Tracks per-agent token usage and flags waste in parallel dispatch. Use when evaluating parallel agent efficiency or after a multi-agent run.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add thedixitjain/the-mega-skill-library --skill agent-expenditure --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Agent Expenditure?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thedixitjain-agent-expenditure)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: agent-expenditure
description: "Tracks per-agent token usage and flags waste in parallel dispatch. Use when evaluating parallel agent efficiency or after a multi-agent run."
category: ai-agents-and-harness
source_repo: athola/claude-night-market
source_path: "plugins/conserve/skills/agent-expenditure/SKILL.md"
source_url: https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market/blob/HEAD/plugins/conserve/skills/agent-expenditure/SKILL.md
---
# Agent Token Waste Monitoring
## When To Use
- After parallel agent dispatch completes
- When evaluating whether to increase agent count
- During retrospectives on agent-heavy workflows
- When plan-before-large-dispatch rule triggers
## When NOT To Use
- Single-agent workflows (no coordination overhead)
- During active agent execution (post-hoc analysis)
- For token budgeting (use token-conservation instead)
## Brooks's Law for Agents
Dispatching more agents does not always help. Coordination overhead
grows with agent count:
| Agent Count | Expected Overhead | Guidance |
|-------------|-------------------|----------|
| 1-3 | Negligible | Dispatch freely |
| 4-5 | 10-15% | Acceptable; plan first |
| 6-8 | 20-30% | Monitor closely |
| 9+ | 30%+ | Likely counterproductive |
Coordination overhead is measured as shared-file conflicts: concurrent
Read/Write operations on the same file by different agents, as a
percentage of total agent runtime.
## Post-Dispatch Review Checklist
After parallel agent runs, evaluate:
1. Did each agent produce unique findings?
2. Was total token expenditure proportional to value?
3. Did any agent duplicate another's work?
4. Would fewer agents have produced the same result?
If 2+ questions answer no, reduce agent count in future dispatches
of the same type.
## Waste Signals
See `modules/waste-signals.md` for the 5 waste signal categories and
detection criteria.
## Cross-References
- `.claude/rules/plan-before-large-dispatch.md` for the 4+ agent
planning requirement
- `conserve:token-conservation` for session-level token budgeting
- `conjure:agent-teams` for dispatch coordination
## Exit Criteria
- [ ] All 4 post-dispatch review questions answered with explicit
yes/no per agent (unique findings, proportional expenditure, no
duplication, fewer agents sufficient)
- [ ] Waste signals from `modules/waste-signals.md` checked against
the completed run; any triggered signal named with the category
- [ ] A recommendation is produced: either "reduce agent count to N"
or "dispatch was efficient" with coordination overhead percentage
- [ ] If 2+ review questions answer no, a concrete agent-count
reduction is stated for future dispatches of the same type
---
**Source:** [`athola/claude-night-market`](https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market) → `plugins/conserve/skills/agent-expenditure/SKILL.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!