Skip to content
Back to skills

Tx Quality Check Codearranger

ASecurity

'Use to QC, review, or validate a Texas court document before filing. Triggers: "quality check Texas filing", "is my Texas motion ready to file", "pre-filing review Texas", "QC this Texas document", "check this petition before I file it in Texas", "validate this Texas affidavit", "audit this Texas packet", "is my Harris County motion ready", "review my Texas answer". Runs two passes plus a packet sweep: (1) format pass — caption and form, document title, Tex. R. Civ. P. 57 signature with Stat...

  • 85 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 8, 2026
ai-agentspythongitsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 8, 2026

npx -y skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill tx-quality-check-codearranger --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Tx Quality Check Codearranger?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Tx Quality Check Codearranger
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/thomasmoreai-tx-quality-check-codearranger/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thomasmoreai-tx-quality-check-codearranger)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
---
name: tx-quality-check-codearranger
title: Texas Pre-Filing Quality Check
description: 'Use to QC, review, or validate a Texas court document before filing. Triggers: "quality check Texas filing", "is my Texas motion ready to file", "pre-filing review Texas", "QC this Texas document", "check this petition before I file it in Texas", "validate this Texas affidavit", "audit this Texas packet", "is my Harris County motion ready", "review my Texas answer". Runs two passes plus a packet sweep: (1) format pass — caption and form, document title, Tex. R. Civ. P. 57 signature with State Bar of Texas bar number (or self-represented designation), line numbering + footer + "Page X of Y", Tex. R. Civ. P. 21a certificate of service, and the Tex. R. Civ. P. 47(c) relief-range statement on a petition; (2) content pass — relief and grounds stated, Notice of Hearing timing, verified denial where required, affirmative defenses pleaded, required attachments including the proposed order. Lighter touch than `tx-fact-check`, which deep-dives evidentiary citations and sworn-vs-argued
  alignment.'
author: codearranger
author_url: https://github.com/codearranger/claude-legal/tree/main/plugins/tx-court-docs/skills/tx-quality-check
license: MIT
version: 0.1.0
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: us
practice: litigation
language: en
---

# Texas Pre-Filing Quality Check

> **NOT LEGAL ADVICE.** This skill detects errors in form and
> structural completeness — it verifies the **surface**. It does not
> assess whether the underlying legal position is sound. Verify
> against the current Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and the local
> rules of the filing court before filing.

Use this skill as the **last step** before filing any Texas court
document. Two passes, plus a packet-consistency sweep.

## A note on the forum

Confirm the **court level** before the format pass — District Court,
County Court at Law / Constitutional County Court, or Justice Court
(JP). Caption wording and judge title differ, and **justice-court
procedure is simplified**: under Tex. R. Civ. P. 500.3(e) the regular
rules of civil procedure and the rules of evidence largely do **not**
apply in justice court except where TRCP Part V (Rules 500–510)
incorporates them. Route family-law filings to `tx-family-court` for
the matching caption and the **Petitioner/Respondent** designations
(rather than Plaintiff/Defendant).

## Pass 1 — Format

For a generated filing, run `scripts/format-check.py` first:

```
python3 plugins/tx-court-docs/scripts/format-check.py path/to/filing.docx
```

The format-check script validates the marketplace common-practice
defaults (line numbering, footer, "Page X of Y", caption, signature)
against the Texas baseline. Where a value is a local-rule matter, the
script emits **WARN** (not FAIL) — resolve those by checking the
venue's local rules. Resolve any **FAIL** before continuing.

### Format pass — non-`.docx` (markdown / text drafts)

Verify manually:

- **Caption** — names of the parties, the court (e.g., "In the [Nth]
  Judicial District Court of [County] County, Texas"), party
  designations (Plaintiff/Defendant; Petitioner/Respondent in
  family/special matters), the **cause number**, and the document
  title
- **Pleading form (Tex. R. Civ. P. 45 / 47)** — a plain statement of
  the cause of action; numbered paragraphs; and, on a petition, the
  **Tex. R. Civ. P. 47(c) statement of the range of relief sought**
  (a Texas requirement — its omission can bar a default judgment)
- **Motion form (Tex. R. Civ. P. 21)** — states the grounds and the
  relief sought; "TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE" opener; PRAYER closes
- **Notice of Hearing (Tex. R. Civ. P. 21)** — present where a motion
  is being set; submission vs. oral hearing chosen; the notice floor
  (or the Rule 166a 21-day track) confirmed
- **Signature block (Tex. R. Civ. P. 57)** — name, address, telephone,
  email, fax, and **State Bar of Texas bar number** if an attorney, or
  the **pro se / self-represented** designation if not
- **Certificate of Service (Tex. R. Civ. P. 21a)** — date, manner of
  service, and each recipient (and the eFileTexas e-service confirmation
  where e-filed)
- **Line numbering + footer present** with **"Page X of Y"** and the
  document title
- **Sensitive-data handling** — confirm the redaction practice (e.g.,
  truncating Social Security and financial-account numbers) before
  filing

## Pass 2 — Content

The content check applies the pro-se drafting framework. Citation
resolution is delegated to **tx-fact-check**; this pass confirms the
component is structurally complete.

### For a motion:

- [ ] **Relief stated clearly** in the opening paragraph (Rule 21)
- [ ] **Grounds stated** for the relief
- [ ] **Rule or statute citation** that grants the relief (e.g.,
      Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a summary judgment; Rule 91a dismissal;
      CPRC § ___)
- [ ] **Numbered factual paragraphs** with record cites (affidavit/
      declaration ¶, petition ¶, exhibit, admission)
- [ ] **Application of controlling Texas authority** — case law
      applied to the facts (citations verified by `tx-fact-check`)
- [ ] **Counter-arguments addressed**
- [ ] **PRAYER** — what exactly should the court do?
- [ ] **Notice of Hearing** prepared with the Rule 21(b) notice floor
      (or Rule 166a **21-day** track), consistent with `tx-deadlines`
- [ ] For **Rule 166a(i) no-evidence**: the **specific elements** with
      no evidence are stated
- [ ] For **Rule 91a**: filed within **60 days** of the challenged
      pleading; rests on the pleadings only
- [ ] **Proposed order** drafted as a separate document (`tx-draft-order`)

### For a petition:

- [ ] **Tex. R. Civ. P. 47(c) statement of relief range** present
- [ ] **Discovery control plan level** stated (Tex. R. Civ. P. 190 —
      Level 1/2/3; expedited actions under Rule 169)
- [ ] **Jurisdiction and venue** alleged
- [ ] **Numbered paragraphs**; plain statement of each cause of action
- [ ] **PRAYER** for relief; request for citation to issue

### For an affidavit / unsworn declaration:

- [ ] **Personal-knowledge foundation** in the opening paragraph
- [ ] **Numbered factual paragraphs** — facts only, no argument
- [ ] **Exhibit references** match the attached exhibits
- [ ] **Jurat** (notarized affidavit) **or** a **CPRC § 132.001
      unsworn declaration** under penalty of perjury (no notary), with
      the prescribed jurat (printed name, date of birth, address,
      county and state of execution)
- [ ] For a **business-records** affidavit, the custodian /
      qualified-witness foundation under Tex. R. Evid. 902(10)

### For a proposed order / judgment:

- [ ] **Caption identical** to the underlying motion
- [ ] **Recitals separate from the decretal clause** ("IT IS ORDERED")
- [ ] **Decretal clause mirrors** the motion's PRAYER, item by item
- [ ] **A final judgment disposes of all parties and all claims** (or
      the interlocutory status is intended and clear)
- [ ] **Judge signature / "SIGNED this ___ day" line** at the foot;
      "submitted by" line; transmittal consistent with `tx-submit-order`

### For an Original Answer:

- [ ] **General denial** (Tex. R. Civ. P. 92) and/or specific denials
- [ ] **Verified denial under oath** where Tex. R. Civ. P. 93 requires
      it (e.g., denial of a **sworn account** under Rule 93(10) / Rule
      185, lack of capacity, defect of parties) — an unverified denial
      may fail to put the matter in issue
- [ ] **Affirmative defenses pleaded** (limitations, payment, lack of
      standing, etc.) — defenses not pleaded may be waived
- [ ] **Compulsory counterclaims** stated (Tex. R. Civ. P. 97)
- [ ] **Timeliness** — answer deadline confirmed against the return of
      service via `tx-deadlines` (the Rule 99 "Monday rule" in
      district/county court; the **end of the 14th day** after service
      in justice court under Rule 502.5)

## Pass 3 — Packet consistency

If filing a packet (petition/motion + proposed order + Notice of
Hearing + affidavit/declaration + certificate of service + civil case
information sheet):

- [ ] **Same caption** across all documents — court, county, party
      names, cause number
- [ ] **Same document title** referenced in the certificate of service,
      the Notice of Hearing, and the proposed order
- [ ] **Dates align** — certificate-of-service date matches the
      signature date; affidavit jurat / declaration date consistent;
      hearing/submission date respects the notice floor
- [ ] **Relief sought matches** between motion (PRAYER) and proposed
      order (item by item)
- [ ] **All referenced exhibits** attached

## Pre-flight checklist

| Check | Done |
|-------|------|
| Forum confirmed (District / County Court at Law / Justice Court) | ☐ |
| `scripts/format-check.py` run; no FAIL (WARN items confirmed against local rules) | ☐ |
| Caption shows court, county, party designations, cause number | ☐ |
| Pleading/motion form correct; petition carries the Rule 47(c) relief range | ☐ |
| Notice of Hearing meets the notice floor (or Rule 166a 21-day track) | ☐ |
| Signature block has State Bar of Texas number (attorney) or self-represented designation (Rule 57) | ☐ |
| Certificate of Service shows manner, date, recipients (Rule 21a) | ☐ |
| Footer carries document title + "Page X of Y" | ☐ |
| Verified denial filed where Rule 93 requires it (answer) | ☐ |
| Affirmative defenses pleaded (answer) | ☐ |
| Final judgment disposes of all parties and claims | ☐ |
| Proposed order prepared as a separate document | ☐ |
| `tx-fact-check` deep audit run (if high-stakes filing) | ☐ |

## Common Texas pre-filing failures

1. **Missing Tex. R. Civ. P. 47(c) relief-range statement** on a
   petition — can bar a default judgment.
2. **Unverified denial of a sworn account** — Tex. R. Civ. P. 93(10) /
   Rule 185 require a denial **under oath**; a bare general denial does
   not put a properly verified account in issue.
3. **No-evidence motion that fails to state the specific elements** —
   Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(i) requires the motion to identify the elements
   on which there is no evidence.
4. **Notice of Hearing short of the notice floor** (or the Rule 166a
   21-day track) once the +3-day mail/email add-on is counted.
5. **Missing State Bar of Texas number or self-represented
   designation** in the Tex. R. Civ. P. 57 signature block.
6. **A "final" judgment that does not dispose of all parties and
   claims** — it is interlocutory and generally not appealable.

## Composition

- For the deep evidentiary-citation and sworn-vs-argued review:
  `tx-fact-check`
- For the format baseline (caption / Rule 21 / Rule 57 / Rule 21a):
  `tx-statewide-format`
- For drafting each component: `tx-draft-motion`,
  `tx-draft-declaration`, `tx-draft-note`, `tx-draft-order`
- For deadline arithmetic (notice floor, Rule 166a 21-day track, mail
  add-on, the Rule 99 "Monday rule"): `tx-deadlines`
- For the forum/venue: `tx-hcdc`, `tx-dcdc`, `tx-county-courts`,
  `tx-family-court`
- For the final filing step (eFileTexas assembly): `tx-file-packet`

## References to author

- `references/format-checklist.md` — the format pass expanded
- `references/content-checklist.md` — the per-document-type content
  pass expanded

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.