Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) via ScholarOne Manuscripts — submission-type selection, double-blind preparation, word caps, AAPOR-standard Appendix A disclosure, the Data Availability Statement, and the replication package. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add thedixitjain/the-mega-skill-library --skill poq-submission --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Poq Submission?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-poq-submission)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: poq-submission
description: "Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) via ScholarOne Manuscripts — submission-type selection, double-blind preparation, word caps, AAPOR-standard Appendix A disclosure, the Data Availability Statement, and the replication package. Final checks; it does not draft content."
category: backend-and-data
source_repo: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
source_path: "Public-Opinion-Quarterly-Skills/skills/poq-submission/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/Public-Opinion-Quarterly-Skills/skills/poq-submission/SKILL.md
---
# Submission Preflight (poq-submission)
The last check before pressing submit on **ScholarOne Manuscripts**. POQ is **double-blind**, so the
single most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript — and the second is a missing or
incomplete **Appendix A: Disclosure Elements**. Verify volatile specifics on the official page before
relying on them.
## When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files/metadata ScholarOne expects
- Confirming the type's word cap is met and the manuscript is properly anonymized and disclosed
## Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
- **Publisher / affiliate:** Oxford University Press / American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR).
- **Portal:** **ScholarOne Manuscripts** (`mc.manuscriptcentral.com/poq`).
- **Review model:** **double-blind** — anonymize the manuscript; provide a separate title page.
- **Submission types & caps (text + notes; exclude figures, tables, references, appendices):**
Original Article **≤ 6,500**; Research Note **< 3,000**; Polls in Context **≤ 2,500**; Research
Synthesis **≤ 6,500** (incl. notes); Book Review **~1,200**.
- **AAPOR disclosure:** **Appendix A: Disclosure Elements** for all data reported (funding, exact
wording, population, sample design, mode + dates, response rate per AAPOR definitions, sample sizes +
precision, clustering/weighting design effects).
- **Data policy:** replication package to **POQ's Harvard Dataverse**; **Data Availability Statement**
in the endmatter; materials archived **before typesetting**.
- **Fee:** no submission fee stated (consistent as of 2026-06-22); any open-access APC handled by OUP
after acceptance — re-verify current charges on the OUP page before submission (待核实).
## Preflight checklist
### Type & length
- [ ] Type chosen and its word cap met (Article ≤ 6,500 / Note < 3,000 / Polls ≤ 2,500 — text + notes)
- [ ] Abstract present and within the current requirement (待核实 on exact cap)
- [ ] Footnotes/endnotes counted toward the cap; long methods moved to appendices (excluded)
### AAPOR disclosure (the POQ-specific gate)
- [ ] **Appendix A: Disclosure Elements** present and complete for every dataset
- [ ] Response rate stated **with AAPOR Standard Definition + calculation**
- [ ] Sample design, mode, dates, sample sizes, precision, weighting/clustering documented
### Anonymity (double-blind)
- [ ] No author names, affiliations, or acknowledgments in the manuscript
- [ ] No obvious self-references; self-citations neutralized
- [ ] Identifying **file metadata stripped** (document properties, comments)
- [ ] Separate (non-anonymous) title page prepared as a distinct file
### Data & files
- [ ] Replication package staged for **POQ's Dataverse** (reproduces every table/figure)
- [ ] **Data Availability Statement** drafted for the endmatter
- [ ] Ethics / IRB / human-subjects compliance addressed
- [ ] Figures/tables self-contained and accessible (see `poq-tables-figures`)
## How the editorial office reads your upload
Think of the ScholarOne package as being screened in this order, and stage files so each check
passes on the first look:
1. **Anonymity sweep** — the anonymized main document is opened first. A name in the running
header, an "as we showed (Author 2023)" self-citation, or author initials in tracked-changes
metadata sends the package back before any editor reads the abstract. Export a fresh PDF/DOCX
and check File → Properties, not just the visible text.
2. **Type-and-cap check** — the declared submission type is compared against the word count you
enter. Count text + notes yourself before upload; an Article-length manuscript declared as a
Research Note is returned, not silently retyped.
3. **Disclosure scan** — the office looks for Appendix A by name. Label it exactly "Appendix A:
Disclosure Elements," one block per dataset, response-rate formula named (e.g., AAPOR RR3), so a
screener can verify completeness without reading the methods section.
4. **Endmatter** — Data Availability Statement present, Dataverse plan stated, IRB noted. Missing
endmatter is the most common cause of a revise-before-review email.
A package that survives all four screens goes to the editor with no round-trip — often saving two
weeks of calendar time before first decision.
## Anti-patterns
- Leaving author identifiers in the text, acknowledgments, or file metadata (breaks double-blind)
- A missing or incomplete Appendix A; a response rate with no AAPOR definition
- Sending a long paper to the Research Note or Polls in Context track
- Counting figures/tables against the cap (they are excluded) while ignoring footnotes (they count)
- Budgeting for a submission fee that is not charged (verify)
## Output format
```
【Type】Article / Note / Polls in Context / Synthesis / Book Review (cap met? Y/N)
【Appendix A】complete + AAPOR response rate calculation? [Y/N]
【Anonymized】text + self-refs + file metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Word count】within cap (text + notes)?
【Repro package + DAS】staged for POQ Dataverse + DAS drafted? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → poq-rebuttal on R&R
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — reference managers, anonymization, repro tooling
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official POQ URLs behind every fact in this pack
---
**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Public-Opinion-Quarterly-Skills/skills/poq-submission/SKILL.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!