Skip to content
Back to skills

Claude For Legal

ASecurity

Legal workflow drafting, triage, review, research planning, legal operations, law-student or clinic support, and legal AI governance adapted from Anthropic claude-for-legal. Use for commercial, privacy, product, corporate, employment, regulatory, AI governance, IP, litigation, legal-clinic, and law-student tasks. Draft-only; attorney review and current source verification required.

  • 16 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added June 8, 2026
ai-agentsgogit

Works with

  • cli
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 8, 2026

npx -y skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill claude-for-legal --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Claude For Legal?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Claude For Legal
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/thomasmoreai-claude-for-legal/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thomasmoreai-claude-for-legal)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: claude-for-legal
title: Claude for Legal
description: Legal workflow drafting, triage, review, research planning, legal operations, law-student or clinic support, and legal AI governance adapted from Anthropic claude-for-legal. Use for commercial, privacy, product, corporate, employment, regulatory, AI governance, IP, litigation, legal-clinic, and law-student tasks. Draft-only; attorney review and current source verification required.
author: dmae97
author_url: https://github.com/dmae97/oh-my-kimi/tree/main/templates/skills/agents/claude-for-legal
license: MIT
version: 0.1.0
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: general
practice: general
language: en
---

# Claude for Legal

Use this skill when the user asks for legal workflow help: contract review, legal triage, policy/regulatory analysis, legal research planning, compliance checklists, litigation support, legal ops trackers, law-student practice, or clinic-style intake/drafting.

Source basis: Anthropic `claude-for-legal` at `anthropics/claude-for-legal` commit `9cecd91b0f26f732d18315afc3c9bb5ff99e0fbb`, Apache-2.0. This OMK skill is a compact adaptation, not a vendored copy of upstream prompts.

## Non-negotiables

- Treat outputs as AI-assisted drafts for qualified attorney review, not legal advice or legal conclusions.
- Do not file, send, sign, threaten, accept, reject, waive rights, or communicate externally without an explicit user gate and attorney-review note.
- Identify jurisdiction, governing law, audience, role of the user, deadline, and source set. If unknown and material, ask; if proceeding, state assumptions.
- For current law, citations, statutes, regulations, court rules, agency guidance, or case law, verify with authoritative/current sources before relying. If not verified, label citations and conclusions as needing verification.
- Never invent citations, docket facts, quotes, party facts, deadlines, or regulatory text.
- Preserve privilege/confidentiality boundaries; avoid putting sensitive facts into external tools unless user has configured and approved them.
- If user is not a lawyer, structure output as an attorney-facing brief with plain-English risk explanations and clear questions for counsel.

## Core workflow

1. **Classify lane**: choose practice area and workflow. Load `references/workflow-catalog.md` when mapping is not obvious.
2. **Intake**: collect only missing material facts: role, jurisdiction, document/source corpus, transaction/matter context, risk appetite, deadline, intended audience, and requested output.
3. **Source preflight**: record what sources were actually checked. Prefer official/primary sources; use legal research connectors/MCPs only if configured. Otherwise browse authoritative sources or mark `[verify]`.
4. **Analyze conservatively**: separate facts, assumptions, legal issues, risk level, source-backed points, open questions, and attorney decisions.
5. **Gate consequential action**: give draft language/checklist/memo, then list what must be reviewed before use.

## Default output skeleton

```md
# AI-assisted legal workflow draft — attorney review required

- Role/audience:
- Jurisdiction/governing law:
- Scope:
- Sources checked:
- Verification gaps:
- Assumptions:

## Executive summary
## Key issues / risk flags
## Analysis
## Draft / checklist / table
## Open questions for counsel
## Pre-use review gate
```

## Risk language

Use cautious labels: `Blocking`, `High`, `Medium`, `Low`, `Information needed`. Explain each label in business/plain-English terms. Avoid saying a position is “legal,” “compliant,” “privileged,” or “safe” unless verified and still framed for attorney judgment.

## Citation rules

- Attach source/provenance to every legal authority or factual extraction from documents.
- Distinguish primary authority, secondary source, model reasoning, and user-provided facts.
- If a citation comes from model knowledge or an unverified web result, tag it `[verify]` and place it in verification gaps.
- Quote only short excerpts needed for analysis; prefer paraphrase and pinpoint citations.

## Practice profile pattern

When a matter will continue across turns, create or update a concise practice/matter profile in the working docs, not in global memory unless explicitly asked. Include: client/company context, role, jurisdiction footprint, escalation contacts, risk posture, house style, source locations, and current open questions. Do not store secrets.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…