Skip to content
Back to skills

Wiki Research Sboghossian

ASecurity

Use when a user asks about legal research methodology, how to structure a research workflow, source-triangulation techniques, hypothesis-driven legal analysis, or how to find and verify primary and secondary legal authorities across MENA and international jurisdictions. Provides a comprehensive reference on research process design for legal professionals and AI-assisted legal tools.

  • 85 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 8, 2026
ai-agentsgoawsgitdatabase

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 8, 2026

npx -y skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill wiki-research-sboghossian --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Wiki Research Sboghossian?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Wiki Research Sboghossian
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/thomasmoreai-wiki-research-sboghossian/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thomasmoreai-wiki-research-sboghossian)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
---
name: wiki-research-sboghossian
title: Legal Research Methodology
description: Use when a user asks about legal research methodology, how to structure a research workflow, source-triangulation techniques, hypothesis-driven legal analysis, or how to find and verify primary and secondary legal authorities across MENA and international jurisdictions. Provides a comprehensive reference on research process design for legal professionals and AI-assisted legal tools.
author: sboghossian
author_url: https://github.com/sboghossian/mini-claude-for-legal/tree/main/skills/wiki/wiki-research
license: MIT
version: 0.1.0
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: general
practice: general
language: en
---

# Legal Research Methodology

## Scope

This knowledge pack covers legal research workflows, hypothesis-driven analysis, and source-triangulation practices used by legal professionals and legal AI tools. It applies across all jurisdictions but highlights specific MENA considerations where the research landscape differs from common-law traditions.

---

## Core Principle: Hypothesis-Driven Research

Effective legal research is not a library browse — it is a structured inquiry process anchored to a specific legal question. The hypothesis-driven model:

1. **State the legal question precisely.** "Can a Lebanese employer terminate a fixed-term contract before expiry without triggering Article 50 liability?" is researchable. "Is termination legal?" is not.
2. **Form an initial hypothesis.** Based on plain reading of applicable law, form a working answer. This prevents confirmation bias — you are looking to test the hypothesis, not confirm it.
3. **Identify the source hierarchy** for the applicable jurisdiction (see below).
4. **Research primary sources first.** Statute, decree-law, regulation, case law in that order.
5. **Triangulate.** Cross-check the conclusion across at least three independent authoritative sources before treating it as reliable.
6. **Identify counter-arguments.** Actively seek authority that contradicts the hypothesis; document it.
7. **State conclusions with confidence levels.** Well-settled law vs. contested vs. unsettled.

---

## Source Hierarchy by Jurisdiction Type

### Civil-Law Jurisdictions (Lebanon, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE-onshore, France)

| Tier | Source type | Notes |
|------|-------------|-------|
| 1 | Constitution | Hierarchy baseline |
| 2 | Codified statutes / decree-laws | Official Gazette versions authoritative |
| 3 | Executive regulations / ministerial decisions | Often amend statutes operationally |
| 4 | Judicial decisions | Persuasive, not binding precedent (unlike common law) |
| 5 | Academic doctrine (fiqh / doctrine) | Influential in KSA; in LB, leading treatises cited in court |
| 6 | Comparative law / Model laws | Useful for gap-filling in unsettled areas |

Civil-law research trap: published case law is sparse and court databases are incomplete. A single favorable decision is weak authority; look for consistent court of cassation lines.

### Common-Law Jurisdictions (DIFC, ADGM, UK, US)

| Tier | Source type | Notes |
|------|-------------|-------|
| 1 | Statute / Regulations | DIFC Laws; ADGM Regulations |
| 2 | Binding precedent | Court of Appeals and above |
| 3 | Persuasive precedent | Other common-law jurisdictions, lower courts |
| 4 | Academic commentary | Annotated statutes, leading treatises |
| 5 | Regulatory guidance | FCA, DFSA, FSRA guidance notes |

### Islamic Law Overlay (KSA, potentially UAE)

In Saudi Arabia, Sharia principles are a primary source of law. Research must consider:
- Relevant Quran and Sunnah provisions as interpreted by contemporary Islamic jurisprudence
- SAMA / SAFCSP regulatory circulars that translate Sharia compliance into operational rules
- Fatwas from recognized bodies (e.g., Council of Senior Scholars) for novel instruments
- The distinction between prohibited (haram) elements (riba, gharar, maysir) and permissible commercial structures

---

## Research Workflow (Step by Step)

### Phase 1 — Issue Spotting (5–10 min)
- Decompose the client problem into discrete legal issues
- Map each issue to: applicable jurisdiction + applicable body of law (contract, tort, regulatory, etc.)
- Prioritize issues by materiality and by deadline pressure

### Phase 2 — Primary Source Search (20–40 min)
- Identify the controlling statute or regulation
- Read the relevant provisions in the original language if possible (Arabic text controls in most MENA civil-law jurisdictions)
- For UAE: check Federal level + Emirate level (some subjects are dual-regulated)
- For KSA: check Royal Decrees via Nizam platform; check ministerial resolutions
- For DIFC/ADGM: search the official DIFC Laws portal / ADGM Legal Portal

### Phase 3 — Case Law Search (15–30 min)
- Civil law: use official court publication databases where available; academic research databases for Lebanon (Lexis Nexis Lebanon), KSA, Egypt
- Common law: Westlaw, LexisNexis, DIFC Courts public judgments
- Search by statutory article number, not just keywords — courts cite articles

### Phase 4 — Secondary Source Triangulation (10–20 min)
- Review at least one leading academic treatise or bar association commentary
- For MENA issues: top regional law review articles (Arab Law Quarterly, Middle East Law and Governance)
- Check practitioner alerts from major regional firms (published as client updates)

### Phase 5 — Synthesis and Confidence Assessment
State the conclusion in structured form:
```
Issue: [precise question]
Governing law: [statute / instrument]
Analysis: [reasoning chain]
Conclusion: [answer]
Confidence: [High / Medium / Low] — [reason for uncertainty if medium/low]
Counter-argument: [strongest opposing view, if any]
Sources: [numbered list]
```

---

## MENA-Specific Research Challenges

- **Language**: statutes in Arabic; many English translations are unofficial and may not reflect the latest amendments. Always note which version you relied on.
- **Date of amendment**: MENA legislation is frequently amended by ministerial decision without consolidated re-publication. Check the Official Gazette for amendments after the base statute.
- **Unpublished decisions**: courts in LB, EG, KSA do not publish all decisions. A "there is no case law" finding often means there is no published case law — different things.
- **Regulatory circulars**: SAMA, CBUAE, CMA, BdL each issue circulars that effectively amend primary law without legislative process. These must be researched separately.
- **Sharia variation**: Hanbali school governs KSA; Maliki and Hanafi influence LB/EG. Conclusions from one school may not transfer.

---

## AI-Assisted Research Protocols

When legal AI tools (including this assistant) perform research:

1. **Primary source first** — AI should never substitute synthesized summaries for actual primary source text on a point of law. Quote the provision.
2. **Hallucination guard** — Article numbers, case citations, and regulatory thresholds must be verified independently. Do not rely on AI-generated citations without checking the source document.
3. **Triangulate AI output** — treat AI summary as a starting point, not a conclusion. Run the same query across two independent channels.
4. **Note knowledge cutoff** — AI models have training cutoffs; legislative amendments after the cutoff will be missed.
5. **Jurisdiction specificity** — prompt with "under [specific statute/jurisdiction]" to reduce generic output.

---

## How to Use This Pack

Use this pack as a methodology reference when:
- Setting up a research protocol for a new matter
- Training junior lawyers or AI-assisted legal tools on research quality standards
- Auditing the reliability of AI-generated legal conclusions
- Building research templates for frequently-recurring legal questions

---

## Caveats & Currency

Research standards evolve as new databases, regulatory portals, and AI tools become available. The MENA legal database landscape has improved significantly since 2020 but remains less comprehensive than US/UK equivalents. Verify the current availability of databases in your jurisdiction before designing a research workflow.

## Related Skills

- [[wiki-topic]]
- [[wiki-strategy]]
- [[research-jurisdiction-comparison]]
- [[review-contract-redline]]
- [[heuristic-always-state-jurisdiction-first]]

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.