Skip to content
Back to skills

Pom Workflow

ASecurity

Use when deciding which pom-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills, and it identifies your method track (analytical / empirical / behavioral / data-science).

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 7 views
  • Added September 12, 2026
ai-agentsgogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 12, 2026

npx -y skills add thedixitjain/the-mega-skill-library --skill pom-workflow --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pom Workflow?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pom Workflow
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/thedixitjain-pom-workflow/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-pom-workflow)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: pom-workflow
description: "Use when deciding which pom-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills, and it identifies your method track (analytical / empirical / behavioral / data-science)."
category: general-purpose
source_repo: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
source_path: "Production-and-Operations-Management-Skills/skills/pom-workflow/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/Production-and-Operations-Management-Skills/skills/pom-workflow/SKILL.md
---


# Production and Operations Management Workflow (pom-workflow)

## Overview

This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill; it tells you **which pom-* skill to use right now** for your POM manuscript.

Default assumption: unless told otherwise, the target is **Production and Operations Management (POM)** — the flagship journal of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS), published by SAGE since January 2024 (previously Wiley-Blackwell), ISSN 1059-1478, twelve issues per year, founded and edited by Kalyan Singhal (University of Baltimore). POM accepts the **full breadth of operations management** — analytical/mathematical modeling, empirical OM, behavioral/experimental OM, and operations data science — and routes every paper to one of many named **Departments** (Behavioral Operations, Supply Chain Management, Healthcare Operations, Sustainable Operations, Operations Management Data Analytics, plus interface departments). The non-negotiable bar: the work must be of **significant interest to practicing operations managers** *and* make a **substantial contribution to knowledge and practice**, executed rigorously by whatever method fits.

> Editors (verified 2026-06-22 via POMS / SAGE): **Kalyan Singhal** is founder & Editor-in-Chief and **Subodha Kumar** is Co-Editor-in-Chief; the department roster and Department Editors rotate. Verify the live masthead and departments at poms.org/journal. POM is hybrid open access on SAGE; the optional Sage Choice/open-access APC and any data-deposit mandate are **待核实** — see `resources/official-source-map.md`.

## When to trigger

- "What should I do next?" with a half-built POM manuscript
- You have a model or dataset but no clear managerial insight
- You are unsure which Department your paper belongs to
- You received a POM decision letter and need to switch into response mode
- You keep bouncing between model, analysis, and writing without a plan

## Routing table

| Current symptom                                                        | Next skill                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Idea is vague; unclear if it is OM and POM-fit; no target Department   | `pom-topic-selection`       |
| Model/hypotheses lack a clear mechanism, assumptions, or propositions  | `pom-theory-development`    |
| Front end reads as gap-spotting; wrong department's literature engaged | `pom-literature-positioning`|
| Method may not match the question (model vs data vs experiment)        | `pom-methods`               |
| Have proofs/data; unsure about numerics, identification, robustness    | `pom-data-analysis`         |
| Results exist but the "so what for the operations manager" is thin     | `pom-contribution-framing`  |
| Exhibits cluttered, not self-explanatory, or off house style          | `pom-tables-figures`        |
| Prose buries the argument; over the 32-page cap                        | `pom-writing-style`         |
| Ready to submit; need the ScholarOne + department preflight            | `pom-submission`            |
| Want to understand POM department review before/after submit           | `pom-review-process`        |
| Received an R&R; need to plan and draft the response                   | `pom-rebuttal`              |

## Default order

1. `pom-topic-selection` — lock an OM question, POM fit, and target Department
2. `pom-theory-development` — build the model/mechanism; derive propositions or hypotheses
3. `pom-literature-positioning` — engage the right department's prior OM work
4. `pom-methods` — match method (optimization/stochastic/game-theory/empirical/behavioral/ML)
5. `pom-data-analysis` — execute proofs and numerics, or identification, estimation, robustness
6. `pom-contribution-framing` — turn results into a managerial-and-knowledge contribution
7. `pom-tables-figures` — finalize exhibits (result tables, comparative-statics plots, schematics)
8. `pom-writing-style` — full-manuscript polish; enforce 32-page cap and e-companion split
9. `pom-submission` — ScholarOne preflight (department routing, double-blind, same-data disclosure)
10. `pom-review-process` — set expectations; understand the no-resubmission rule
11. `pom-rebuttal` — after an R&R, revise then draft the point-by-point response

> `pom-tables-figures` and `pom-writing-style` are **late-stage polish**. Do not invoke them while the model, identification, or managerial insight is still unsettled.

## Decision shortcuts

- "I have an elegant model but no managerial takeaway" → `pom-topic-selection` then `pom-contribution-framing`
- "Which department do I submit to?" → `pom-topic-selection`
- "My intro says 'no one has modeled X'" (gap-spotting) → `pom-literature-positioning`
- "Reviewer says insight is not relevant to practice" → `pom-contribution-framing`
- "I am 6 pages over the 32-page cap" → `pom-writing-style` (move proofs to the e-companion)
- "I was rejected — can I resubmit to another department?" → `pom-review-process` (almost never)

## Routing snapshot template

Fill this snapshot at every planning checkpoint; it makes the current stage, the department route, and the hard constraints visible before you invoke the next skill.

```text
POM MANUSCRIPT ROUTING SNAPSHOT — fill in before invoking the next pom-* skill
==============================================================================
Working title ...........: <concise, descriptive, <= 25 words>
Method track ............: [ ] analytical/mathematical model   [ ] empirical OM
                           [ ] behavioral/experimental         [ ] operations data science
Target Department .......: <e.g., Supply Chain Management / Behavioral Operations /
                            Healthcare Operations / Sustainable Operations /
                            Operations Management Data Analytics / interface dept.>
                            (verify live roster at poms.org/journal before submitting)
Operations decision .....: <who decides what, under which constraints>
Managerial lever ........: <what a practicing operations manager does differently>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STAGE GATES — mark exactly one CURRENT; earlier gates must be DONE
  1. [ ] Question, POM fit, department locked .......... pom-topic-selection
  2. [ ] Mechanism / propositions or hypotheses built ... pom-theory-development
  3. [ ] Department's prior OM literature engaged ....... pom-literature-positioning
  4. [ ] Method matched to the question ................. pom-methods
  5. [ ] Proofs/numerics or identification/robustness ... pom-data-analysis
  6. [ ] Knowledge + practice contribution framed ....... pom-contribution-framing
  7. [ ] Exhibits finalized ............................. pom-tables-figures
  8. [ ] Prose polished; page cap enforced .............. pom-writing-style
  9. [ ] ScholarOne preflight cleared ................... pom-submission
 10. [ ] Decision letter interpreted .................... pom-review-process
 11. [ ] R&R response drafted after revising ............ pom-rebuttal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HARD CONSTRAINTS — all must hold before gate 9
 [ ] Main document within 32 pages incl. abstract, exhibits, appendices, refs
 [ ] Overflow (proofs, derivations, extended robustness) -> e-companion file
 [ ] Double-blind: identity scrubbed from files, metadata, self-citations
 [ ] Same-data / related prior work listed for the cover-letter disclosure
 [ ] Not a barred resubmission (no prior POM rejection without invitation)
 Portal: ScholarOne — mc.manuscriptcentral.com/poms
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRACTICE GATE — POM's non-negotiable bar
 Significant interest to practicing operations managers ....: yes / not yet
 Substantial contribution to knowledge AND practice ........: yes / not yet
 If either reads "not yet", route to pom-contribution-framing before polish.
```

## Difference vs. M&SOM / Management Science / JOM stacks

- **POM**: POMS/SAGE flagship; department-routed; rigor *and* practicing-manager relevance weighted together; 32-page cap with an unlimited online e-companion.
- **M&SOM / Management Science** (INFORMS): different limits and norms; not department-letter-routed the same way.
- **JOM / IJOPM**: often more empirical/process-oriented; different publishers and formats.

## Anti-patterns

- **Do not** submit without choosing a Department — misrouting wastes a cycle.
- **Do not** let `pom-tables-figures` beautify exhibits before the model is settled.
- **Do not** treat polish as a substitute for managerial relevance — POM's practice gate cannot be styled away.
- **Do not** plan a resubmission of a rejected paper to another department; it is barred unless explicitly invited.

---

**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Production-and-Operations-Management-Skills/skills/pom-workflow/SKILL.md`

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.