Use when deciding whether an AI project is a strong IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI fit, comparing main track versus special tracks, Survey Track, AIJ/JAIR expedited-publication potential, or alternative AI venues such as NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AAAI, AISTATS, UAI, COLT, KDD, CVPR, ACL, or ICRA.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add thedixitjain/the-mega-skill-library --skill ijcai-topic-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ijcai Topic Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-ijcai-topic-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ijcai-topic-selection
description: "Use when deciding whether an AI project is a strong IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI fit, comparing main track versus special tracks, Survey Track, AIJ/JAIR expedited-publication potential, or alternative AI venues such as NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AAAI, AISTATS, UAI, COLT, KDD, CVPR, ACL, or ICRA."
category: general-purpose
source_repo: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
source_path: "IJCAI-Skills/skills/ijcai-topic-selection/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/IJCAI-Skills/skills/ijcai-topic-selection/SKILL.md
---
# IJCAI Topic Selection
Use this before writing. IJCAI main-track submissions should report significant, original,
previously unpublished AI results with broad relevance to the AI community.
## Fit test
- Ask whether the paper advances an AI problem, AI technique, AI application domain, or
cross-disciplinary AI boundary rather than only reporting an application result.
- Prefer IJCAI when the contribution is broadly AI-facing, technically complete in a compact
format, and can survive a two-phase review process with limited response leverage.
- Consider special tracks for human-centered AI, AI for social good, AI4Tech, AI and health,
or AI and robotics when the venue-specific framing is stronger than a general main-track
frame.
- Consider the Survey Track only for mature areas and author teams with established topic
expertise.
- Route elsewhere if the contribution is primarily ML theory, representation learning,
computer vision, NLP, robotics, HCI, systems, or data mining and a specialist venue has a
clearer audience.
- Check policy fit early: anonymity, recent rejection disclosures, dual-submission limits,
data ethics, LLM-use constraints, and in-person presentation feasibility.
## Venue routing matrix
IJCAI's edge is breadth and a compact format, but a sharply specialist contribution often finds
a clearer audience elsewhere. Route by where the strongest reviewers and framing sit.
| Contribution profile | Strong IJCAI fit | Consider instead |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cross-cutting AI idea (search, KR, planning, multi-agent) readable across subfields | Yes, main track | — |
| Deep ML theory or representation learning | Sometimes | NeurIPS, ICML, COLT |
| Heavy CV or NLP system | Rarely the best home | CVPR, ACL |
| Mature area survey by established authors | Survey Track | Journal survey |
| Polished, complete result wanting fast journal route | Main track plus AIJ/JAIR ecosystem | — |
| Social-good or human-centered AI framing | Special track | Domain venue |
## Worked vignette: a game-theory mechanism
A mechanism-design result for multi-agent resource allocation could go to an economics-and-
computation venue or to IJCAI. If the contribution is an AI technique broadly relevant across
agents, search, and learning audiences and fits a compact 7-page body, IJCAI's main track is a
strong home; the game-theory/economic-paradigms scope is squarely in-bounds. If the core
advance is a fine-grained economic-theory proof aimed at a specialist EC audience, route there
instead. Decide by which reviewer pool best judges the central claim.
## Reviewer/fit pushback and the venue-specific fix
- "This is an application, not an AI advance." Reframe the AI technique or problem contribution,
or route to a domain venue.
- "Too specialized for a broad PC." Either broaden the framing for IJCAI breadth or choose the
specialist venue with a clearer audience.
- "Survey from a junior team." Reserve the Survey Track for mature areas and established topic
expertise.
## Output format
```text
[Fit] strong IJCAI / possible IJCAI / better elsewhere
[Best track] main / special / survey / other venue
[Contribution sentence] <one sentence>
[Top rejection risk] <novelty/clarity/evidence/policy/scope>
[Next action] <experiment, framing, related work, or venue switch>
```
---
**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `IJCAI-Skills/skills/ijcai-topic-selection/SKILL.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!