Skip to content
Back to skills

Legal Diagram Sam Zhai

ASecurity

Use when a user needs a legal or legal-adjacent Mermaid diagram from a document, pasted text, matter description, process, timeline, party map, obligation map, corporate structure, funds flow, or compliance workflow. Trigger on: "diagram this contract", "visualise this deal/matter", "map the parties", "create a timeline of events", "make an org chart", "obligation checklist", "export as HTML diagram". Not for general-purpose non-legal diagrams, pure graphic design, image generation, or legal ...

  • 85 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 8, 2026
ai-agentspythongonodetestinggit

Works with

  • claude web
  • cli

Security analysis

A92/100
  • mediumInstalls packages at runtime which could introduce malicious dependencies

Pro shows the line behind each finding and how to fix it

Scanned October 8, 2026

npx -y skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill legal-diagram-sam-zhai --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Legal Diagram Sam Zhai?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Legal Diagram Sam Zhai
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/thomasmoreai-legal-diagram-sam-zhai/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thomasmoreai-legal-diagram-sam-zhai)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
---
name: legal-diagram-sam-zhai
title: 'Legal diagram'
description: 'Use when a user needs a legal or legal-adjacent Mermaid diagram from a document, pasted text, matter description, process, timeline, party map, obligation map, corporate structure, funds flow, or compliance workflow. Trigger on: "diagram this contract", "visualise this deal/matter", "map the parties", "create a timeline of events", "make an org chart", "obligation checklist", "export as HTML diagram". Not for general-purpose non-legal diagrams, pure graphic design, image generation, or legal advice.'
author: Sam Zhai
author_url: https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/tree/main/skills/legal-diagram-sam-zhai
license: MIT
version: 0.1.1
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: general
practice: general
language: en
sources:
- title: Extraction schema
  path: references/extraction-schema.md
---

# /legal-diagram

Standalone skill: turn legal material into a context-appropriate Mermaid diagram, with an optional downloadable HTML figure. A structure-preserving Python engine extracts a typed ground truth; directive-driven LLM enrichment fills the gaps; a selector picks the diagram type; the diagram is generated natively.

## Routing gate

Every real diagram request runs in this fixed order: first-run check, ingest, build-mode gate, generate, report gate. Non-diagram intents short-circuit at Step 0.

Three human gates = mandatory hard stops: GATE 0 (tutorial offer), GATE A (build mode), GATE B (HTML report). Gate discipline, no exceptions:

- Present each as structured choice (the question tool). No such tool → numbered plain-text list. Either way, STOP, wait for reply.
- Never skip a gate. Never infer its answer from wording. Never generate past an unanswered gate. Detailed, specific, or named-diagram request = still a request, not a gate answer.
- Only a literal typed flag may pre-answer: `--direct`/`--guided` (GATE A), `--html` (GATE B), `--tutorial` (tutorial). Nothing else counts.

### Step 0 — Intent and first-run

Check explicit short-circuits first:

1. **Tutorial** signals: "tutorial", "show me how", "first time", "demo", "walk me through", `--tutorial`. → Load `workflows/tutorial.md`. Stop here.
2. **Setup** signals: "check setup", "install deps", "is setup ready". → Load `shared/setup-check.md`, run `check_setup.py`, report. Stop here.

Otherwise this is a real diagram request (a file, pasted text, or a matter description). Detect first-run:

Run `python scripts/first_run.py`. Parse `{state}`: `returning`, `first_run`, or `unknown`. Script absent, non-zero exit, or no JSON → treat as `unknown`.

- `returning` (confirmed) → no offer; user ran skill before. Continue to Step 1.
- `first_run`, `unknown`, or anything not a confirmed `returning` → **GATE 0** (hard stop): "First time here. Want a quick tutorial, or go straight to your diagram?" Options: **Start tutorial** (recommended, list first) / **Skip, straight to my diagram**. Present as structured choice, or numbered plain-text list if host has no choice tool, then STOP, wait for reply. After answer, run `python scripts/first_run.py --mark` to record offer (best-effort; on `unknown` state with no writable disk, mark may not persist, fine). Then: tutorial → load `workflows/tutorial.md`, stop; skip → continue to Step 1.

`unknown` defaults to offering, not suppressing: surface the choice, do not decide for user. Suppress only on confirmed `returning`. Tutorial stays reachable any time by keyword.

### Step 1 — Ingest before choosing a lane

Detect input: file path, pasted text, or conversation/matter description. Load `shared/setup-check.md` (session-cached).

**Multi-file scope gate** (2+ files) ⛔: mandatory hard stop unless user already stated scope. Present as structured choice, or numbered plain-text list if host has no choice tool, then STOP, wait for reply. Options: **One combined diagram** / **One per document**. Never infer scope from wording. Store `diagram_scope`. Single file, or scope user explicitly stated → skip.

Run Pass 1 only (deterministic manifest, no LLM): `workflows/extract.md` Steps 0-2. Store the result as `manifest_cache` and pass it to the chosen lane so Pass 1 never re-runs. Matter-description-only input (no docs) has no Pass 1 counts; proceed without them.

### Step 2 — GATE A: build mode (after ingestion) ⛔ BLOCKING

GATE A = mandatory hard stop. ALWAYS fires unless user typed a literal `--direct` or `--guided` flag. Do not load a lane and do not generate any diagram until GATE A answered.

**Only a literal flag pre-answers.** Sole answer-carrier = exact token `--direct` or `--guided` in user's message. Present → state resolved mode in one line ("Build mode: direct (flag)") and load the lane. User's own recorded choice, not a model decision.

**Everything else → present the gate and STOP.** Detailed, specific, or named-diagram request ("comprehensive diagram of this exact case", "make an org chart") = a request, NOT a gate answer. Never infer build mode from wording. Lead with what Pass 1 found, plain language: "Found [N parties, M events, ...]. How should I build it?" (omit counts for no-docs input). Present as structured choice, or numbered plain-text list if host has no choice tool, then wait for reply. Options, fixed order:

- **Guided, step by step**
- **Direct, just make it**

Do not reorder options, do not mark one implied from wording. Order fixed; choice is user's.

On choice: load `workflows/direct.md` or `workflows/guided.md`, passing `manifest_cache`, `input_source`, and `diagram_scope`. Both lanes share `workflows/generation.md` for the build; GATE B (HTML report) fires there.

**User-facing language (casual-friendly).** Never show Mermaid-internal type names to user. Use the plain-language names in `shared/diagram-type-map.md` § Plain-language names — "timeline", "org chart", "flowchart", "obligation checklist", and so on. Accept plain-word requests too ("make me an org chart") and map them through the same glossary. Legal vocabulary is fine; technical diagram vocabulary stays internal.

**Output language (EN/FR).** Gates, digest, elicitation, and rationale render in the user's prompt language (EN or FR; FR diagram names per the glossary's FR column). Extracted evidence and diagram labels stay verbatim source language, never translated. HTML export chrome follows via `render_html.py --ui-lang en|fr`.

## Scripts

All script commands run from the skill root (the folder containing this `SKILL.md`). Resolve the skill root once, then invoke scripts as `python scripts/<name>.py`.

| Script                        | Role                                                                                    |
| ----------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `scripts/check_setup.py`      | Dependency check → `{ok, missing[], installed[], optional{}}`                           |
| `scripts/first_run.py`        | First-run state → `{state}` (`returning`/`first_run`/`unknown`); `--mark` consumes flag |
| `scripts/extract_entities.py` | Orchestrator: normalize → detect → manifest JSON                                        |
| `scripts/diagram_selector.py` | Enriched extraction + intent → recommended type                                         |
| `scripts/patch_gate.py`       | Pass 2 patch gate: validates and applies LLM JSON Patch → `{ok, findings[], enriched_extraction_result}` |
| `scripts/eval_pass2.py`       | Pass 2 eval grader: scores LLM patch against label expectations → `{ok, results[], score}` |
| `scripts/render_html.py`      | Mermaid + FigureDescription → standalone HTML                                           |

`scripts/normalize/` (format adapters) and `scripts/extraction/` (candidate harvesters, resolver, and materializer) are libraries used by the orchestrator. Install deps once: `pip install -r requirements.txt -c constraints.txt` for release-verified versions, or omit `-c constraints.txt` for broad compatibility testing.

## Workflow loading map

| Intent/Need                                                  | File                       |
| ------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------- |
| First-run walkthrough + setup gate                           | `workflows/tutorial.md`    |
| Interactive default lane (digest/elicit → menu)              | `workflows/guided.md`      |
| Power-user lane (read all signals, hard cap 1)               | `workflows/direct.md`      |
| Shared generation core (select → guard → generate → deliver) | `workflows/generation.md`  |
| Two-pass extraction (called by both lanes)                   | `workflows/extract.md`     |
| Pass 2 quality eval (execute enrichment, grade against labels) | `workflows/eval-pass2.md`  |
| No-docs intake sets + delivery pattern                       | `shared/elicitation.md`    |
| Standalone HTML figure export                                | `workflows/html-export.md` |

## Reference loading map

| Intent/Need                                                       | File                                  |
| ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- |
| Dependency-check procedure                                        | `shared/setup-check.md`               |
| Per-type guards, entity normalization, parser bugs                | `shared/parser-guards.md`             |
| FigureDescription fields, captions, legends, risk rubric, caveats | `shared/figure-description-schema.md` |
| 30 legal categories → Mermaid type                                | `shared/diagram-type-map.md`          |
| Semantic node categories, palette, CSS class naming               | `shared/node-styles.md`               |
| Field catalogue + detection tiers + signals                       | `references/extraction-schema.md`     |

## Output

Output is CLI display only: the fenced Mermaid block renders as an artifact in the Claude web app and as syntax-highlighted code in the CLI. No note file is written. After the block, GATE B offers an HTML report as a selectable choice; the export escapes matter text, runs Mermaid in strict mode, uses vendored Mermaid when present, and loads the pinned CDN fallback only when explicitly enabled. Full output rules: `workflows/generation.md` § Step 5.

## Boundaries

Mermaid is for thinking, planning, explaining, and generating structure. It is not legal advice, not a court-ready exhibit, and not a substitute for legal writing. Every diagram carries a caveat line. Confidential material stays in tools approved for that matter.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.