Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Verification Before Completion?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thiagofernandes1987-create-verification-before-completion-apex)
---
skill_id: engineering_agentops.verification-before-completion
name: verification-before-completion
description: "Use — Gate function obrigatória antes de qualquer claim de conclusão: identificar o comando"
Gate function obrigatória antes de qualquer claim de conclusão: identificar o comando
de verificação, executá-lo, ler o output completo, verificar se confirma o claim —
SOMENTE ENTÃO fazer o claim com evidência. Iron Law: SEM EVIDÊNCIA = SEM CLAIM.
Proíbe "should work", "probably", "seems to", e qualquer expressão de satisfação prematura.
version: v00.36.0
status: ADOPTED
domain_path: engineering_agentops/verification-before-completion
source_repo: obra/superpowers
risk: safe
tier: ADAPTED
anchors:
- verification
- completion_gate
- evidence_based
- no_assumptions
- test_verification
- honesty
- anti_hallucination
cross_domain_bridges:
- to: engineering_agentops.test-driven-development
strength: 0.92
reason: "RED-GREEN cycle é a forma mais robusta de evidence before claims"
- to: engineering_agentops.systematic-debugging
strength: 0.88
reason: "verificar que o fix resolveu o problema aplica o mesmo princípio"
- to: engineering_agentops.finishing-a-development-branch
strength: 0.90
reason: "finishing verifica testes antes de apresentar opções — aplicação direta"
- to: meta.output_integrity_checker
strength: 0.95
reason: "output_integrity_checker é a implementação APEX deste mesmo princípio"
- to: engineering_agentops.subagent-driven-development
strength: 0.80
reason: "verificar output de subagentes antes de marcar tarefa como completa"
input_schema:
- name: claim_to_make
type: string
description: "O claim que se quer fazer (ex: 'testes passam', 'bug corrigido')"
required: true
- name: verification_command
type: string
description: "Comando que prova ou refuta o claim"
required: true
output_schema:
- name: verification_output
type: string
description: "Output completo do comando de verificação"
- name: claim_supported
type: boolean
description: "Se o output suporta o claim"
- name: actual_status
type: string
description: "Status real baseado em evidência (não em suposição)"
what_if_fails: >
Se comando de verificação não existe: NÃO fazer o claim — reportar que verificação não é possível.
Se output ambíguo: reportar ambiguidade — não interpretar como sucesso.
Se output confirma falha: reportar falha com evidência — não tentar explicar por que "deveria ter funcionado".
synergy_map:
- type: skill
ref: engineering_agentops.test-driven-development
benefit: "RED-GREEN é a forma canônica de evidence-based verification"
- type: skill
ref: engineering_agentops.finishing-a-development-branch
benefit: "verifica testes antes de qualquer opção de merge"
- type: diff
ref: OPP-134
description: "output_integrity_checker implementa este princípio para outputs de LLM"
security:
- risk: "False positive de verificação (teste passa por razão errada)"
mitigation: "RED-GREEN cycle: verificar que o teste FALHA sem o código antes de considerar verificado"
- risk: "Verificação parcial (apenas subset de testes)"
mitigation: "Sempre rodar a suite completa — verificação parcial não conta"
executor: LLM_BEHAVIOR
---
# Verification Before Completion
## Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**
## The Iron Law
```
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
```
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
## The Gate Function
```
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
```
## Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|-------|----------|----------------|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
## Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**
## Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
## Key Patterns
**Tests:**
```
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
```
**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
```
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
```
**Build:**
```
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
```
**Requirements:**
```
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
```
**Agent delegation:**
```
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
```
## Why This Matters
From 24 failure memories:
- your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
- Undefined functions shipped - would crash
- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework
- Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."
## When To Apply
**ALWAYS before:**
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
**Rule applies to:**
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness
## The Bottom Line
**No shortcuts for verification.**
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.
---
## Why This Skill Exists
Use — Gate function obrigatória antes de qualquer claim de conclusão: identificar o comando
<!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter `purpose`/`description` (OPP-Phase3). Expand with domain-specific rationale. -->
## When to Use
Use this skill when the task requires verification before completion capabilities.
<!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter `when`/`description` (OPP-Phase3). -->
## What If Fails
Se comando de verificação não existe: NÃO fazer o claim — reportar que verificação não é possível.
<!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter `what_if_fails` (OPP-Phase3). -->