Tech Seo Audit

---
name: tech-seo-audit
description: "Run technical SEO audit. Use when: checking Core Web Vitals, crawlability, indexation, speed, or structured data."
category: marketing-and-growth
source_repo: hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
source_path: "plugins/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/skills/tech-seo-audit/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/blob/HEAD/plugins/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/skills/tech-seo-audit/SKILL.md
---


# /digital-marketing-pro:tech-seo-audit

## Purpose

Run a comprehensive technical SEO audit that covers the infrastructure and code-level factors that affect search engine crawling, indexation, and ranking. This audit focuses on the technical foundation rather than content or backlinks. Produces a prioritized report with specific fixes, expected impact, and implementation guidance.

### Important — technical SEO during the May 2026 Core Update

> **Time-boxed guidance — valid until ~2026-08.** This block is specific to the May 2026 Core Update window. After ~August 2026 it is stale: re-check the [Google Search Status Dashboard](https://status.search.google.com/) for the current/most-recent core update and its dates before applying the timing advice below.

The Google **broad core update that started 21 May 2026** is primarily a quality/relevance reweighting, not a technical signal change. If a brand contacts you about ranking volatility in May/June 2026:

- **Run this audit anyway** — Core Updates frequently surface pre-existing technical debt because relative quality matters more during reweighting. Crawl-budget waste on low-quality pages, broken canonical chains, soft-404s, and orphaned JS-rendered routes all amplify Core Update damage.
- **Resist crawler/rendering "fixes" pitched as Core Update remedies.** No technical change will undo a Core Update hit if the underlying content quality issue isn't addressed. Pair this audit with `/digital-marketing-pro:seo-audit` (content/E-E-A-T side) — both are needed.
- **Hreflang, structured data, and Core Web Vitals carry their normal weight** — the update did not change technical priorities, only how much E-E-A-T deficits hurt.

## Input Required

The user must provide (or will be prompted for):

- **Website URL** (required): The domain or specific section to audit
- **CMS/Platform** (helpful): WordPress, Shopify, Next.js, custom, etc.
- **Known issues** (optional): Any specific technical concerns
- **Site size** (helpful): Approximate number of pages
- **International presence** (optional): Whether site serves multiple countries/languages
- **Access to Google Search Console data** (optional): Enables real data vs estimates

## Process

1. **Load brand context**: Read `~/.claude-marketing/brands/_active-brand.json` for the active slug, then load `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/profile.json`. Apply brand voice, compliance rules for target markets (`skills/context-engine/compliance-rules.md`), and industry context. **Also check for guidelines** at `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/guidelines/_manifest.json` — if present, load restrictions and relevant category files. Check for custom templates at `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/templates/`. Check for agency SOPs at `~/.claude-marketing/sops/`. If no brand exists, ask: "Set up a brand first (/digital-marketing-pro:brand-setup)?" — or proceed with defaults.
2. **Load reference files**: Read `skills/technical-seo/core-web-vitals.md`, `skills/technical-seo/crawlability.md`, `skills/technical-seo/site-architecture.md`, `skills/technical-seo/indexation.md`, and `skills/technical-seo/international-seo.md` for detailed technical SEO frameworks
3. **Run tech-seo-auditor script** (if Python available): `python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/tech-seo-auditor.py" --url {url}` to get automated checks on status codes, redirects, meta tags, and page structure
4. **Core Web Vitals assessment**: Evaluate LCP, INP, and CLS using known thresholds. If GSC MCP is connected, pull real CrUX data. Otherwise, provide optimization checklist based on CMS/platform
5. **Crawlability audit**: Check robots.txt configuration, XML sitemap presence and structure, crawl budget considerations, JavaScript rendering impact
6. **Indexation review**: Canonical tag usage, meta robots directives, duplicate content risks, index bloat potential, pagination handling
7. **Site architecture analysis**: URL structure, internal linking patterns, site depth, navigation efficiency, breadcrumbs
8. **Page speed optimization**: Image optimization, render-blocking resources, compression, caching, CDN usage
9. **Mobile-first compliance**: Viewport configuration, responsive design, mobile usability, touch targets
10. **Redirect health check**: Redirect chain detection, mixed HTTP/HTTPS, trailing slash consistency
11. **Structured data review**: Schema markup presence, validation, completeness, opportunity identification
12. **International SEO** (if applicable): Hreflang implementation, language targeting, URL structure
13. **Security check**: HTTPS enforcement, HSTS, mixed content
14. Compile prioritized report: Group findings by severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low), include specific fix instructions, estimated effort, and expected impact for each issue

## Output

A structured technical SEO audit report containing:

- **Audit header**: Brand name, URL, date, CMS/platform, overall health score (0-100)
- **Executive summary**: 3-5 sentence overview of technical health
- **Critical issues** (fix immediately): Issues blocking crawling, indexation, or causing significant ranking impact
- **High priority** (fix this week): Issues with measurable ranking or UX impact
- **Medium priority** (fix this month): Optimization opportunities with moderate impact
- **Low priority** (backlog): Minor improvements and best-practice alignment
- **Each finding includes**: Description, affected URLs/pages, specific fix with code/config examples, estimated effort (hours), expected impact (traffic/ranking)
- **Core Web Vitals scorecard**: LCP, INP, CLS with current estimates and target values
- **Quick wins list**: Top 5 highest-impact, lowest-effort fixes
- **Implementation roadmap**: Suggested timeline for addressing all findings

## Tips & caveats

- **Core Web Vitals from synthetic tests (Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights) often disagree with field data (CrUX, GSC).** Field data is what Google ranks against. If lab says PASS but field says FAIL, trust field.
- **JavaScript rendering is the #1 silent killer** of indexation on modern sites. Always check whether the rendered HTML (post-JS) matches the source HTML at critical content. Use `view-source:` vs DevTools.
- **Don't fix what isn't broken.** A site at 95th-percentile CWV doesn't need re-engineering — that effort is better spent on content. Tech-SEO is necessary, not sufficient.
- **Robots.txt + meta robots conflicts** are common. If both fire, Google obeys the most restrictive. Always cross-check.
- **For a Core Update window,** run this audit anyway — Core Updates often surface pre-existing tech debt, but the fixes are background work, not Core Update remedies.
- **Link-profile work is out of scope for this technical audit.** This audit covers own-domain *technical* health (crawlability, indexation, redirects, canonicals, CWV, schema) — not backlinks. For own-domain link health see `/digital-marketing-pro:seo-audit`; for competitor link-gap analysis hand off to `/digital-marketing-pro:backlink-gap`.

## Agents Used

- **seo-specialist** — Runs the technical audit across all dimensions, generates structured data recommendations, provides CMS-specific fix guidance, prioritizes findings by impact/effort

---

**Source:** [`hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins`](https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins) → `plugins/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro/skills/tech-seo-audit/SKILL.md`