Use when running and reporting the empirical analysis for a Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE) manuscript — building the archival sample, choosing fixed effects and clustered standard errors, executing the identification design, and demonstrating robustness for large-sample capital-markets/contracting/disclosure data. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (jae-methods) or frame the contribution (jae-contribution-framing).
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add thedixitjain/the-mega-skill-library --skill jae-data-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jae Data Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-jae-data-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jae-data-analysis
description: "Use when running and reporting the empirical analysis for a Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE) manuscript — building the archival sample, choosing fixed effects and clustered standard errors, executing the identification design, and demonstrating robustness for large-sample capital-markets/contracting/disclosure data. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (jae-methods) or frame the contribution (jae-contribution-framing)."
category: backend-and-data
source_repo: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
source_path: "Journal-of-Accounting-and-Economics-Skills/skills/jae-data-analysis/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/Journal-of-Accounting-and-Economics-Skills/skills/jae-data-analysis/SKILL.md
---
# Data Analysis & Inference for JAE (jae-data-analysis)
## When to trigger
- The sample is built and it is time to estimate and report
- You are unsure how to specify fixed effects or cluster standard errors
- Reviewers will probe endogeneity, correlated omitted variables, or sample selection
- A reviewer says "the standard errors are understated" or "this is not identified"
## Build and document the archival sample first
JAE reviewers expect a transparent **sample-construction waterfall**: starting population (e.g., Compustat firm-years), each merge (CRSP, I/B/E/S, Execucomp, DealScan, Audit Analytics via WRDS), each exclusion (financials/utilities, missing data, penny stocks), and the final N at every step. Report descriptive statistics and a correlation table. **Winsorize** continuous variables (commonly at 1%/99%) and say so.
## Specify the estimator to match the panel and the design
| Data structure / claim | Estimator / specification |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Firm panel with unobserved heterogeneity | Firm and year fixed effects (e.g., `reghdfe`) |
| Inference with within-firm correlation | Standard errors clustered by firm; often **two-way** (firm & year) |
| Regulatory shock / treatment | Difference-in-differences; report pre-trends |
| Endogenous regressor | 2SLS/IV with first-stage diagnostics (F-stat, exclusion) |
| Self-selection | Heckman (report inverse Mills) or PSM (report balance) |
| Information event | Short-window CARs; cross-sectional regression of returns |
| Binary/limited outcome | Logit/probit/Tobit as the outcome dictates |
Match the **clustering** to where correlation lives in the data; a single firm-clustered SE may understate inference when shocks are common across firms in a year — two-way clustering is the JAE norm for many panels.
## Execute the identification, not just the regression
- **DiD**: plot/test parallel pre-trends; report the dynamic (event-time) coefficients, not only the average treatment effect.
- **IV**: report the first stage, the instrument's strength, and defend the exclusion restriction in words.
- **Matching/Heckman**: report covariate balance or the selection equation; show results are not an artifact of the procedure.
- **Cross-sectional partitions**: the theory's mechanism test — show the effect concentrates where the friction (information asymmetry, weak governance, tight covenants) is severe.
## Robustness (expected, not optional)
- Alternative proxies for the key construct (e.g., different discretionary-accruals or conservatism measures).
- Alternative specifications (controls in/out, alternative fixed effects, subsamples).
- Placebo/falsification tests and, for DiD, a non-event window.
- Sensitivity to correlated omitted variables (e.g., bounding / coefficient-stability arguments).
- Address economically plausible alternative explanations empirically.
## Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
Run the battery, don't just enumerate it. Full map:
[`execution-with-mcp`](../../../shared-resources/empirical-methods/execution-with-mcp.md). JAE is empirical accounting with an economics lens; treat identification and weak-IV-robust inference as the binding constraints.
- **Many outcomes / specifications:** `romano_wolf` (step-down FWER) or
`benjamini_hochberg` — report the adjusted threshold.
- **OVB sensitivity:** `oster_delta` / `sensemakr`.
- **Inference:** `wild_cluster_bootstrap` (few clusters), `twoway_cluster` / `conley`;
multilevel data → cluster at the right level.
- **Re-fit off one handle:** `audit_result(result_id)` lists the missing checks and the
exact `suggest_function` for each.
- **Exhibits:** `etable` / `did_summary_to_latex` from the handle — no retyped numbers.
Keep the decisive checks in the body and the exhaustive battery in the appendix. See the
executed chain in the [JF execution walkthrough](../../../Journal-of-Finance-Skills/resources/worked-examples/02-execution-walkthrough.md).
## Checklist
- [ ] Sample waterfall with N at each step; winsorization stated
- [ ] Descriptives and correlation table reported
- [ ] Fixed effects and **clustered (often two-way)** SEs match the design
- [ ] Identification executed (pre-trends / first stage / balance), not assumed
- [ ] Cross-sectional partition supports the economic mechanism
- [ ] Robustness: alternative proxies, specifications, placebos, sensitivity
- [ ] Economic magnitude (not only significance) reported
## Anti-patterns
- **Pooled OLS with no fixed effects or clustering** on a firm panel.
- **One-way clustering** when shocks are common across firms within a year.
- **Reporting an IV with no first stage** or no exclusion-restriction defense.
- **DiD with no pre-trend evidence.**
- **Significance with no economic magnitude** ("statistically significant" but trivially small).
- **Selective controls** that make the result appear.
## Output format
```
【Sample】population → merges → exclusions → final N; winsorized at ...
【Specification】FE (firm/year); SE clustering (firm / two-way)
【Identification executed】pre-trends / first-stage F / balance ...
【Main result】coefficient, t-stat, economic magnitude
【Mechanism (cross-section)】effect concentrated where friction severe
【Robustness】alt proxies / specs / placebo / sensitivity
【Open issues for reviewers】...
【Next step】jae-contribution-framing
```
---
**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Journal-of-Accounting-and-Economics-Skills/skills/jae-data-analysis/SKILL.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!