Dynamic multi-agent workflows — plan first, then orchestrate parallel agents with adversarial verification via the local odw daemon. Use when the user asks for a \"workflow\", says \"ultracode\", or hands you a task spanning many files/items that benefits from parallel agents.
3 stars
0 votes
0 copies
3 views
Added September 12, 2026
ai-agentsgoshellsqlnodegitapi
Works with
api
mcp
Security analysis
A92/100
mediumInstalls packages at runtime which could introduce malicious dependencies
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Odw Hashgraph Online?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-odw-hashgraph-online)
---
name: odw
description: "Dynamic multi-agent workflows — plan first, then orchestrate parallel agents with adversarial verification via the local odw daemon. Use when the user asks for a \"workflow\", says \"ultracode\", or hands you a task spanning many files/items that benefits from parallel agents."
category: ai-agents-and-harness
source_repo: hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
source_path: "plugins/Suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflows/skills/odw/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/blob/HEAD/plugins/Suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflows/skills/odw/SKILL.md
---
# Open Dynamic Workflows
You orchestrate large tasks through an explicit plan and a local daemon instead of improvising. The scripts referenced below live next to this skill in `scripts/`.
## Model & API key (read this first)
Codex exposes **no API for an extension to invoke its own model**, so — unlike the OpenCode plugin, which runs ODW's real engine *through* OpenCode's configured model with no extra key — there are exactly two honest paths here:
- **No-key path (Native fallback):** *you, Codex,* orchestrate the task with your own model and native subagents (platform-capped, ~6 concurrent). This uses no extra key, but it is **not** the ODW engine — no sandbox, no 100-way fan-out, no crash-resume, no budget hard-stop.
- **Full-engine path (Daemon):** the real ODW engine runs in the local daemon, which uses **its own** provider key in `~/.odw/config.json` (Anthropic / OpenAI-compatible / Ollama — Ollama is keyless/local). This is the only way to get the full engine on Codex today.
There is no middle option unless/until Codex ships a host-model API or MCP sampling. Pick the path based on whether the daemon is up (Step 0).
## Step 0 — Daemon check
Run: `node scripts/daemon-bridge.js --check`
- Exit 0 → daemon is up; use the daemon path.
- Exit 1 → daemon is down; use the native fallback path (and mention once that the daemon installs from github.com/Suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflows — clone, `npm install`, `npm run setup`, then `odw-daemon start`).
## Daemon path
1. **Plan:** `node scripts/daemon-bridge.js plan "<the user's task>"` — prints a JSON plan: task graph, topology (mapreduce / pipeline / adversarial / consensus / treesearch / hybrid), specialist roles, hard limits (budget, timeouts, concurrency), cost/time estimate and the compiled orchestration script.
2. **Confirm:** show the user a compact summary (topology, agent count, est. cost, est. time) and ask before executing anything beyond read-only work.
3. **Execute:** `node scripts/daemon-bridge.js exec plan.json` — returns a `wf_...` id. The daemon runs the script in a sandbox: 16–100 concurrent agents, SQLite checkpoints, crash-resume, budget hard-stop.
4. **Monitor / report:** `node scripts/daemon-bridge.js status <wf_id>` while running; `node scripts/daemon-bridge.js result <wf_id>` blocks until done and prints the final synthesized result. Relay it to the user.
## Native fallback path (no daemon)
Orchestrate with your own subagent capability, platform-limited:
1. Decompose into discovery → parallel work → adversarial verification → synthesis. State the plan first.
2. Fan out independent items to subagents with hyper-scoped instructions and structured JSON outputs.
3. Verify aggregated results (hunt false positives, challenge severity, find gaps) before synthesizing.
4. Respect safety: never write files or run mutating commands without explicit user approval.
## Safety rules (both paths)
- Read-only operations are auto-approved; writes, shell commands and git commits need user approval.
- Respect the budget: if the plan estimate looks expensive, say so before executing.
- Never put secrets in prompts, plans, or logs.
---
**Source:** [`hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins`](https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins) → `plugins/Suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflows/skills/odw/SKILL.md`