Use when building tables and figures for a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and show survey-based uncertainty correctly. POQ word caps count text and notes but exclude figures and tables, so exhibits carry weight without costing the budget — but they must report design-based uncertainty and weighting. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add thedixitjain/the-mega-skill-library --skill poq-tables-figures --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Poq Tables Figures?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-poq-tables-figures)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: poq-tables-figures
description: "Use when building tables and figures for a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and show survey-based uncertainty correctly. POQ word caps count text and notes but exclude figures and tables, so exhibits carry weight without costing the budget — but they must report design-based uncertainty and weighting. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis."
category: business-and-finance
source_repo: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
source_path: "Public-Opinion-Quarterly-Skills/skills/poq-tables-figures/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/Public-Opinion-Quarterly-Skills/skills/poq-tables-figures/SKILL.md
---
# Tables & Figures (poq-tables-figures)
Exhibits are where an expert reviewer checks whether the survey result is real. At POQ the word caps
count **text and notes but exclude figures, tables, references, and appendices** — so exhibits do not
eat your budget, but they must be honest about **design-based uncertainty, weighting, and the base N**
behind every estimate.
## When to trigger
- Designing the main results table/figure or a key descriptive/trend exhibit
- Deciding what belongs in the article vs. an appendix
- A reviewer found an exhibit unclear, mislabeled, or missing its base/weighting note
- Presenting opinion trends, subgroup differences, or experimental treatment effects
## Principles
1. **Self-contained.** A reader should understand each exhibit from its title, labels, and note alone —
state the **base N (weighted/unweighted), the population, the question wording (or short form), the
mode, and the uncertainty measure** (CI / margin of error).
2. **Show survey uncertainty.** Report confidence intervals or margins of error from **design-based**
estimates; never plot a point estimate with no uncertainty. Note if estimates are weighted.
3. **Figures over dense tables for effects.** Trend lines with uncertainty bands, coefficient/forest
plots with design-based SEs, conjoint AMCE plots, predicted-probability plots communicate magnitude
and uncertainty better than a wall of coefficients.
4. **Accessible.** Colorblind-safe palettes; legible in grayscale; no chartjunk, no 3D. Reviewers must
parse it quickly.
5. **Reproducible.** Each exhibit is generated by the master script; numbers match the deposited
replication package exactly (POQ re-runs it — see `poq-transparency-and-data-policy`).
## POQ-specific exhibits
- Opinion **trend lines** with uncertainty bands; mark wording/mode breaks in the series.
- **Weighted vs. unweighted** overlays where weighting matters to the read.
- Conjoint AMCE plots; survey-experiment treatment-effect plots with design-based intervals.
- A **disclosure-friendly methods table** summarizing population, mode, dates, N, and response rate
(links to Appendix A — see `poq-survey-design-and-measurement`).
## Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
Generate exhibits from the fitted result, not by retyping numbers (the usual source of
body-vs-supplement drift). Full map: [`execution-with-mcp`](../../../shared-resources/empirical-methods/execution-with-mcp.md). Public Opinion Quarterly is survey methodology and public opinion; the chain serves causal/experimental claims, while survey-design and measurement contributions use their own standards (sampling, weighting, measurement error).
- **Tables:** `etable` (multi-model columns) or `did_summary_to_latex` straight from the
`result_id`.
- **Figures:** `plot_from_result` / `enhanced_event_study_plot` / `event_study_table` —
axis units and the SE/clustering note baked in.
- **Every note** names the estimator + clustering and states the effect size in
interpretable units.
See a full fitted-result → exhibit chain in the [JF execution walkthrough](../../../Journal-of-Finance-Skills/resources/worked-examples/02-execution-walkthrough.md).
## Anti-patterns
- A point estimate or trend line with no interval / margin of error
- Tables that omit the base N or hide whether estimates are weighted
- Exhibits that require the prose to be intelligible (not self-contained)
- Color-only encoding that fails in grayscale or for colorblind readers
- Exhibit numbers/values that don't match the deposited code output
## Exhibit pass for Public Opinion Quarterly
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the public-opinion construct, sampling frame, mode effects, weighting/nonresponse plan, and trend or causal interpretation; then test whether the manuscript addresses survey and public-opinion reviewers who inspect measurement, sampling, mode, nonresponse, and inference about attitudes or behavior.
- **Primary move:** For every table or figure, state the object, sample/case base, uncertainty display, and one sentence the exhibit proves for this venue.
- **Decision ledger:** return `claim / evidence / blocker / next edit` rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.
- **Sibling comparison:** compare against Political Analysis for methods-first work, Journal of Politics for political-science theory, Communication Research for media-effects framing; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
- **Verification floor:** before submission-ready advice, re-open `resources/official-source-map.md` for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.
## Output format
```
【Main exhibit】what it shows + why a figure/table
【Self-contained?】title + labels + note + base N + wording/mode? [Y/N]
【Uncertainty shown?】CI / MOE from design-based estimates? [Y/N]
【Weighting noted?】weighted vs unweighted clear? [Y/N]
【Accessible?】grayscale-legible + colorblind-safe? [Y/N]
【Reproducible?】generated by master script, matches package? [Y/N]
【Next】poq-writing-style
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — plotting tools for trends, AMCE, and design-based intervals
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — word-count rule (excludes figures/tables/appendices)
---
**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Public-Opinion-Quarterly-Skills/skills/poq-tables-figures/SKILL.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!