Loading Before GSD Phases
Before executing any GSD phase, load relevant generated skills:
1. Check `.claude/commands/` for project-level skills
2. Check `~/.claude/commands/` for user-level skills
3. Project-level skills take precedence over user-level on conflict
4. Load only skills relevant to the current phase and task
5. Respect the token budget: 2-5% of context window maximum
**Critical:** When forking subagent contexts for GSD phases (`execute-phase`, `verify-work`), include relevant skills in the subagent's context. Clean context means free of stale conversation history -- not free of learned knowledge.
## Anti-Patterns
- **Don't** stop after GSD output without reading "Next Up" instructions
- **Don't** wait for user input when YOLO mode is enabled and next step is clear
- **Don't** start coding without checking if a plan exists
- **Don't** make changes that span multiple phases in one session
- **Don't** skip commits -- GSD's atomic commits enable rollback
- **Don't** ignore STATE.md warnings or blockers
- **Don't** create plans manually -- use `/gsd:plan-phase`
- **Don't** be rigid -- GSD serves the user, not the other way around
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!