Skip to content
Back to skills

Co Draft Motion Codearranger

ASecurity

This skill should be used to scaffold a Colorado civil motion with its supporting memorandum. Triggers include "draft a motion in Colorado", "draft a Colorado motion to compel", "draft a C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss", "Colorado motion for summary judgment", "draft a motion under C.R.C.P. 60(b)", "draft a Colorado motion in limine", "draft a C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15 motion". Produces a motion plus supporting memorandum in the Colorado statewide format applying the pro-se drafting framework (...

  • 85 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 8, 2026
ai-agentsgogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 8, 2026

npx -y skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill co-draft-motion-codearranger --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Co Draft Motion Codearranger?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Co Draft Motion Codearranger
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/thomasmoreai-co-draft-motion-codearranger/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thomasmoreai-co-draft-motion-codearranger)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
---
name: co-draft-motion-codearranger
title: Draft a Colorado Motion
description: This skill should be used to scaffold a Colorado civil motion with its supporting memorandum. Triggers include "draft a motion in Colorado", "draft a Colorado motion to compel", "draft a C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss", "Colorado motion for summary judgment", "draft a motion under C.R.C.P. 60(b)", "draft a Colorado motion in limine", "draft a C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15 motion". Produces a motion plus supporting memorandum in the Colorado statewide format applying the pro-se drafting framework (clear relief, cite the rule or statute, state supporting facts, conclude with signature and required certificates). Composes with `co-statewide-format` for format, `co-draft-declaration` for sworn facts, `co-draft-order` for the proposed order, and the relevant court overlay.
author: codearranger
author_url: https://github.com/codearranger/claude-legal/tree/main/plugins/co-court-docs/skills/co-draft-motion
license: MIT
version: 0.1.0
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: us
practice: litigation
language: en
---

# Draft a Colorado Motion

> **NOT LEGAL ADVICE.** This skill scaffolds a draft motion. The
> filer is responsible for verifying the underlying law and the
> rule's applicability to the facts of the case.

Use this skill to produce a motion + supporting memorandum in
Colorado format. Most Colorado motions follow C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15
(motion practice generally) plus the rule under which the motion is
filed (12(b)(5), 56, 60(b), 37(a), etc.).

## Page limits — C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15(1)(a)

| Document | Limit |
|----------|-------|
| Motion / response | 15 pages |
| Reply | 10 pages |

Excess pages require **leave of court**, sought by separate motion.
Many divisions require a **chambers copy** for motions exceeding 20-25
pages — check the assigned judge's practice standards.

## Standard motion structure

```
                    [Caption — see co-statewide-format]

           [DOCUMENT TITLE IN ALL CAPS, e.g.,
       DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5)]

[Movant], [Plaintiff / Defendant], by and through [counsel /
self-represented], respectfully moves the Court for [specific
relief], and in support states:

                       I. INTRODUCTION

[1-2 paragraph summary of the case, the relief sought, and the
reasons in headline form]

                  II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

[Numbered factual paragraphs. Each material fact gets its own
paragraph, with a citation to the record — declaration ¶ X,
Complaint ¶ X, Exhibit X, or admission in pleadings.]

                       III. ARGUMENT

A. [Headline of first argument]

[Argument body. Lead with the rule or statute citation; state the
controlling standard; apply to the facts; cite the controlling case
authority.]

B. [Headline of second argument]

[...]

                       IV. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, [Movant] respectfully requests that the
Court [grant the motion / grant the relief sought] and [enter the
attached Proposed Order].

                  CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL
                  (C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15(8))

Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15(8), the undersigned conferred with
[opposing counsel / opposing party] on [date] regarding the relief
requested in this Motion. [Opposing counsel] [opposes / does not
oppose / takes no position on] this Motion.

[OR for dispositive motions — exempt:]
Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15(8)(b), conferral is not required for
motions under C.R.C.P. 12(b) and C.R.C.P. 56.

Respectfully submitted this ___ day of __________, 20__.

                                        [Signature block]
                                        [Reg. No. if attorney /
                                         "Self-Represented" if pro se]

                   CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
[Date], method, recipients — per co-statewide-format]
```

## Filing checklist

When the motion is finalized:

- [ ] Caption matches the assigned court, division, courtroom
- [ ] Title in ALL CAPS centered between caption and body
- [ ] All cited rules and statutes correct (run `co-fact-check`)
- [ ] Affirmative defenses and counter-arguments addressed
- [ ] Within page limit (15 pages for motion / response)
- [ ] Certificate of Conferral included (or exempt-citation invoked)
- [ ] Proposed Order drafted as **separate** document (see
      `co-draft-order`)
- [ ] Supporting Declaration(s) drafted (see `co-draft-declaration`)
- [ ] Certificate of Service complete
- [ ] Format check passes (`scripts/format-check.py`)

## Common motion types

| Motion | Rule | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Motion to Dismiss | C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5) | Plausibility standard under *Warne v. Hall*, 2016 CO 50; no conferral required |
| Motion for Summary Judgment | C.R.C.P. 56 | Must be filed >= 91 days before trial; affidavits showing no genuine issue of material fact |
| Motion to Compel | C.R.C.P. 37(a) | Conferral required (C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15(8)); attach the deficient responses |
| Motion to Set Aside Default | C.R.C.P. 55(c) / 60(b) | Within 182 days for 60(b)(1)-(3); show good cause + meritorious defense |
| Motion for Reconsideration | C.R.C.P. 59 | Within 14 days of judgment |
| Motion in Limine | (inherent) | Pre-trial; addresses anticipated evidentiary disputes |
| Motion for Protective Order | C.R.C.P. 26(c) | Discovery-shielding |
| Motion for Extension of Time | C.R.C.P. 6(b) | Conferral required; typically routine |

## Argument structure — the Parker approach

Pro se filers should follow the **pro-se drafting framework**:

1. **State the relief clearly** in the opening sentence
2. **Cite the rule or statute** that grants the court power to award
   that relief
3. **State the facts** that satisfy each element of the standard
4. **Apply the controlling case law** to those facts
5. **Conclude** with the specific order sought

A motion that hides the relief, buries the rule citation, or omits a
clear element-by-element factual showing is the kind of filing the
court will struggle to engage with — Parker requires liberal
construction, but the court will not draft the argument for you.

## Composition

- For format: `co-statewide-format`
- For the supporting declaration: `co-draft-declaration`
- For the proposed order: `co-draft-order`
- For setting the hearing: `co-schedule-hearing`, `co-draft-note`
- For the court overlay: `co-denver`, `co-arapahoe`,
  `co-county-courts`
- For pre-filing QC: `co-quality-check`, `co-fact-check`
- For deadline math: `co-deadlines`

## References

- `references/motion-template.md` — annotated template
- `references/121-1-15-motion-practice.md` — full text of the rule
- `references/argument-structure.md` — pro-se drafting framework applied

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.