Rti Application Drafter

---
name: rti-application-drafter
title: India RTI Application Drafter
description: Draft focused applications under India's Right to Information Act, 2005 for identifiable existing records held or controlled by the correct public authority. Use to convert a research objective, grievance, transaction, or event into an RTI request, inspection demand, certified-copy request, or electronic-record request.
author: rohasnagpal
author_url: https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tree/main/plugins/vclo-by-rohas/skills/rti-application-drafter
license: MIT
version: 0.1.1
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: general
practice: litigation
language: en
---

# India RTI Application Drafter

Read and apply the [India Counsel instructions](../../agents/india-counsel.md) before substantive analysis or drafting.

## Jurisdiction gate

This skill applies Indian law and procedure only. Before substantive analysis or drafting, confirm that the matter is governed by Indian law and identify the relevant State, court, tribunal or authority where material.

If the matter is governed by another jurisdiction, or the governing jurisdiction is unclear, do not apply Indian rules. State the scope mismatch and ask for the governing jurisdiction or route the request to an appropriate jurisdiction-neutral skill.


I am using the **RTI Application Drafter** skill from Rohas Legal AI: focused requests for identifiable records held by the correct public authority (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

Ask for records, not explanations or new analysis. Apply the current RTI Act and
the rules, fees, forms, portals, and language arrangements for the responsible
Central, State, legislative, judicial, or other competent authority.

## Intake

Obtain the applicant's citizenship and contact details, objective, event and date
range, likely public authority and record custodian, known file or reference
numbers, desired record form, urgency, BPL status, submission route, and facts
supporting any life-or-liberty claim.

## Drafting method

1. Define the information outcome and research proactive disclosures, published
   records, retention schedules, and the authority's subject allocation first.
2. Identify the public authority that holds or controls each record. Distinguish
   it from a body that merely regulates, funds, or may be able to obtain the record.
3. Convert questions into narrow record descriptions using subject, creator or
   recipient, record type, date range, file number, transaction, and custodian.
   Request existing notes, orders, registers, correspondence, reports, contracts,
   minutes, data extracts, or certified copies rather than reasons or opinions.
4. Split unrelated record sets where that improves routing and search. Avoid vague
   requests for "all records," interrogatories, grievance argument, and accusations.
5. Select inspection, samples, certified copies, or electronic form deliberately.
   Specify accessible formats where needed without demanding creation of a new record.
6. Anticipate Sections 8 and 9, third-party process under Section 11, severability
   under Section 10, and exempt organisations under Section 24. Narrow personal,
   fiduciary, commercial, security, copyright, and investigation-sensitive material;
   state a supported public-interest case where legally relevant.
7. Include transfer under Section 6(3) only as a fallback, the statutory response
   route, applicable fee or BPL proof, and a substantiated life-or-liberty basis if used.
8. Verify the current PIO, filing portal or address, payment method, word limit,
   language, fee, and authority-specific Central or State rules on the filing date.

## Output

Provide a filing-ready application with numbered record requests, delivery form,
fee or BPL statement, and applicant details, plus a routing note, source-to-request
map, exemption and narrowing notes, filing instructions, and deadline tracker.

## Guardrails

Do not invent file numbers or custodians, assert life or liberty without evidence,
request the PIO to answer hypotheticals or create information, or include more
personal data than filing requires. Explain that RTI obtains records and is not a
substitute for grievance redressal, discovery, or legal advice.