Loop-breaking self-diagnosis. Use when 3+ consecutive failures occur, circular retries persist, or context overwhelms the session.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add thedixitjain/the-mega-skill-library --skill agent-introspection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Agent Introspection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-agent-introspection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: agent-introspection
description: "Loop-breaking self-diagnosis. Use when 3+ consecutive failures occur, circular retries persist, or context overwhelms the session."
category: ai-agents-and-harness
source_repo: hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
source_path: "plugins/epicsagas/epic-harness/skills/agent-introspection/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/blob/HEAD/plugins/epicsagas/epic-harness/skills/agent-introspection/SKILL.md
---
# Agent Introspection — Systematic Self-Diagnosis
## Iron Law
NO UNSUPPORTED SELF-HEALING CLAIMS. Only assert recovery actions you can actually perform with available tools.
## When to Trigger
- 3+ consecutive failures on the same task
- Repeating the same approach with different parameters (loop detection)
- Context window exceeds 70% without resolution
- Error messages repeat with no progress
- User explicitly says "you're stuck" or "try a different approach"
## Process
### 1. Failure Capture
Stop immediately and record:
- **Error type**: syntax_error / type_error / test_fail / lint_fail / build_fail / runtime_error / permission_denied / not_found
- **Last 3 tool calls**: what was attempted and what failed
- **Context pressure**: approximate context usage percentage
- **What changed**: what was the last successful state
### 2. Root Cause Diagnosis
Match against known patterns:
| Pattern | Symptoms | Root Cause |
|---------|----------|------------|
| **Loop trap** | Same error 3+ times | Wrong approach, not wrong parameters |
| **Context overflow** | Increasingly confused responses | Too much information, need compaction |
| **Environment drift** | "Works locally" failures | Missing env var, different tool version |
| **Cascade failure** | Fix A breaks B | Underlying assumption is wrong |
| **Tool mismatch** | Wrong tool for the job | Need a different approach entirely |
### 3. Controlled Recovery
Execute ONLY the smallest safe action:
- **Loop trap** → Abandon current approach entirely. Try a fundamentally different strategy.
- **Context overflow** → Run `/compact` or summarize current state, then continue.
- **Environment drift** → Verify environment with explicit checks (`which`, `--version`).
- **Cascade failure** → Revert to last known good state. Re-analyze assumptions.
- **Tool mismatch** → Switch tools. If `Edit` fails 3 times, try `Write`. If `Bash` fails, try `Read` first.
### 4. Introspection Report
Generate a structured report:
```markdown
## Introspection Report
- **Failure type**: [type]
- **Root cause**: [diagnosis]
- **Recovery action**: [what was done]
- **Confidence**: [high/medium/low]
- **Next step**: [what to do if this happens again]
```
Save to memory:
```bash
epic mem add \
--title "Self-diagnosis: {error_type} in {file}" \
--type error \
--body "Pattern: ...\nRoot cause: ...\nRecovery: ...\n"
```
## Anti-Rationalization
| Excuse | Rebuttal | What to do instead |
|--------|----------|-------------------|
| "One more try might work" | 3 failures means the approach is wrong, not unlucky. | Stop and run the full 4-step introspection process. |
| "I just need to tweak the parameters" | Tweaking a failing approach is not debugging. Step back and reassess. | Abandon the current approach and try a fundamentally different strategy. |
| "I can fix this myself" | Asking for help is not weakness. Escalation saves everyone time. | Escalate to the user with a clear summary of what was tried and what failed. |
| "The error is clear, I know the fix" | You said that 3 times already. Prove it with a different approach. | Run the introspection report and verify the fix with a test before claiming success. |
## Evidence Required
- [ ] Failure type classified correctly
- [ ] Root cause matched to known pattern
- [ ] Recovery action is the smallest safe action
- [ ] Introspection report generated
- [ ] Failure pattern recorded in memory
## Red Flags
- Trying the same command more than 3 times with minor variations
- Claiming "fixed!" without running the actual test
- Not recording the failure pattern in memory
- Continuing after 70% context usage without compacting
---
**Source:** [`hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins`](https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins) → `plugins/epicsagas/epic-harness/skills/agent-introspection/SKILL.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!