Skip to content
Back to skills

Community Moderation And Governance

ASecurity

Guidance for setting up and enforcing community standards, managing membership quality, and maintaining a healthy member experience in B2B communities

  • 8 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
businessrustgodocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add the-nam-shub/e5-real-skills --skill community-moderation-and-governance --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Community Moderation And Governance?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Community Moderation And Governance
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/the-nam-shub-community-moderation-and-governance/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/the-nam-shub-community-moderation-and-governance)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: community-moderation-and-governance
description: "Guidance for setting up and enforcing community standards, managing membership quality, and maintaining a healthy member experience in B2B communities"
version: "2026-04-20"
episode_count: 1
---

# Community Moderation and Governance

## Overview
This skill covers how to moderate and govern a B2B marketing community — including membership curation, guideline documentation, and community manager presence. All practices are sourced exclusively from Exit Five podcast guests; no outside frameworks or general best practices have been added.

---

## Membership Curation

**Define who you will not accept — and enforce it.**
Establish a clear profile of who the community is designed for, and actively reject or remove members who don't fit. The two bad-actor types named explicitly in the source are aggressive salespeople and spammers — use these as your starting anchors. For each type you identify, write a short rejection message template so you're not drafting from scratch under pressure. Then define the trigger point: will you screen at the application stage, or act after a member joins and exhibits the behavior? Both decisions need to be made in advance. Accept that some people will be unhappy with rejections; this is a necessary cost of maintaining the trust and quality that makes the community worth joining. (Source: Matt Carnevale, Episode #320)

---

## Community Guidelines

**Write down the gray areas — don't leave them to interpretation.**
Don't rely on vague norms or assume members will intuit what's acceptable. Create written guidelines that explicitly address gray-area behaviors: self-promotion, thought leadership posts, and solicitation. Anchor the guidelines in a single core principle that captures the community's purpose — for example, "we want people talking *to* each other, not *at* each other." Then model what that principle looks like in practice. For a self-promotion gray area, a guideline entry might read: *Acceptable — sharing a post-mortem of a campaign you ran with lessons learned. Not acceptable — posting a link to your product with a call to action.* This kind of concrete example, applied to each gray-area behavior, is what reduces confusion and makes enforcement consistent. (Source: Dave Gerhardt, Episode #320)

---

## Community Manager Presence

**Treat community management as a dedicated role, not a shared responsibility.**
If community management is currently a part-time or shared responsibility, the source position is that this is a structural problem — not a bandwidth problem. The fix is to designate a single owner whose primary job is community, not to ask someone to do it alongside other work. The community manager must read every post and respond to comments. The rationale: members visit infrequently, so when they do log in, the experience they find will determine whether they return. Inconsistent or low-presence management will result in member churn. (Source: Matt Carnevale, Episode #320)

---

## Where Experts Disagree

No disagreements were identified among the contributing episodes for this category.

---

## What NOT To Do

- **Don't leave gray-area behaviors undefined.** Ambiguity about self-promotion, solicitation, and thought leadership creates confusion for members and friction for enforcement. Write it down. (Source: Dave Gerhardt, Episode #320)
- **Don't accept members who don't fit the community's defined profile.** Misaligned members — particularly aggressive salespeople and spammers — degrade the experience for everyone else and erode the trust that makes the community valuable. (Source: Matt Carnevale, Episode #320)
- **Don't staff community management as a side responsibility.** Assigning it part-time or alongside other work is a structural error. When members log in and find an unresponsive or poorly maintained space, they leave and don't return. (Source: Matt Carnevale, Episode #320)

---

## Sources

| Episode | Guests | Date |
|---------|--------|------|
| Episode #320 | Matt Carnevale, Dave Gerhardt | 2026-01-12 |

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.