Skip to content
Back to skills

Pydanticai

ASecurity

Build type-safe AI agents and graph-based workflows with PydanticAI and PydanticGraph. Agent creation, function tools, capabilities, dependency injection, structured output, streaming, multi-agent patterns, testing, evals, and graph state machines. Use whenever you are building agents, tool-using LLM workflows, or graph-based state machines in Python.

  • 36 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 10, 2026
ai-agentspythongobashsqlnodefastapitestingapibackend

Works with

  • cli
  • api
  • mcp

Security analysis

A96/100
  • mediumInstalls packages at runtime which could introduce malicious dependencies

Pro scans all 11 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 10, 2026

npx -y skills add theheavenlyd3mon/hermes-profiles --skill pydanticai --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pydanticai?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pydanticai
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/theheavenlyd3mon-pydanticai/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/theheavenlyd3mon-pydanticai)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: pydanticai
description: >-
  Build type-safe AI agents and graph-based workflows with PydanticAI and
  PydanticGraph. Agent creation, function tools, capabilities, dependency
  injection, structured output, streaming, multi-agent patterns, testing,
  evals, and graph state machines. Use whenever you are building agents,
  tool-using LLM workflows, or graph-based state machines in Python.
license: MIT
metadata:
  source: https://pydantic.dev/docs/ai/overview/
  version: "1.0.4"
compatibility: Python 3.10+; requires pydantic-ai or pydantic-ai-slim package
---

# PydanticAI & PydanticGraph Expert Skill

PydanticAI is a Python agent framework for building production-grade GenAI applications, built by the team behind Pydantic. PydanticGraph is its companion graph/state-machine library.

**Install:**
```bash
pip install pydantic-ai               # Full install (all providers)
pip install "pydantic-ai-slim[openai]" # Minimal install + your provider
```

## Quick Reference

```python
from pydantic_ai import Agent

# Basic agent — one line
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-5.2', instructions='Be concise.')

# Run it
result = agent.run_sync('What is the capital of France?')
print(result.output)
```

## When to Load Which Reference

| Topic | Load When | File |
|---|---|---|
| **Agent creation & lifecycle** | You need to create, configure, or run an agent — define tools, deps, output types, run methods, streaming | `references/core-agents.md` |
| **Capabilities & hooks** | You need built-in capabilities (Thinking, WebSearch, MCP, etc.), on-demand loading, lifecycle hooks, or custom capabilities | `references/capabilities-hooks.md` |
| **PydanticGraph** | You need a state machine, graph-based control flow, parallel execution, BaseNode subclasses, or GraphBuilder with joins/decisions | `references/graph.md` |
| **Models, output & streaming** | You need multi-model setups, FallbackModel, streaming output, output functions, or structured output with validation | `references/models-output.md` |
| **Multi-agent patterns & integrations** | You need agent delegation, programmatic hand-off, MCP servers, durable execution, or UI adapters | `references/patterns.md` |
| **Testing & evaluation** | You need TestModel, FunctionModel, pytest patterns, overrides, or Pydantic Evals for systematic eval | `references/testing-evals.md` |
| **Full worked examples** | You want complete runnable examples — bank support agent, email feedback graph, multi-agent flight booking | `references/examples.md` |
| **Framework boundaries** | You need to compare PydanticAI vs LangGraph for a project, or want to combine them | `references/hybrid-pydanticai-langgraph.md` — also load `skill_view(name='langgraph')` |
| **API surface reference** | You need to find the right import path, class name, or method signature quickly | `references/api-reference.md` |

## Common Patterns at a Glance

### Agent with tools and structured output
```python
from pydantic import BaseModel
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext

class WeatherResult(BaseModel):
    temperature: float
    conditions: str

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-5.2', output_type=WeatherResult)

@agent.tool
async def get_weather(ctx: RunContext, city: str) -> str:
    """Get current weather for a city."""
    return f"24°C and sunny in {city}"

result = agent.run_sync('Weather in London?')
print(result.output.temperature)
```
→ See `references/core-agents.md` for full agent lifecycle, run methods, and tool patterns.

### Agent with dependency injection
```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext

@dataclass
class MyDeps:
    api_key: str
    db_conn: str

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-5.2', deps_type=MyDeps)

@agent.tool
async def query_db(ctx: RunContext[MyDeps], sql: str) -> str:
    return f"Query results using {ctx.deps.db_conn}"
```
→ See `references/core-agents.md` for dependency injection patterns and testing overrides.

### Graph with multiple nodes
```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
from pydantic_graph import BaseNode, End, GraphRunContext, GraphBuilder

@dataclass
class MyState:
    value: int = 0

@dataclass
class ProcessNode(BaseNode[MyState]):
    async def run(self, ctx: GraphRunContext[MyState]) -> End | NextNode:
        ctx.state.value += 1
        if ctx.state.value >= 5:
            return End(ctx.state.value)
        return NextNode()
```
→ See `references/graph.md` for both BaseNode and GraphBuilder APIs, parallel execution, and join/reducer patterns.

### When to use which run method

| When you need… | Use | Key behavior |
|---|---|---|
| A single answer, sync code | `run_sync()` | Blocks until complete, returns `RunResult` |
| A single answer, async code | `run()` | Async, returns `RunResult` |
| Stream text as it's generated | `run_stream()` | Async context manager, yields `stream_text()` / `stream_output()` |
| See granular events (tool calls, part starts, deltas) | `run_stream_events()` | Yields `AgentStreamEvent` types — `FunctionToolCallEvent`, `PartStartEvent`, `FinalResultEvent` |
| Manual control over each graph step | `iter()` | Iterate over agent's internal graph nodes (`UserPromptNode` → `ModelRequestNode` → `CallToolsNode`) |
| Tool calls to execute during streaming | `run_stream_events()` or `run(event_stream_handler=...)` | `run_stream()` stops at the first output that matches `output_type` and does NOT execute subsequent tool calls |

*Details for each run method in `references/core-agents.md`.*

### Graph API: BaseNode vs GraphBuilder

| Factor | BaseNode (class-based) | GraphBuilder (function-based) |
|---|---|---|
| Style | Subclass `BaseNode[StateT]`, implement `async run()` | Decorate async functions with `@g.step` |
| State mutation | Via `ctx.state` inside `run()` method | Via `ctx.state` inside step function |
| Parallelism | Manual fork/join logic | Built-in `.map()` per-element fan-out and `.broadcast()` same-input-to-multiple |
| Joins / aggregation | Manual aggregation in return types | Built-in reducers: `reduce_list_append`, `reduce_sum`, `reduce_dict_update`, etc. |
| Edge declaration | Inferred from `run()` return type annotation | Explicit via `g.edge_from(source).to(target)` |
| When to use | Complex node logic, OO patterns, conditional edge logic | Simple linear flows, parallel data processing, concise syntax |

*Both APIs in `references/graph.md`.*

### Framework boundaries: PydanticAI vs LangGraph

Both frameworks build agentic systems with graphs and tools, but they differ sharply in design philosophy. The right choice depends on what you're optimizing for.

| Factor | PydanticAI + PydanticGraph | LangGraph | Using both together |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design philosophy | Type-safe, data-schema-driven. Feels like FastAPI. | Low-level graph primitives (Pregel/Beam inspired). Feels like NetworkX. | PydanticAI for the agent layer; LangGraph for complex orchestration |
| Agent definition | `Agent(model, tools, deps, output_type)` — declarative, one line | Manual `StateGraph` nodes with message-passing | PydanticAI `Agent` as a node function inside LangGraph `StateGraph` |
| Tool calling | `@agent.tool` decorator, auto-schema from type hints, `RunContext` DI | Manual tool registration, `tool_node = ToolNode(tools)` | PydanticAI's typed tool definitions used within LangGraph nodes |
| State management | `GraphRunContext.state` — mutable dataclass, in-memory | `State` with typed reducers, checkpointers (SQLite/Postgres) | LangGraph checkpointer for the outer flow; PydanticGraph for sub-graph state |
| Multi-agent patterns | Agent delegation (tool-call), programmatic hand-off, graph-based | Supervisor (central router), swarm (direct handoff), hierarchical (subgraphs) | PydanticAI delegation within a LangGraph supervisor node |
| Persistence | Durable execution via Temporal, Inngest, Prefect, DBOS | Built-in checkpointers (MemorySaver, SqliteSaver, PostgresSaver) | LangGraph checkpointer at graph level |
| Streaming | 5 methods: run, run_sync, run_stream, run_stream_events, iter | `.stream()` / `.astream_events()` on compiled graph | LangGraph `.astream_events()` wrapping PydanticAI event handlers |
| Learning curve | Lower — type hints guide everything | Higher — more manual wiring | Highest — two mental models |
| Best for | Single agents, tool-using workflows, type-safe structured output, teams new to agents | Complex state machines, multi-agent with branching/cycles, HITL, existing LangChain users | Large systems needing type-safe agents AND sophisticated orchestration |

**Boundary conditions — consider LangGraph when:**
- You need built-in checkpointing/persistence for long-running conversations (SQLite, Postgres backends built-in)
- Your multi-agent system needs subgraph composition with isolated state namespaces
- You need human-in-the-loop patterns (interrupt/resume, state editing, approval workflows)
- You're already using LangChain and want consistency
- Your graph needs cycles or dynamic fan-out via `Send()`

**Consider PydanticAI when:**
- Type safety and IDE autocomplete are priorities
- You want declarative agents with minimal boilerplate
- You need structured output with automatic validation and retries
- Your multi-agent needs are simple delegation or sequential hand-off
- You value the composable capabilities system (Thinking, WebSearch, MCP as plugins)

**Consider using both when:**
- You need LangGraph's orchestration (checkpointing, subgraphs, HITL) for the outer loop, but want PydanticAI's type-safe agent definition and tool schema for the inner agent logic
- You have a mixed team: some agents benefit from PydanticAI's typing, others need LangGraph's low-level control
- See `references/hybrid-pydanticai-langgraph.md` for a complete worked example.

*LangGraph skill:* `skill_view(name='langgraph')` — covers supervisor/swarm/hierarchical patterns, persistence, production deployment, and evals.

### Error handling quick-pick

```python
from pydantic_ai import UnexpectedModelBehavior, capture_run_messages

with capture_run_messages() as messages:
    try:
        result = agent.run_sync('Query')
    except UnexpectedModelBehavior as e:
        cause = e.__cause__  # Often ModelRetry('reason')
        print(f"Root cause: {cause}")
        print("Full conversation:", messages)  # Inspect every message
        # Common recovery: raise ModelRetry from tools with clear instructions
```

| Exception | Meaning | Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| `UnexpectedModelBehavior` | Retry limit exceeded or model gave unexpected response | Inspect `e.__cause__`, check messages, adjust instructions or tool retries |
| `ModelRetry` (raised from tools) | Tool wants model to retry with different args | Let it propagate — PydanticAI handles it automatically up to `retries` limit |
| `ModelAPIError` | Provider returned 4xx/5xx | Check API key, rate limits, model availability |
| `UsageLimitExceeded` | Token/request budget exhausted | Increase `UsageLimits` or optimize prompt |
| `HookTimeoutError` | A lifecycle hook timed out | Increase hook timeout or optimize hook logic |

## Key CLI Commands

```bash
pip install pydantic-ai                    # Everything
pip install "pydantic-ai-slim[openai]"      # Minimal
pip install "pydantic-ai-slim[openai,google,anthropic]"  # Multi-provider
```

## Directory Structure

```
pydanticai/
├── SKILL.md
├── references/
│   ├── core-agents.md         # Agent lifecycle, tools, deps, output
│   ├── capabilities-hooks.md  # Capabilities system & lifecycle hooks
│   ├── graph.md               # PydanticGraph (BaseNode + GraphBuilder)
│   ├── models-output.md       # Models, streaming, structured output
│   ├── patterns.md            # Multi-agent patterns & integrations
│   ├── testing-evals.md       # Testing & evaluation framework
│   ├── examples.md            # Complete worked examples
│   ├── hybrid-pydanticai-langgraph.md  # PydanticAI as LangGraph node (hybrid pattern)
│   └── api-reference.md       # Quick API surface reference
```

## Gotchas

- **Output type = final only:** The `output_type` constrains the *final* response. The model can still call tools (function tools) mid-run. Output functions are different — they're forced to be called and end the run.
- **pydantic-graph has zero dependency on pydantic-ai:** It's a standalone library. You can use it for non-GenAI state machines. Install with `pip install pydantic-graph`.
- **`pydantic-ai-slim` vs `pydantic-ai`:** The slim package ships only core deps + OpenTelemetry. The full `pydantic-ai` is a meta-package that adds openai, anthropic, google, cli, mcp, evals, web, retries, and logfire extras.
- **Tool calls during streaming by default DON'T execute:** `run_stream()` stops at the first output that matches the output type. Use `run_stream_events()` or `run()` with `event_stream_handler` to keep tool calls executing.
- **System prompt ≠ instructions:** System prompts are part of message history and round-trip. Instructions are server-side and don't appear in messages sent to clients. When reusing `message_history`, the agent's new system prompt won't automatically be sent unless you add `ReinjectSystemPrompt`.
- **`conversation_id` is manual for forking:** Pass `conversation_id='new'` to start a fresh conversation chain from existing history. It's not automatic.
- **Models named `provider:model_name`** — PydanticAI auto-resolves the model class from the string prefix. For custom endpoints, use `OpenAIChatModel(model_name, provider=OpenAIProvider(base_url=...))`.
- **`TestModel` can't emulate native tools:** Override with `agent.override(model=TestModel(), native_tools=[])` in tests if your agent uses WebSearch, etc.
- **`defer_model_check=True` for testable module-level agents:** When declaring an `Agent` at module level (outside a function) and using `TestModel` in tests with `agent.override(model=TestModel())`, set `defer_model_check=True` on the constructor. Without it, the agent tries to resolve the model string at import time — which fails without API credentials, even though the real model is overridden before any test runs.
- **Message history requires pairing:** When slicing history, tool calls and their returns must stay paired or the LLM will error.
- **`stream_text()` fails with BaseModel output types:** When `output_type` is a BaseModel (structured output), calling `result.stream_text()` raises `UserError('stream_text() can only be used with text responses')`. Use `result.stream_output()` instead to get partial validated objects as they stream in. If you need text-level streaming with structured output, use `run_stream_events()` and inspect `PartDeltaEvent` with `TextPartDelta` deltas. The two methods serve different output modes — text output → `stream_text()`, structured output → `stream_output()`.
- **`graph.run()` returns OutputT, NOT the state object:** Despite passing `state=MyState()` to `graph.run()`, the return value is the graph's `output_type` (e.g. `list[int]`), not the state. The `state` object IS mutated in-place during execution (since it's a mutable dataclass), so keep a separate reference:

  ```python
  state = MyState(items_processed=0)
  result = await graph.run(state=state, inputs=[1, 2, 3])
  # result -> [2, 4, 6]       (OutputT = list[int])
  # state.items_processed -> 3 (state mutated in-place)
  ```

  This trap is most common with parallel `.map()` patterns where the reader assumes `result.items_processed` will work. It won't. The `items_processed` count lives on the state object you passed in, not on the return value.

Files in this skill

  • README.md1.7 KB
  • SKILL.md15.3 KB
  • references/api-reference.md6.6 KB
  • references/capabilities-hooks.md10.6 KB
  • references/core-agents.md11.1 KB
  • references/examples.md10.8 KB
  • references/graph.md9.2 KB
  • references/hybrid-pydanticai-langgraph.md7.1 KB
  • references/models-output.md8.2 KB
  • references/patterns.md7.3 KB
  • references/testing-evals.md4.7 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.