Skip to content
Back to skills

Mi Draft Motion Codearranger

ASecurity

This skill should be used to scaffold a Michigan civil motion with its notice of hearing and supporting brief. Triggers include "draft a Michigan motion", "MCR 2.119 motion", "draft a Michigan motion for summary disposition", "motion for summary disposition MCR 2.116", "draft an MCR 2.116(C)(8) motion", "draft an MCR 2.116(C)(10) motion", "Michigan brief in support", "draft a Michigan motion to compel", and "draft a notice of hearing for a Michigan motion". Produces a motion plus notice of he...

  • 85 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added October 8, 2026
ai-agentsgogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 8, 2026

npx -y skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill mi-draft-motion-codearranger --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Mi Draft Motion Codearranger?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Mi Draft Motion Codearranger
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/thomasmoreai-mi-draft-motion-codearranger/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thomasmoreai-mi-draft-motion-codearranger)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
---
name: mi-draft-motion-codearranger
title: Draft a Michigan Motion
description: This skill should be used to scaffold a Michigan civil motion with its notice of hearing and supporting brief. Triggers include "draft a Michigan motion", "MCR 2.119 motion", "draft a Michigan motion for summary disposition", "motion for summary disposition MCR 2.116", "draft an MCR 2.116(C)(8) motion", "draft an MCR 2.116(C)(10) motion", "Michigan brief in support", "draft a Michigan motion to compel", and "draft a notice of hearing for a Michigan motion". Produces a motion plus notice of hearing plus supporting brief in Michigan format, applying the pro-se drafting framework (state the relief, cite the rule, state supporting facts, apply controlling Michigan authority, conclude). Composes with `mi-statewide-format` for the caption and signature, `mi-draft-declaration` for sworn facts, `mi-draft-order` for the proposed order, `mi-draft-note` for the notice of hearing, and the relevant venue overlay.
author: codearranger
author_url: https://github.com/codearranger/claude-legal/tree/main/plugins/mi-court-docs/skills/mi-draft-motion
license: MIT
version: 0.1.0
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: us
practice: litigation
language: en
---

# Draft a Michigan Motion

> **NOT LEGAL ADVICE.** This skill scaffolds a draft motion as a
> drafting aid. The user — not the skill — chooses the motion
> type, the theory of relief, and the strategy. Verify every
> rule, deadline, and citation against the current Michigan Court
> Rules and controlling case law before filing.

Use this skill to produce a **motion + notice of hearing +
supporting brief** in Michigan format. The form and content of
motions is governed by **MCR 2.119**. The caption, signature
block (with the attorney's State Bar **P-number**), and proof of
service follow `mi-statewide-format`.

## MCR 2.119 — form and content of motions

**MCR 2.119(A)** governs the motion itself:

- **MCR 2.119(A)(1)** — a motion must be in writing (unless made
  during a hearing or trial), state with particularity the grounds
  and authority on which it is based, and state the relief or
  order sought.
- **MCR 2.119(A)(2)** — a **separate brief** supporting a motion
  or response is **required** for certain motions (notably motions
  brought under MCR 2.116 — summary disposition), and the brief
  must be filed and served with the motion or response. For other
  motions a brief may be filed but is not required. Verify the
  current text of MCR 2.119(A)(2) for which motion types require
  the separate brief.
- **MCR 2.119(A)(3)** — a motion or response that presents an
  issue of fact must be supported by an **affidavit** or other
  evidence (see `mi-draft-declaration`).

**MCR 2.119(C)** sets the timing for serving and filing a written
motion and any response (the standard notice period and the
response deadline) — confirm the current periods and compute the
dates with `mi-deadlines`.

**MCR 2.119(E)** addresses hearings on motions and when a court
may dispense with oral argument.

## Page limits and typography

Michigan does not set a single universal motion page limit in MCR
2.119; **page limits, line spacing, and chambers-copy or
courtesy-copy requirements are commonly set by LOCAL court rules
(LCR) and the assigned judge's practice guidelines**. Check the
local rules of the filing court and the judge's standing orders
before finalizing. Do not hard-code a page count here — see
`mi-statewide-format` and the venue overlay, and consult
`mi-law-references` for the corpus of court rules.

## Motion + notice of hearing + brief structure

```
                  [Caption — see mi-statewide-format]

         [DOCUMENT TITLE IN ALL CAPS, e.g.,
     DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION
     PURSUANT TO MCR 2.116(C)(10)]

[Movant], [Plaintiff / Defendant], by [counsel / in propria
persona], pursuant to MCR 2.119 and MCR [specific rule, e.g.,
2.116(C)(10)], moves the Court for [specific relief]. The grounds
and authority for this Motion are stated with particularity below
and in the accompanying Brief in Support:

1. [Ground one — particular statement of fact + authority.]

2. [Ground two.]

WHEREFORE, [Movant] respectfully requests that the Court [grant
the relief sought] and enter the accompanying proposed Order.

                                     [Signature block —
                                      see mi-statewide-format]
```

### Notice of hearing

```
                  [Caption — see mi-statewide-format]

                       NOTICE OF HEARING

TO: [opposing party / counsel]
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the foregoing Motion will be brought on
for hearing before the Honorable [Judge] on [date] at [time], or
as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard.
                                     [Signature block]
```
See `mi-draft-note` and `mi-schedule-hearing` for the notice and
date-setting mechanics.

### Brief in support

```
                  [Caption — see mi-statewide-format]

     BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR
     SUMMARY DISPOSITION

                       I. INTRODUCTION
[1-2 paragraph summary of the case, the relief sought, and the
reasons in headline form.]

                  II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
[Numbered factual paragraphs. Each material fact gets a record
citation — Affidavit ¶ X, Complaint ¶ X, Exhibit X, deposition
page/line, or admission in pleadings. Sworn facts belong in an
affidavit; see mi-draft-declaration.]

                  III. STANDARD OF REVIEW
[State the governing standard for the motion type — e.g., the
applicable MCR 2.116 subrule standard described below.]

                       IV. ARGUMENT
A. [Headline of first argument.]
[Lead with the rule citation; state the controlling standard;
apply it to the facts; cite controlling Michigan authority.]

B. [Headline of second argument.]

                       V. RELIEF REQUESTED
For the foregoing reasons, [Movant] respectfully requests that the
Court [grant the motion] and enter the accompanying proposed Order.
                                     [Signature block]
```

## Summary disposition — MCR 2.116 and the *Maiden* standard

The most common dispositive motion in Michigan is the **motion for
summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)**, with the ground
identified by subrule:

- **MCR 2.116(C)(7)** — the claim is barred (e.g., release, prior
  judgment, statute of limitations, immunity, prior pending
  action). The court considers the pleadings plus any affidavits,
  depositions, admissions, or documentary evidence; well-pleaded
  factual allegations are accepted as true unless contradicted by
  the documentary evidence.
- **MCR 2.116(C)(8)** — failure to state a claim on which relief
  can be granted. Tested on the **pleadings alone**; the motion is
  granted only if the claim is so clearly unenforceable that no
  factual development could justify recovery.
- **MCR 2.116(C)(10)** — no genuine issue of material fact and the
  moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Tested
  on the pleadings **and the documentary evidence** submitted; the
  evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving
  party.

The governing standard is set out in **Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich
109; 597 NW2d 817 (1999)** (verify the citation and the current
case law refining it before relying on it). *Maiden* describes the
distinct evidentiary tests for (C)(8) vs. (C)(10): a (C)(8) motion
is decided on the pleadings, while a (C)(10) motion requires the
court to consider the substantively admissible evidence and,
where the moving party meets its initial burden, shifts to the
nonmovant to set forth specific facts showing a genuine issue for
trial — the nonmovant may not rest on mere allegations.

> A (C)(10) motion is typically accompanied by supporting
> **affidavits** and documentary exhibits (see
> `mi-draft-declaration`); MCR 2.116(G) governs the supporting and
> opposing materials and the timing. Confirm the current subrule
> text.

## Common motion types

| Motion | Rule | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Motion for Summary Disposition | MCR 2.116(C)(7)/(8)/(10) | *Maiden* standard; separate brief required (MCR 2.119(A)(2)); (C)(8) on pleadings, (C)(10) on evidence |
| Motion to Compel Discovery | MCR 2.313 | Attach the deficient responses; check the local-rule meet-and-confer / concurrence requirement |
| Motion for Reconsideration | MCR 2.119(F) | Within **21 days** of the order; must show palpable error (verify current text) |
| Motion for Relief from Judgment | MCR 2.612 | Mistake, newly discovered evidence, fraud, void judgment, etc. |
| Motion in Limine | (inherent / MRE) | Pre-trial; anticipated evidentiary disputes |

## The pro-se drafting framework — applied to motions

Self-represented filers should follow the **pro-se drafting
framework** (see `mi-pro-se`):

1. **State the relief clearly** in the opening sentence.
2. **Cite the rule** (MCR ____) that grants the court power to
   award that relief, with particularity per MCR 2.119(A)(1).
3. **State the facts** that satisfy each element of the standard,
   with record citations to a supporting affidavit.
4. **Apply the controlling Michigan case law** to those facts.
5. **Conclude** with the specific order sought, and attach a
   proposed Order (see `mi-draft-order`).

## Filing checklist

- [ ] Caption matches the assigned court and county
- [ ] Title in ALL CAPS centered below the caption
- [ ] Grounds, authority, and relief stated with particularity (MCR 2.119(A)(1))
- [ ] Separate Brief in Support filed where required (MCR 2.119(A)(2))
- [ ] Issues of fact supported by affidavit/evidence (MCR 2.119(A)(3))
- [ ] For MCR 2.116: correct (C) subrule identified; supporting evidence attached for (C)(10)
- [ ] All cited rules and authorities correct (run `mi-fact-check`)
- [ ] Within any applicable local-rule page limit
- [ ] Proposed Order drafted as a **separate** document (`mi-draft-order`)
- [ ] Notice of Hearing prepared (`mi-draft-note`, `mi-schedule-hearing`)
- [ ] Proof of Service complete (MCR 2.107)
- [ ] Format check passes (`scripts/format-check.py`)

## Composition

- For format, caption, and signature block: `mi-statewide-format`
- For the supporting affidavit: `mi-draft-declaration`
- For the proposed order: `mi-draft-order`
- For the notice of hearing / setting the hearing: `mi-draft-note`,
  `mi-schedule-hearing`
- For the venue overlay: `mi-wayne`, `mi-oakland`,
  `mi-circuit-courts`, `mi-district-courts`, `mi-36th-district`
- For pre-filing QC: `mi-quality-check`, `mi-fact-check`
- For deadline math: `mi-deadlines`
- For pro se conventions: `mi-pro-se`
- For the court-rules corpus and page-limit lookups:
  `mi-law-references`

## References to author

- `references/motion-template.md` — annotated motion + notice +
  brief template
- `references/summary-disposition-standard.md` — MCR 2.116(C)
  subrules + the *Maiden v Rozwood* standard
- `references/argument-structure.md` — pro-se drafting framework
  applied to a Michigan motion

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.