Use when deciding which qe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Quantitative Economics (QE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add thedixitjain/the-mega-skill-library --skill qe-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Qe Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-qe-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: qe-workflow
description: "Use when deciding which qe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Quantitative Economics (QE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills."
category: general-purpose
source_repo: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
source_path: "Quantitative-Economics-Skills/skills/qe-workflow/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/Quantitative-Economics-Skills/skills/qe-workflow/SKILL.md
---
# QE Workflow Router (qe-workflow)
## Overview
This is the router. It tells you **which qe-* skill to use at the current stage** of a manuscript aimed at *Quantitative Economics* (QE) — the empirically and computationally oriented general-interest journal of the **Econometric Society**, the sister of *Econometrica* (more theoretical/methodological) and *Theoretical Economics* (pure theory). QE rewards papers that **develop or apply quantitative methods to substantive economic questions** — empirical, structural/computational, experimental, or simulation-based — with **documented data and reproducible code**.
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as QE. Operational tells that you are at QE and not a sibling or a generic top journal: **Econometric Society membership is required to submit** (at least one author a member); there is a **submission fee** (US$100 regular / US$50 student); the manuscript must be **posted publicly during review**; the **ES Data Editor** runs a pre-acceptance reproducibility check (DCAS-compatible, not the JAE archive); QE is **Open Access (CC BY-NC)** with a post-proof publication fee based on production cost per page. Wiley product metadata checked on 2026-06-20 lists **Bernard Salanié** as editor. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official ES and Wiley pages.
## When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?"
- A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed
- Work is ping-ponging between data/estimation, framing, writing, and the response letter
- A QE decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
## Routing table
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|-----------------|------------|
| Question feels narrow / not clearly general-interest quantitative | `qe-topic-selection` |
| Contribution vs. the frontier is fuzzy or undersold | `qe-literature-positioning` |
| The "so what" / one-sentence claim is not sharp | `qe-contribution-framing` |
| Empirical causal design or structural identification is shaky | `qe-identification-strategy` |
| Estimation, moments, or data handling need work | `qe-data-analysis` |
| Exhibits are dense; significance asterisks still present | `qe-tables-figures` |
| Prose buries the idea; abstract/intro do not land | `qe-writing-style` |
| Data/code deposit, README, or ES Data Editor prep | `qe-replication-and-data-policy` |
| Want to understand referee timeline / desk-reject odds / transfer | `qe-review-process` |
| Ready to submit via the ES portal; need a preflight | `qe-submission` |
| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy | `qe-rebuttal` |
## Default order
1. `qe-topic-selection` — lock the substantive quantitative question
2. `qe-literature-positioning` — stake the contribution vs. the frontier
3. `qe-contribution-framing` — sharpen the one-sentence claim
4. `qe-identification-strategy` — causal design or structural identification
5. `qe-data-analysis` — estimation, moments, diagnostics
6. `qe-tables-figures` — exhibits without significance asterisks
7. `qe-writing-style` — make the idea land (abstract + intro last)
8. `qe-replication-and-data-policy` — assemble the ES-compliant package
9. `qe-review-process` — calibrate expectations / consider Econometrica transfer
10. `qe-submission` — ES portal preflight
11. `qe-rebuttal` — after the R&R
> `qe-writing-style` is a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before identification/estimation settle.
## Anti-patterns
- Skipping `qe-replication-and-data-policy` until acceptance — the ES Data Editor checks **before** acceptance
- Letting `qe-tables-figures` polish exhibits while estimation is still moving
- Treating QE like Econometrica (method-first) or a generic fee-free top-5 journal
## Routing by paper archetype
QE spans four quantitative branches, and the bottleneck differs by branch. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.
| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |
|-----------|-------------------------|----------|
| structural / computational estimation | numerical validation + parameter identification | `qe-identification-strategy` → `qe-data-analysis` |
| applied micro / finance causal design | staggered-DID or weak-IV credibility | `qe-identification-strategy` |
| experiment (own data) | pre-registration + estimand (Jan 2026 rules) | `qe-topic-selection` → `qe-identification-strategy` |
| simulation / measurement | robustness to grids/tuning + reproducibility | `qe-data-analysis` → `qe-replication-and-data-policy` |
## Worked routing example (illustrative)
A user says: "My structural labor model estimates fine, but a referee called the counterfactual numerically fragile and the welfare gain not robust." That is two distinct QE pushbacks — *numerical accuracy not validated* and *results not robust to specification* — both owned by `qe-data-analysis`, with the identification defense in `qe-identification-strategy`. Route there first; only once the headline welfare number is stable (say it settles at 4.2%, s.e. 0.6, illustrative) do you return to `qe-tables-figures` and `qe-rebuttal` to present and defend it.
## Minimal decision snippet
```
if decision_letter_arrived: -> qe-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit: -> qe-submission
elif exhibits_or_significance: -> qe-tables-figures
elif estimation_or_numerics: -> qe-data-analysis
elif identification_shaky: -> qe-identification-strategy
elif claim_or_positioning_fuzzy: -> qe-contribution-framing / qe-literature-positioning
else: -> qe-topic-selection
```
---
**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Quantitative-Economics-Skills/skills/qe-workflow/SKILL.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!