Back to skills
SKILL.md
Research Digest
ASecurityGenerate structured research briefs from RSS feeds and web sources on any topic. Synthesizes multiple sources into actionable analysis with key findings, data points, expert perspectives, and content angles.
- 126 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 0 views
- Added May 28, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding
npx -y skills add thatrebeccarae/claude-marketing --skill research-digest --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Research Digest?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/thatrebeccarae-research-digest)---
name: research-digest
description: "Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds and web sources on any topic. Synthesizes multiple sources into actionable analysis with key findings, data points, expert perspectives, and content angles."
license: MIT
origin: custom
author: Rebecca Rae Barton
author_url: https://github.com/thatrebeccarae
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
category: strategy
domain: research
updated: 2026-03-13
tested: 2026-03-17
tested_with: "Claude Code v2.1"
---
# Research Digest
Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds, web sources, and industry publications.
## Install
```bash
git clone https://github.com/thatrebeccarae/claude-marketing.git && cp -r claude-marketing/skills/research-digest ~/.claude/skills/
```
## Core Capabilities
- Pull from RSS feeds, web search, and curated sources
- Assess source credibility and recency
- Cross-reference findings across multiple sources
- Extract trends, data points, and expert opinions
- Identify counter-arguments and nuance
- Produce actionable research briefs
## Workflow
### 1. Source Collection
Gather raw material from:
- **RSS feeds** — industry blogs, news sites, newsletters (via any RSS reader/API)
- **Web search** — targeted queries for recent coverage
- **Industry reports** — analyst reports, whitepapers, earnings calls
- **Social/community** — Reddit, Twitter/X, LinkedIn discussions
### 2. Source Assessment
Evaluate each source on:
| Criterion | Weight | Scale |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Credibility | 30% | Original research > analysis > aggregation > opinion |
| Recency | 25% | Last 7 days > 30 days > 90 days > older |
| Relevance | 25% | Directly on topic > adjacent > tangential |
| Uniqueness | 20% | Novel data > unique angle > common knowledge |
### 3. Synthesis
- Identify convergent themes (3+ sources saying the same thing)
- Flag divergent views (contradictions between sources)
- Extract specific data points with citations
- Note the "so what" — why this matters for the target audience
### 4. Brief Generation
Produce a structured markdown brief.
## Brief Structure
```markdown
# Research Brief: [Topic]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Depth:** Quick scan / Standard / Deep dive
**Sources reviewed:** [count]
## Executive Summary
- [Key finding 1]
- [Key finding 2]
- [Key finding 3]
## Key Findings
### Finding 1: [Headline]
[2-3 paragraph analysis with source citations]
### Finding 2: [Headline]
[2-3 paragraph analysis with source citations]
## Data Points
| Metric | Value | Source | Date |
|--------|-------|--------|------|
## Expert Perspectives
- "[Quote]" — [Name, Title, Source]
## Counter-Arguments & Nuance
- [Opposing view with source]
## Content Angles
- [Angle 1: how to use this research in content]
- [Angle 2]
## Sources
1. [Source name] — [URL] — [Credibility: High/Medium/Low]
```
## Options
| Option | Values | Default |
|--------|--------|---------|
| Time range | 24h, 7d, 30d, 90d | 7d |
| Depth | quick, standard, deep | standard |
| Focus | topic keyword or category | required |
| Output | brief, report, raw-notes | brief |
## Quality Standards
1. **Minimum 3 independent sources** per key finding
2. **Recency bias** toward last 30 days unless historical context is needed
3. **Always include counter-arguments** — at least one contrarian or skeptical view
4. **Separate facts from opinions** — clearly label which is which
5. **Link to original sources** — never cite without attribution
6. **No speculation** — if data is missing, say so rather than guessing
For source credibility framework and synthesis methodology, see [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md).
Files in this skill
- EXAMPLES.md
- LICENSE
- REFERENCE.md
- SKILL.md
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…