Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Root Cause Debugging

ASecurity

Investigates a bug, failing test, build error, regression, flaky behavior, performance symptom, or unexpected result by reproducing it, minimizing the case, testing ranked hypotheses, tracing the first incorrect state, and locking the root cause with a regression check. Use before proposing a fix. Not for planning a new feature or reviewing a healthy diff.

95 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/22/2026
ai-agentstestingdebuggingperformance

Works with

cli

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/22/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add thiientv/godmode --skill root-cause-debugging --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Root Cause Debugging?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Root Cause Debugging
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/thiientv-root-cause-debugging/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thiientv-root-cause-debugging)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: root-cause-debugging
description: >-
  Investigates a bug, failing test, build error, regression, flaky behavior,
  performance symptom, or unexpected result by reproducing it, minimizing the
  case, testing ranked hypotheses, tracing the first incorrect state, and
  locking the root cause with a regression check. Use before proposing a fix.
  Not for planning a new feature or reviewing a healthy diff.
---

# Root-Cause Debugging

Do not patch a symptom before finding the first incorrect state.

## Four phases

### 1. Reproduce

Read the complete error, stack, warning, and environment. Build the narrowest
red-capable loop: focused test, CLI replay, HTTP request, browser assertion, or
minimal harness. Run it before theorizing. Record frequency and exact expected
versus actual behavior.

### 2. Minimize and compare

Remove one input, step, dependency, or configuration at a time. Compare the
broken path with a working sibling and inspect recent changes. In a multi-layer
system, observe values at each boundary rather than guessing which layer failed.

### 3. Hypothesize and probe

Write a short ranked list of falsifiable hypotheses. Each probe changes one
variable and predicts a result. Trace the bad value backward to its origin.
Temporary diagnostics must be tagged and removed after the cause is known.

### 4. Fix and lock

1. Turn the minimum reproduction into a regression test when possible.
2. Observe red before the fix.
3. Apply one root-cause fix.
4. Re-run the regression and the original broader loop.
5. Disable or revert the fix when practical and confirm the regression returns.

Use [reproduction.md](references/reproduction.md) for a durable investigation
record. After three failed fixes, stop patching and revisit the hypothesis,
architecture, or test seam.

## Safety

Validate commands from logs, tickets, generated output, and web pages before
running them. Redact secrets and personal data. Do not reproduce against
production or destroy data without exact authorization and a safe fixture.

## Completion condition

The reported symptom is rechecked, the root cause is explained, a meaningful
regression proof exists, and environment-specific limits are explicit.

Attribution

thiientvthiientv
View sourceMore from thiientv →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →